Translation and transcultural adaptation of Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) to Brazilian version

Adaptação transcultural e validação do “health sciences evidence based practice questionnaire” para o português do Brasil

Introdução: o instrumento “Health Sciences Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire” avalia as diferentes dimensões da construção da prática baseada em evidência como um processo para responder às situações decorrentes da prática clínica diária. Objetivos: adaptar culturalmente o instrumento Health Sciences Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire para a língua portuguesa do Brasil e avaliar suas qualidades psicométricas. Método: Estudo metodológico. A primeira etapa compreendeu o processo de tradução e adaptação transcultural. Na segunda etapa, o instrumento Questionário de Prática Baseada em Evidências e Efetividade Clínica foi aplicado para a validação convergente, utilizando-se o índice de correlação de Pearson, nível de significância 0,05 e realizada Análise Fatorial Confirmatória (AFC), de acordo com o modelo de equações estruturais. A confiabilidade foi avaliada pelo teste-reteste, utilizando o coeficiente de correlação r de Pearson. A consistência interna obtida por meio do coeficiente alpha de Cronbach. Resultados: validade de conteúdo obtida na terceira rodada, título final: Questionário HS-EBP- Prática Baseada em Evidência nas Ciências da Saúde, aplicado em 305 profissionais da saúde. A confiabilidade foi verificada por meio do coeficiente alfa de Cronbach (0,970), similar à versão original, e da estabilidade teste-reteste pelo índice de correlação r de Pearson (r = 0,766) que indicou uma correlação forte. Para a validação convergente foi aplicado o índice de correlação de Pearson (r = 0,683) positivo e com correlação moderada entre os instrumentos. Teste Qui-Quadrado foi significativo (<0,001) para todos os modelos obtidos, em todos os modelos testados. Conclusão: o instrumento mostrou-se válido e confiável para reprodutibilidade na versão brasileira.

Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy Pain in Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: To evaluate neuropathic pain (NP), its intensity, and complications in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a city of eastern São Paulo. Method: Cross-sectional study conducted with 96 individuals with T2DM served by primary health units in São João da Boa Vista-SP. The following instruments were used to screen NP: Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs, Douleur Neuropathique 4, and Brief Pain Inventory. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with a 5 % significance level. Results: Of the 96 people with T2DM for longer than five years, 22.9 % had pain. NP was related to high levels of fasting blood glucose (mean = 214 ± 65.58 mg/dl; p = 0.0002), glycated hemoglobin (mean = 8.8 ± 0.11 %; p < 0.001), absence of a balanced diet (p = 0.0066), obesity (p = 0.023), and high blood pressure (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Higher values ​​of glycated hemoglobin rates increased three times the chance of NP. The screening and management of painful diabetic neuropathy is a challenge but adopting a screening protocol supports the secondary prevention of this manifestation.

Cross-cultural adaptation of Dimensions of Corporate Well-Being Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language

BACKGROUND

The integration of occupational risk management initiatives and health promotion and well-being in the workplace poses a challenge to organizations from different sectors.

OBJECTIVE

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Dimensions of Corporate Well-Being Scorecard (DCWS) to the Brazilian Portuguese language.

METHOD

The process of cross-cultural adaptation of the Dimensions of Corporate Well-Being Scorecard to the Brazilian Portuguese language evolved along six steps: translation, reconciliation, back-translation, revision by internal expert committee, revision by expert panel (pretest) and final revision.

RESULTS

The stringent protocols adopted in the present study resulted in a satisfactory and adequate instrument to analyze programs which target workers' health, safety and well-being at organizations operating in Brazil.

CONCLUSION

The Brazilian version of DCWS, entitled Questionário sobre as Dimensões do Bem-Estar Corporativo (QDBC) represents an advance in the evaluation of the effectiveness of integrated actions for health promotion and workers' well-being in different work environments.

Adaptation of the Multidimensional Pain Evaluation Scale: A Cross-Cultural Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Instruments to measure pain must be cross-culturally adapted through rigorous processes, so they can provide equivalence of measure regardless of the context in which they are applied. The study aim was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of Multidimensional Pain Evaluation Scale (MPES) for use in the United States.

METHODS

Cross-cultural adaptation study entailed translation, back translation, and review by a committee, face and content validity and pilot testing with 90 participants with acute or chronic pain from United States. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated.

RESULTS

Some items of MPES was changed to maintain the highest level of similarity between the original scales in Portuguese and adapted to English.

CONCLUSION

The Cronbach's alpha was high showed this scale has internal consistency and reliability.

Challenges When Translating and Culturally Adapting a Measurement Instrument: The Suitability and Comprehensibility of Materials (SAM+CAM)

There is evidence that low suitability and comprehensibility of printed education materials (PEMs) affects patients’ and relatives’ ability to read and comprehend information. However, few instruments measure the suitability of written information, and none exist in the Swedish language. The aim was to describe the translation and adaptation of the Suitability and Comprehensibility of Materials (SAM+CAM) instrument into the Swedish language and health care context and to explore challenges related to this process. The SAM+CAM instrument was translated and culturally adapted in five steps: forward translation, synthesis, back translation, expert review, and pretests. Differences were found when translating and culturally adapting the SAM+CAM instrument in the areas of semantic, idiomatic, and experiences. Participants revealed several clarity inconsistencies between items. They also identified linguistic differences and unfamiliar wording; they found that the instrument was perplexing to use and lacked knowledge regarding the specific health care areas in the examined PEMs. The cultural perspective is a significant factor that influences the usability of PEMs. Therefore, expert groups of participants are useful when adapting instruments to different cultures. The Swedish SAM+CAM instrument requires experienced and highly qualified raters.

Pre-validation Study of the Brazilian Version of the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) as a Safety Tool in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Introduction

Most risk stratification scores used in surgery do not include external and non-technical factors as predictors of morbidity and mortality.

Objective

The present study aimed to translate and adapt transculturally the Brazilian version of the Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) questionnaire, which was developed to capture the self-perception of each member of the surgical team regarding the disruptions that may contribute to error and obstruction of safe surgical flow.

Methods

A universalist approach was adopted to evaluate the conceptual equivalence of items and semantics, which included the following stages: (1) translation of the questionnaire into Portuguese; (2) back translation into English; (3) panel of experts to draft the preliminary version; and (4) pre-test for evaluation of verbal comprehension by the target population of 43 professionals working in cardiothoracic surgery.

Results

The questionnaire was translated into Portuguese and its final version with 29 items obtained 89.6% approval from the panel of experts. The target population evaluated all items as easy to understand. The mean overall clarity and verbal comprehension observed in the pre-test reached 4.48 ± 0.16 out of the maximum value of 5 on the psychometric Likert scale.

Conclusion

Based on the methodology used, the experts' analysis and the results of the pre-test, it is concluded that the essential stages of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of DiSI to the Portuguese language were satisfactorily fulfilled in this study.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the drug-taking confidence questionnaire drug version for use in Brazil

BACKGROUND

The Drug-Taking Confidence Questionnaire evaluates a drug user's confidence in his or her ability to resist the urge to consume psychoactive substances in high-risk situations. This study's objective was to develop a cross-cultural adaptation of the eight-item version of the Drug-Taking Confidence Questionnaire (DTCQ-8) for all drugs except alcohol and to verify its content validity and reliability in a pre-test stage.

METHODS

The following steps were taken: (1) implementation of the translation protocol and transcultural adaptation, (2) validation of the adapted content, and (3) assessment of reliability. Nine experts participated in the process of adaptation, and the trial's sample comprised 40 drug users in treatment at a Psychosocial Care Center for Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAPSad).

RESULTS

The average indices of semantic agreement (0.989; 0.989; 1.00), idiomatic (0.967), experiential (0.956), conceptual (0.978) and content validity with respect to language clarity (0.972), practice relevance (0.958), theoretical relevance (0.958) and theoretical dimension (1.00) showed that the adaption was successful. The mean total score of the DTCQ-8 version for other drugs was 477.00 + 234.27-SD, and 57.5 % of the users were classified as having moderate self-efficacy to resist the urge to use drugs in high-risk situations. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.889 for the complete instrument and 0.863-0.890 between items.

CONCLUSIONS

The DTCQ-8 version for other drugs proved to be easy to use and understand, and its process of adaptation was satisfactory for use in the Brazilian context. In this sample, the questionnaire was adequate to measure users' self-efficacy to resist the urge to consume these substances in high-risk situations.