Posterior quadratus lumborum versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study

Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery with Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) emerging as potential techniques. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023445513).

RESULTS

We included five RCTs encompassing 255 patients. QLB was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative pain (MD -0.45; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.14; and p = 0.004; I2  = 94%). However, we found no difference in 24-h opioid consumption between QLB and TAPB groups.

CONCLUSION

QLB may offer superior pain reduction. However, its effect on opioid consumption remains unclear.

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block and Ilioinguinal-Iliohypogastric Nerve Block in Paediatric Patients After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (IIIHB) in paediatric patients who have undergone unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled study was designed in a single center and included 60 paediatric patients aged 2-7 years who had undergone inguinal hernia repair surgery and received an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1-2. Patients were randomized into two groups: those receiving ultrasound-guided QLB and those receiving IIIHB. The primary outcomes of the study were patients' face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery.

Results

The mean heart rate 15 and 30 minutes post-surgery in the QLB group was lower than that of the IIIHB group, and the difference at both times was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean FLACC score of the QLB group was lower than that of the IIIHB group at 6, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.004, P=0.006, and P < 0.001, respectively). Between the groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who were administered rescue analgesics or oral ibuprofen, the time of first ibuprofen administration, or the frequency of complications (P=1.000, P=0.145, P=0.195, and P=1.000, respectively).

Conclusion

Compared with IIIHB, QLB achieves superior postoperative analgesic effects in paediatric patients who have undergone inguinal hernia surgery, as evidenced by longer analgesic periods, lower pain scores, and lower analgesic consumption.

Transversus abdominis plane block vs quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The present review was designed to differentiate between the analgesic value of transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) vs the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, Open gray, and a clinical trial registry were searched up to 18th February 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP and QLB for inguinal hernia repair.

RESULTS

Six RCTs from India, Turkey, and Norway published between the years 2019 to 2023 were included. Anesthetic agents and dosages were similar for TAP and QLB groups in each study. On meta-analysis, pain scores were not statistically significant different between TAP and QLB at 3-6 h (MD: 0.46 95% CI: -0.11, 1.03 I2 = 86%), 12 h (MD: 1.34 95% CI: -0.12, 2.80 I2 = 97%), and 24 h (MD: 0.38 95% CI: -0.77, 1.53 I2 = 97%). Meta-analysis of total analgesic consumption showed a tendency of reduced analgesic consumption with QLB as compared to TAP but the difference was not significant (SMD: 0.69 95% CI: 0.00, 1.37 I2 = 83%). Data on complications was scarcely available. GRADE assessment of the evidence was low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Low to moderate-quality preliminary evidence suggests no difference in the analgesic efficacy of TAP and QLB for adult patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. While there was a tendency for lower postoperative analgesic consumption with QLB, it needs to be verified by future studies.