Comparison between qualitative and real-time polymerase chain reaction to evaluate minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections

Among the treatment-related acute toxic effects, risks for bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with several variables. The authors carried out a retrospective cohort study with 259 children and adolescents with ALL, treated with the GBTLI-LLA 2009 protocol, in order to assess the incidence of BSIs in the induction phase; to determine the risk factors for these BSIs; and to identify the related microorganisms and sensitivity profile of the microorganisms related to these infections. BSIs were documented in 19.3% of patients. The isolated microorganisms were 39 Gram-negative bacteria, 21 Gram-positive bacteria, and four fungi. There was a statistically significant risk of BSI between the variables: protocol for T-line-derived leukemia (Derived T Protocol) (p = 0.020), oral manifestations (p = 0.015), central venous catheter (p = 0.008), and bladder catheter (p = 0.004). BSI is a frequent event in ALL patients during the induction phase. The identification of these factors can allow the elaboration and improvement of strategies for the intensification of supportive care, prevention, and rapid treatment of infections.

Comparison between flow cytometry and standard PCR in the evaluation of MRD in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the GBTLI LLA - 2009 protocol

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is of prognostic importance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The detection of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) is considered the gold standard for this evaluation. However, more accessible methods also show satisfactory performance. This study aimed to compare MRD analysis by four-color flow cytometry (FC) and qualitative standard PCR on days 35 and 78 of chemotherapy and to correlate these data with patients' clinical characteristics. Forty-two children with a recent diagnosis of ALL, admitted to a public hospital in Brazil for treatment in accordance with the Brazilian Childhood Cooperative Group for ALL Treatment (GBTLI LLA-2009), were included. Bone marrow samples collected at diagnosis and on days 35 and 78 of treatment were analyzed for the immunophenotypic characterization of blasts by FC and for the detection of clonal rearrangements by standard PCR. Paired analyses were performed in 61/68 (89.7%) follow-up samples, with a general agreement of 88.5%. Disagreements were resolved by RT-PCR, which evidenced one false-negative and four false-positive results in FC, as well as two false-negative results in PCR. Among the prognostic factors, a significant association was found only between T-cell lineage and MRD by standard PCR. These results show that FC and standard PCR produce similar results in MRD detection of childhood ALL and that both methodologies may be useful in the monitoring of disease treatment, especially in regions with limited financial resources.

Current Strategies for the Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer in children. Current treatment strategies for childhood ALL result in long-term remission for approximately 90% of patients. However, the therapeutic response is worse among those who relapse. Several risk stratification approaches based on clinical and biological aspects have been proposed to intensify treatment in patients with high risk of relapse and reduce toxicity on those with a greater probability of cure.

The detection of residual leukemic cells (minimal residual disease, MRD) is the most important prognostic factor to identify high-risk patients, allowing redefinition of chemotherapy. In the last decades, several standardized research protocols evaluated MRD using immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and/or real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction at different time points during treatment. Both methods are highly sensitive (10⁻³ a 10⁻⁵), but expensive, complex, and, because of that, require qualified staff and frequently are restricted to reference centers.

The aim of this article was to review technical aspects of immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to evaluate MRD in ALL.