Compliance with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol recommendations for bariatric surgery in an obesity treatment center

Impact of surgical complications on hospital costs and revenues: retrospective database study of Medicare claims

Aim: To compare the length of stay, hospital costs and hospital revenues for Medicare patients with and without a subset of potentially preventable postoperative complications after major noncardiac surgery. Materials & methods: Retrospective data analysis using the Medicare Standard Analytical Files, Limited Data Set, 5% inpatient claims files for years 2016-2020. Results: In 74,103 claims selected for analysis, 71,467 claims had no complications and 2636 had one or more complications of interest. Claims with complications had significantly longer length of hospital stay (12.41 vs 3.95 days, p < 0.01), increased payments to the provider ($34,664 vs $16,641, p < 0.01) and substantially higher estimates of provider cost ($39,357 vs $16,158, p < 0.01) compared with claims without complications. This results on average in a negative difference between payments and costs for patients with complications compared with a positive difference for claims without complications (-$4693 vs $483, p < 0.01). Results were consistent across three different cost estimation methods used in the study. Conclusion: Compared with patients without postoperative complications, patients developing complications stay longer in the hospital and incur increased costs that outpace the increase in received payments. Complications are therefore costly to providers and payers, may negatively impact hospital profitability, and decrease the quality of life of patients. Quality initiatives aimed at reducing complications can be immensely valuable for both improving patient outcomes and hospital finances.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Bariatric Surgery Leads to Decreased Complications and Shorter Length of Stay

PURPOSE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown in some specialties to improve short-term outcomes following surgical procedures. There is no consensus regarding the optimal perioperative care for bariatric surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a bariatric ERAS protocol and determine whether it improved outcomes following surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An IRB-approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery from October 2018 to January 2020. Propensity matching was used to compare post-ERAS implementation patients to pre-ERAS implementation.

RESULTS

There were 319 patients (87 ERAS, 232 pre-ERAS) who underwent bariatric operations between October 2018 and January 2020. Seventy-nine patients were kept on the ERAS protocol whereas 8 deviated. Patients who deviated from the ERAS protocol had a longer length of stay when compared to patients who completed the protocol. The use of any ERAS protocol (completed or deviated) reduced the odds of complications by 54% and decreased length of stay by 15%. Furthermore, patients who completed the ERAS protocol had an 83% reduction in odds of complications and 31% decrease in length of stay. Similar trends were observed in the matched cohort with 74% reduction in odds of complications and 26% reduction in length of stay when ERAS was used.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS protocol decreases complications and reduces length of stay in bariatric patients.