Characteristics of iatrogenic mandibular fractures associated with tooth removal: review and analysis of 189 cases

Iatrogenic Mandibular Ramus Fracture Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Third Molar

Surgical removal of an impacted tooth is considered to be one of the most frequently performed minor oral surgical procedures due to the plethora of indications associated with it. Like any other surgical intervention, the surgical removal of impacted third molars is also associated with numerous complications. Lot of emphasis has been laid to prevent the complications associated with the surgical removal of impacted third molars. However, at times in spite of delivering the utmost caution, complications occur as a consequence of surgical removal of impacted third molars. We report a rare case in which iatrogenic mandibular ramus fracture occurred in an attempt to surgically removal of an impacted third molar.

Extra-oral approach to lower third molar: a rare surgical indication

The avulsion of the impacted lower third molar is one of the most common procedures in oral surgery. Even though it is characterized by possible complications due to the lesion of lingual and inferior alveolar nerves, the intra-oral surgical approach represents the first-choice strategy when planning surgery. However, in case of ectopic tooth in the mandibular basal bone, it is appropriate to consider an extra-oral transcutaneous surgical approach. The ectopia of the inferior wisdom tooth represents a very rare clinical condition and sometimes it is even unknown by patients and dentists: further evidence of this fact is represented by the paucity of paper related to the topic that can be found in the international scientific literature. The experience of the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of San Gerardo Hospital in Monza (Italy) in management and treatment of ectopic impacted lower third molar is exposed through the presentation of three cases of ectopic third molar. Two out of three patients, aware of the risks related to the surgical procedure, refused the treatment proposed. One patient underwent surgical avulsion of the wisdom tooth through extra-oral transcervical approach. No early or late complications have been observed. Extra-oral surgical approach for ectopic lower third molar should be considered for selected cases. Given the rarity of the clinical condition and the procedure-related risks, accurate preoperative information has to be provided to the patient by physician and the procedure should only be performed by expert and competent surgeons.

A Rare Case of Front Mandible Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Cyst - Surgical Management with Preventive Rigid Osteosynthesis

PURPOSE

Cysts and other intrabony lesions can grow asymptomatic until being diagnosed by occasionally done radiologic examination. Missing tooth and malposition of adjacent teeth should induce clinicians to perform X-Ray diagnostic.

METHODS

A 37-year-old, male patient was admitted with a hopeless tooth 36, to be extracted and replaced with an implant. Clinical examination revealed also missing one of lower incisors and malposition of remaining lower incisors. Cone-beam computed tomography revealed horizontally impacted lower incisor surrounded by bone defect - 15 × 20 × 8 mm with the bone thickness remaining only 3.5 mm in the narrowest area. The basis on strong masticatory muscles and low thickness of bone after surgical removal of tooth and lesion, prophylactic osteosynthesis was planned. To explain the surgery to the patient model of the mandible was 3D printed.

RESULTS

Two treatment plans were presented to the patient: 1. custom plate production according to the bone defect and the shape of remaining bone and 2. choosing a standard plate and adjusting it on the 3D printed model. Costs of the material were 10 times higher in a custom solution. Plan 2 was then accepted. 1.2 mm straight plate was prebend on the model and sterilized. Lesion and impacted tooth were removed in local anesthesia. Prepared plates were fixed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presented case custom 3D printed osteosynthesis plate was about 10 times more expensive compared to the standard osteosynthesis plate used. 3D printing of bone model may be helpful for prebending chosen standard plate and planning the surgery.

Iatrogenic Fracture of the Lower Jaw: A Rare Complication of Lower Molar Extraction

Iatrogenic mandible fracture is a rare complication of a tooth extraction with an incidence between 0.0033-0.0034%. This study retrospectively analyzes a total of 8 patients who underwent lower molar extraction associated with mandible fracture during tooth removal in the period from April 2006 to March 2019. The assessed parameters were age and sex of patients, method of tooth extraction, side distribution of fracture, type of extracted tooth, the position of a lower third molar, presence of bone pathological lesion formed in connection with a tooth, displacement of bone fragments, and sensory impairment in the innervation area of the mental nerve. The position and impaction of the lower third molars were evaluated according to Pell and Gregory's classification and Winter's classification. One fracture was left-sided, and 7 fractures were right-sided. In 6 cases, Winter's extraction elevator was used. In 7 patients, the mandible fracture was treated surgically by performing stable osteosynthesis with the plates and screws. One patient was treated conservatively. This work analyzes the causes of iatrogenic mandible fractures and provides recommendations to reduce the risk of their occurrence.

Pycnodysostosis: a case report and literature review concerning oral and maxillofacial complications and their management

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of knowledge regarding pycnodysostosis (PYCD), which is commonly misdiagnosed as other, similar malformations. This study aims to report a patient with PYCD and conjointly present a comprehensive literature review regarding oral complications after oral surgery procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

This study aims to report a noteworthy case of a 40-year-old woman with PYCD who suffered from a midface defect after iatrogenic fracture during extraction of the upper right molars. A comprehensive electronic search was carried out in January 2020 for detection and analysis of the most commonly encountered dentoalveolar PYCD-related complications. The study was granted an exemption from the local institutional review board.

RESULTS

The electronic search yielded 35 articles reporting 41 PYCD cases with 62 various reported dentoalveolar complications. The survey reported a prevalence of osteomyelitis (n = 39) followed by pathologic fracture (n = 17), iatrogenic fracture (n = 5), and oronasal communication (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

This study advocates handling patients with PYCD with care through the use of extensive clinical and radiographic examinations, giving priority to any conservative treatment modalities, atraumatic surgical procedures, prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions, and a regular follow-up schedule to tackle any anticipated complications.

Buccal corticotomy using piezosurgery as a surgical approach for removal of deeply impacted mandibular teeth: An alternative procedure to avoid pitfalls associated with the conventional technique

PURPOSE

To describe and evaluate the use of buccal corticotomy (BC) using a piezosurgical approach for the removal of deeply impacted mandibular teeth.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of all patients who underwent BC for the removal of impacted mandibular teeth between 2011 and 2019 at the University Hospital of Geneva were reviewed. The primary outcome variables were (1) the indication for the removal of impacted mandibular teeth by BC, (2) complications. Other variables included age, gender, teeth involved, indication for tooth removal and radiological features. Follow-up was at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and we noted the status of healing and complications, if any.

RESULTS

Twenty-three mandibular-impacted teeth in 6 patients were extracted using BC (8 third molars, 6 second molars, 1 first molar, 4 second premolars and 4 first premolars). The indications for using the BC approach included (1) deeply impacted teeth closely related to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) that runs either lingually or inferior to the dental roots (4 patients); or (2) deeply impacted teeth closely related to the IAN and located anterior to the second molar region (2 patients). No complications were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that the BC approach is a valuable method for removing deeply impacted teeth in close proximity to the mandibular canal and is associated with no complications and sound bone healing.

Management of Impacted Third Molars

Impacted third molars occur in a significant number of patients and often require treatment because of presence of symptoms and/or disease. Management of these teeth typically involves referral to oral and maxillofacial surgeons for diagnosis, treatment planning, and ultimate removal if indicated. Proper diagnosis and treatment planning helps optimize surgical results at each stage of the procedure, and ultimately patient outcomes. Adherence to proper surgical techniques helps minimize risks and complications associated with the procedure. Multiple alternative surgical techniques also exist for uncommon, but potentially complicated, situations that arise with some impacted third molars.

Complications of Dentoalveolar Surgery

This article explores how to prevent and manage complications of dentoalveolar surgery. Many complications are avoidable. Surgical skills and knowledge of anatomy play an important role in prevention of complications. Prevention starts with detailed history and physical examination of the patient. Key to perioperative management of patients is risk assessment. Without a proper history and physical examination, the clinician is unable to assess the risk of performing surgery and anesthesia for each patient. Some illnesses and medications increase the risk of complications. The following complications are discussed: alveolar osteitis, displacement, fracture, hemorrhage, infection, nonhealing wound, oroantral communication, swelling, and trismus.

Prophylactic Internal Fixation to Avoid Mandible Fracture With Third Molar Removal: Use of Computer-Assisted Surgery to Improve Clinical Outcomes

Although uncommon, iatrogenic fractures of the mandible may occur during the perioperative time period of a lower third molar removal. The case described used digital technology to apply prophylactic internal fixation before a lower third molar removal thought to be at high risk for a mandible fracture. A medical model of the patient's mandible was 3-dimensionally printed and used as a reference to prebend a titanium plate. Dynamic navigation, a form of computer-assisted surgery, was used during the surgery to accurately place the prebent titanium plate according to the corresponding position on the medical model.

Factors Influencing the Localization of Mandibular Third Molars in Twins

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the genetic and environmental factors influencing the localization of mandibular third molars by analyzing the panoramic radiographs of twins. We examined the mandibular third molars of Japanese monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins recruited by the Osaka University Center for Twin Research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study included 49 pairs (98 participants) of MZ twins and 11 pairs (22 participants) of DZ twins. Using panoramic radiography, we evaluated the degree of eruption of mandibular third molars according to the height of the alveolus bone and the third molar space/crown width ratio. Using co-twin control analysis and a generalized linear mixed model, we evaluated the effects of various factors, including gender, age, body height, number of teeth, length of the lower dental arch, existence of a second molar, bruxism, and previous orthodontic therapy.

RESULTS

Body height, third molar space/crown width ratio, and length of the mandibular dental arch were related to the degree of mandibular third molar eruption and were strongly influenced by genetic factors rather than common or unique environmental factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of third molar eruption was more similar among MZ twins than among DZ twins; therefore, genetic factors can be expected to have more significant influence than will environmental factors. These results can help identify the trend of third molar eruption from a young age, allowing us to advise the early extraction of mandibular third molars for patients with a short stature, narrow retromolar space, or short mandibular dental arch. In addition, if the genes that influence the degree of eruption were identified, we would be better equipped to predict an individual's risk of impaction, and indications for extraction might change.

Simultaneous surgery of mandibular reduction and impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A retrospective study of 65 cases

A considerable number of patients with prominent mandibular angle have mandibular third molar impaction that needs surgical removal. Mandibular reduction is a popular and effective surgery to correct prominent mandibular angle, but it has been rarely performed simultaneously with impacted third molar extraction. In order to decrease the number of operations and suffering of patients, safely performing these 2 operations together is necessary and important. From January 2016 to June 2018, patients received mandibular reduction and impacted mandibular third molar extraction together were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-seven patients receiving long-curve mandibular reduction (n = 12) or simple mandibular reduction (n = 35) were included in this study. A total of 65 impacted mandibular third molars were extracted during mandibular reduction. One patient had hematoma within facial soft tissue which reabsorbed spontaneously. Seven patients who underwent long-curve mandibular reduction reported transient inferior lip numbness for several weeks. No infection or poor wound healing was reported. No immediate or delayed mandibular fracture occurred. All the patients were satisfied with both the aesthetic result of mandibular reduction and the unnecessity of receiving a secondary surgery to extract the impacted third molar. Simultaneously performing mandibular reduction and impacted mandibular third molar extraction can effectively reduce the number of operations and patients' suffering. It is also safe with adequate pre-op assessment, professional surgical knowledge, proper use of surgical instruments, meticulous surgical procedures, and correct post-op care.

Clinical application of flap or flapless buccal surgery on the extractions of mesially/horizontally impacted 3rd molar with high or medium position impact: A comparative study

PURPOSE

To investigate and compare the clinical application of flap or flapless buccal surgery on the extractions of mesially/horizontally impacted 3rd molar with high or medium position impact in terms of the average surgery duration, number of root fracture, postoperative pain degree and duration, postoperative swelling degree and duration, degree of limitation of mouth opening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted of 28 patients who were examined and underwent bilateral extraction of impacted mandibular 3rd molar. One molar was randomly extracted with flap buccal surgery (Control Group, CG) and the other one with flapless buccal surgery (Experimental Group, EG) in the same patient.

RESULTS

Gender distribution, average age, average surgery duration and number of root fracture between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The postoperative pain degree, swelling degree and degree of limitation of mouth opening were all significantly greater in CG than EG. Moreover, the duration of postoperative pain and swelling were all were all significantly longer in CG than EG (0.01<P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the flap buccal surgery on the extractions of mesially/horizontally impacted 3rd molar with high or medium position impact, the clinical use of the flapless buccal surgery is a safe and effective method with less swelling, pain and degree of limitation of mouth opening. However, we need further study based on the broader indications, a much larger number of patients included and a follow-up in the longer term to confirm our point.

Extraction of impacted third molar with preventive installation of titanium miniplate: Case report

Introduction

Even though is rarely, mandibular fracture after the extraction of third molars can occur in almost 1% of the procedures. Gender, age, position of third molar, tooth volume, bone fragility, systemic disorders, associated lesions, and degree of mandibular atrophy are factors that contribute to increase the incidence of fracture. The installation of the titanium miniplate during exodontia is an important tool to prevent the fracture.

Presentation of case

The objective of this study is to present a clinical case of extraction of inferior impacted third molar, in atrophic mandible, with posterior installation of titanium miniplate, to prevent mandibular fracture.

Discussion and conclusion

preventive installation of titanium miniplate was effective and indeed prevented the mandibular fracture. No trans-operative or immediate post-operative complications were observed. Post-operative follow-up was of three years, with no complications, showing the success of the procedure.

•

This study will instruct surgeons on third molar surgery in atrophic mandible.

•

It will allow surgeons to avoid mandibular fracture, by installing titanium plate.

•

It will ensure the procedure is safe and well conducted for the patients.

Osteomyelitis of the Mandible Caused by Late Fracture following Third Molar Extraction

The common postoperative complications of the extraction of third molars are frequently reported; however, reports about osteomyelitis of the mandible caused by late fracture following third molar extraction are rare. Here, we report a case of osteomyelitis of the mandible caused by late fracture following third molar extraction. A 38-year-old Japanese man was referred to the surgery department with chief complaints of dull pain and swelling in the right masseteric region and paresthesia of his lower lip and mental region in March 2018. A family dentist removed his lower third molar in the right side in January 2018. When the patient was chewing an innards stew 23 days after the procedure, he heard a cracking sound from the right mandible. Thus, we diagnosed the patient as having osteomyelitis of the mandible caused by late fracture following third molar extraction and performed sequestrectomy and curettage under general anesthesia in April 2018. In conclusion, it is necessary to recognize the possibility that late fracture following third molar extraction can cause osteomyelitis. Furthermore, once osteomyelitis of the mandible caused by late fracture occurred, early and appropriate treatment is necessary because the osteomyelitis may progress rapidly and in some cases may result in pathological fracture.

Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above

BACKGROUND

The prophylactic extraction of asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molar is a contentious issue in dental practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate symptomatic impacted mandibular third molars in patients 50 years and above, and determine the burden of the impaction on the adjacent second molar.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical study over a three-year period. The diagnosis of impacted mandibular third molar and their associated pathology was made by clinical and radiological examination. The data obtained were age, sex, type of impaction, reason for surgical extraction, and the clinical condition of the adjacent second molar.

RESULTS

Patients 50 years and above were 33.4%, and those with impaction 22.8%, while the symptomatic cases were in 18.4% patients. The age of the patients ranged from 52 to 84 years with male: female ratio, 2.3:1. In all the asymptomatic impactions, the adjacent second molars were disease-free, whereas 73.6% of the adjacent second molar related to symptomatic cases were asymptomatic (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that 15.9% of impactions in 18.4% of patients were symptomatic and required surgical extraction, whereas the burden of impaction on the adjacent second molar was 26.4%, and these required only preventive and restorative treatments.

Extending Coronectomy Indications to Third Molars with Taurodontism to Prevent Paresthesia and Mandible Fracture

Taurodontism is considered a dental anomaly responsible for a morphoanatomical change in the shape of the tooth in which the roots are reduced in size but the body of the tooth is enlarged and bulky. The aim of this paper is to present a case of a 25-year-old female patient with taurodontism of mandibular partially erupted third molars, presenting a high risk of angle fracture and paresthesia in case of their removal, treated by means of coronectomy. The postoperative period was uneventful and the patient remained in follow-up for 12 months. In conclusion, the identification of third molars with higher risk of complications related to their extractions is the key to consider conservative measures to avoid problems. Coronectomy is a relatively simple technique that should be taken into account when considering bulky, deeply located third molars with a high risk of paresthesia or mandibular fracture, even in presence of taurodontism.

Anatomical and Radiological Investigation of Dry Bone Adult Mandibles Having Impacted Third Molar Teeth

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of the impacted mandibular third molars in dry bones adult mandibles.

METHODS

The 198 dry bones adult mandibles gathered from the bone collections in Laboratory of the Anatomy Department of Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine were macroscopically examined for the presence of impacted mandibular third molars. The genders of the adult bones were unknown. The adult mandibles having impacted third molars were photographed with Canon 400B (55 mm objective). The mandibles having impacted third molars were also radiographically examined with orthopantomography (a dental radiographic technique, kV 60, mA 2.0) in radiology unit of Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University. The impacted teeth were grouped according to their position and degree of impaction.

RESULTS

The each of 2 of 198 adult mandibles (2/198; 1.01%) was having an impacted 3rd molar teeth. These 2 molar teeth were belonged to class 1, B and partially buried, vertically oriented. The first impacted 3rd molar teeth was located on the left side of the one mandible and the second one on the right side of the other mandible.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides information about impacted mandibular 3rd molar in dry bones.

Is The Late Mandibular Fracture From Third Molar Extraction a Risk Towards Malpractice? Case Report with the Analysis of Ethical and Legal Aspects

Objectives

The present study reports a case of late mandibular fracture due to third molar extraction and highlights the inherent clinical, ethical and legal aspects related to this surgical complication.

Material and Methods

A female patient underwent surgical procedure for the extraction of the mandibular right third molar. Two days after the surgery the patient reported pain and altered occlusion in the right side of the mandible. After clinical and radiographic re-examination, the diagnosis of late mandibular fracture was established. A second surgery, under general anaesthesia, was performed for the fixation of the mandibular bone.

Results

The fractured parts were reduced and fixed with locking plate systems and 2 mm screws following load-sharing principles. The masticatory function showed optimal performance within 7 and 21 days after the surgery. Complete bone healing was observed within 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusions

For satisfactory surgical outcomes, adequate surgical planning and techniques must be performed. Signed informed consents explaining the risks and benefits of the treatment must be used to avoid ethical and legal disputes in dentistry.

Late mandibular fracture occurring in the postoperative period after third molar removal: systematic review and analysis of 124 cases

Factors associated with the diagnosis, aetiology, and treatment of mandibular fractures occurring during the postoperative period following the removal of a lower third molar are discussed. The following databases were searched using specific key words: PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, and Scopus. The search yielded 124 cases. Sex, age, side, tooth position and angulation, bone impaction, relationship between the tooth and the inferior alveolar nerve, local pathological conditions, aetiology of the fracture, symptomatology, and time between surgery and fracture, as well as any displacement of the fracture and the treatment of the fracture, were evaluated. Data were tabulated and the χ² statistical test was applied (P<0.05). Male patients aged >35 years, with teeth in positions II/III and B/C, complete bony impaction, and local bone-like alterations, were found to have a higher frequency of fracture and pericoronitis (P<0.05). Late fractures generally occurred between the second and fourth postoperative weeks (P<0.05). They were generally not displaced and the typical treatment was the non-surgical approach (P<0.05). It is concluded that the risk of mandibular fracture after extraction is associated with excessive ostectomy and/or local alterations. At-risk patients should be thoroughly briefed on the importance of a proper postoperative diet.

Identifying the risk factors causing iatrogenic mandibular fractures associated with exodontia: a systemic meta-analysis of 200 cases from 1953 to 2015

PURPOSE

Iatrogenic fracture of mandible (IFM) associated with exodontia though rare, they do occur with an incidence ranging from 0.0034 to 0.0075 %. Most of the data is in the form of case reports or a small case series. This is an attempt to amass the data available in literature since the last 62 years. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to identify the etiologies and risk factors leading to IFM associated with exodontia and also the measures to minimize the complication.

METHODS

Articles published between 1953 and 2015 were searched in Medline database. Data was collected and analyzed based on age, gender, extracted tooth, status of dentition, pathological bone lesion adjacent to the tooth, type of impaction, angulation of the impacted third molar, site of fracture, side of fracture, time of fracture, and treatment of fracture.

RESULTS

A review identified 200 documented cases of IFM associated with the removal of teeth. The reasons for its occurrence found to be multifactorial with a higher incidence in the fifth decade of life with male prevalence. Risk factors more commonly identified were removal of the third molar, fully dentate patient, associated pathology, impacted tooth, angle region, left quadrant, and time interval of 3 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

IFM related to the removal of teeth is a rare complication. Identifying and addressing the risk factors will enable the surgeon to avoid the complication of IFM associated with exodontia.

Surgical extraction of impacted teeth in elderly patients. A retrospective analysis of perioperative complications - the experience of a single institution

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the most frequent complications and assess their overall rate associated with the surgical extraction of impacted teeth in an elderly patient population.

BACKGROUND

Oral health needs of the elders are often associated with surgical procedures for the creation of appropriate conditions for any further prosthetic treatment. One such process is the removal of severely decayed, fractured or impacted teeth detrimental to the fit or appearance of dentures. While broken and decayed teeth leave little doubt for their removal, impacted teeth divide opinion, some extreme regarding their prophylactic removal and the appropriate age for the procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Material was selected from the archives of an Out-Patient Dental Surgery Clinic of the Regional Centre of Dentistry in Szczecin, from 2002 to 2013. The database was independently screened by two investigators according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After selection process, all included records were screened using a data extraction form to obtain the necessary data.

RESULTS

The total number of impacted teeth was 73, of which 29% were partially impacted. The overall complication rate was 24.6%. The most common complications were as follows: haematoma, nerve disturbances and local infections.

CONCLUSION

Surgical extraction in patients above 60 years of age is fraught with a high risk of possible complications.

Iatrogenic mandibular fracture associated with third molar removal after mandibular angle osteotectomy

The extraction of mandibular third molars is a common dental procedure. The complications include hemorrhage, pain, dental fracture, the displacement of teeth or fragments, iatrogenic damage or luxation of the second molar, neurologic injuries, soft tissue damage, subcutaneous emphysema, trismus, swelling, infection, and iatrogenic mandibular fracture. Fracture of the angle of the mandible associated with third molar removal is a rare but severe complication. This article describes a case of mandibular angle fracture associated with third molar extraction after mandibular angle osteotectomy, including a brief review of the literature. The removal of the mandibular angle and the outer cortex of the mandible, especially the external oblique ridge, may contribute to the bone fracture. We conclude that the extraction of the lower third molar must be before the removal of the mandibular angle, and a soft diet for at least 4 weeks postoperatively is essential to prevent late mandible fracture.

Unerupted lower third molar extractions and their risks for mandibular fracture

As every surgical procedure extraction of third molars can result in several complications, among them the mandibular angle fracture. Predisposing factors for fracture should be analyzed during and after the surgery. This paper aims to discuss the predisposing factors to the occurrence of mandibular angle fractures during and after the procedure for third molars extraction, as well as surgical principles to avoid this complication.

A review of oral surgery-related papers published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during 2011 and 2012

This paper is a synopsis of all articles relating to oral surgery that were published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS) between January 2011 and December 2012. Of the 57 published, 40 (70%) were full-length articles that predominantly focused on implantology, dentoalveolar surgery, and bisphosphonate osteonecrosis of the jaws (BONJs). In addition, a number of short communications, technical notes, and letters to the editor described rare cases, unusual complications, and novel surgical techniques.

Pathological (late) fractures of the mandibular angle after lower third molar removal: a case series

Introduction

Pathological (late) fracture of the mandibular angle after third molar surgery is very rare (0.005% of third molar removals). There are 94 cases reported in the literature; cases associated with osseous pathologies such as osteomyelitis or any local and systemic diseases that may compromise mandibular bone strength have not been included. We describe three new cases of pathological (late) fracture of the mandibular angle after third molar surgery.

Case presentations

The first patient was a 27-year-old Caucasian man who had undergone surgical removal of a 3.8, mesioangular variety, class II-C third molar 20 days before admission to our clinic. The fracture of his left mandibular angle, complete and composed, occurred during chewing. The second patient was a 32-year-old Caucasian man. He had undergone surgical removal of a 3.8, mesioangular variety, class II-B third molar 22 days before his admission. The fracture, which occurred during mastication, was studied by computed tomography that showed reparative tissue in the fracture site. The third patient was a 36-year-old Caucasian man who had undergone surgical removal of a 3.8, vertical variety, class II-C third molar 25 days before the observation. In this case the fracture of his mandibular angle was oblique (unfavorable), complete and composed. The fracture had occurred during chewing. We studied the fracture by optical projection tomography and computed tomography.

All of the surgical removals of the 3.8 third molars, performed by the patients’ dentists who had more than 10 years of experience, were difficult. We treated the fractures with open surgical reduction, internal fixation by titanium miniplates and intermaxillary elastic fixation removed after 6 weeks.

Conclusions

The literature indicates that the risk of pathological (late) fracture of the mandibular angle after third molar surgery for total inclusions (class II-III, type C) is twice that of partial inclusions due to the necessity of ostectomies more generous than those for partial inclusions. Other important factors are the anatomy of the teeth and the features of the teeth roots. These fractures predominantly occur in patients who are older than 25 years. The highest incidence (67.8% of cases) is found in the second and third week postsurgery. We emphasize that before the third molar surgery it is extremely important to always provide adequate instructions to the patient in order to avoid early masticatory loads and prevent this rare event.

Pathological mandibular fractures: a review of the literature of the last two decades

Pathological mandibular fractures are rare, accounting for fewer than 2% of all fractures of the mandible. They could be defined as fractures that occur in regions where bone has been weakened by an underlying pathological process. Pathological fractures usually may follow surgical interventions such as third molar removal or implant placement, result from regions of osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, occur because of idiopathic reasons or be facilitated by cystic lesions, benign, malignant, or metastatic tumors. Pathological mandibular fractures may be challenging to treat because of their different etiology and peculiar local and general conditions, often requiring a more rigid fixation. In patients with poor medical conditions, simpler and more limited options may be preferred.

A review of trauma and trauma-related papers published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2010-2011

This review summarises all trauma and related papers published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS) from January 2010 to December 2011. In total 45 articles were published, of which 42% (19) were full-length articles. These articles primarily focused on the management of mandibular condyle and orbital fractures, with several papers discussing maxillofacial surgery by the British military. There were no articles discussing midfacial fractures or massive facial trauma. The remaining papers included short communications, technical notes, and letters; and provided discussion of interesting cases, new surgical techniques and fracture classifications. The number of trauma papers published in BJOMS appears to be less than other sub-specialties such as head and neck oncology. The number of prospective and randomised studies remains low, highlighting a need to foster further research within maxillofacial trauma.

Full length articles published in BJOMS during 2010-11--an analysis by sub-specialty and study type

Full length articles such as prospective and retrospective studies, case series, laboratory-based research and reviews form the majority of papers published in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS). We were interested to evaluate the breakdown of these types of articles both by sub-specialty and the type of study as well as the proportion that are written by UK colleagues compared to overseas authors over a 2 year period (2010-11). A total of 191 full length articles across all sub-specialties of our discipline were published, with 107 papers (56%) coming from UK authors. There were proportionately more oncology papers arising from the UK than overseas (60 and 30% of total respectively) while the opposite was found for cleft/deformity studies (10% and 22%). There was only one laboratory-based study published from the UK compared with 27 papers from overseas. The number of quality papers being submitted to the Journal continues to increase, and the type of article being published between UK and overseas probably reflects different practices and case-loads amongst colleagues. The relatively few UK laboratory based studies published in BJOMS compared to overseas authors are most likely due to authors seeking the most prestigious journals possible for their work.

Mandibular angle fractures during third molar removal: a report of two cases

Although fracture of the tooth during surgical removal is common, mandibular fracture during lower third molar removal is an unusual and major complication. Possible aetiologies are age, gender, the position of the tooth, uncontrolled excessive force applied, insufficient surgical experience and improper instrumentation. Symptoms can vary widely and treatment options range from prescription of a soft diet to surgical treatment by open reduction and internal fixation. We present two cases of the treatment and follow-up of fracture of the angle region of the mandible during removal.

Iatrogenic mandibular fracture associated with third molar removal

Third molar extraction is one of the most common procedures performed in oral and maxillofacial surgery units. It is sometimes accompanied by complications such as alveolar osteitis, secondary infection, hemorrhage, dysesthesia and, most severely, iatrogenic fracture. This article describes two mandibular angle fractures that occurred in two patients during the surgical extraction of one erupted and one unerupted third molar, including a brief review of the literature.