Periosteal ossification of the vascular pedicle after reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible and the maxilla with fibular free flaps: A retrospective study

In search of the ideal periosteal flap for bone non-union: The chimeric fibula-periosteal flap

Vascularised periosteal flaps may increase the union rates in recalcitrant long bone non-union. The fibula-periosteal chimeric flap utilises the periosteum raised on an independent periosteal vessel. This allows the periosteum to be inset freely around the osteotomy site, thereby facilitating bone consolidation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients underwent fibula-periosteal chimeric flaps (2016-2022) at the Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, UK. Preceding non-union 18.6 months, with mean bone gap of 7.5 cm. Patients underwent preoperative CT angiography to identify the periosteal branches. A case-control approach was used. Patients acted as their own controls, with one osteotomy covered by the chimeric periosteal flap and one without, although in two patients both the osteotomies were covered using a long periosteal flap.

RESULTS

A chimeric periosteal flap was used in 12 of the 20 osteotomy sites. Periosteal flap osteotomies had a primary union rate of 100% (11/11) versus those without flaps at 28.6% (2/7) (p = 0.0025). Union occurred in the chimeric periosteal flaps at 8.5 months versus 16.75 months in the control group (p = 0.023). One case was excluded from primary analysis due to recurrent mycetoma. The number needed to treat = 2, indicating that 2 patients would require a chimeric periosteal flap to avoid one non-union. Survival curves with a hazard ratio of 4.1 were observed, equating to a 4 times higher chance of union with periosteal flaps (log-rank p = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

The chimeric fibula-periosteal flap may increase the consolidation rates in difficult cases of recalcitrant non-union. This elegant modification of the fibula flap uses periosteum that is normally discarded, and this adds to the accumulating data supporting the use of vascularised periosteal flaps in non-union.

Heterotopic ossification in a soft tissue free flap vascular pedicle: a case report

To our knowledge this is the first described case of HO of the pedicle of a RAFF, and the first description of HO after cleft palate reconstruction. We speculate that inflammatory stimulus related to an emergent operation to arrest postoperative haemorrhage may have contributed to this unusual complication. This case sheds further light on both the pathophysiological mechanisms of HO development, as well as broadens the clinical setting where HO can be encountered.

Fibula Free Flap Reconstruction of the Maxilla Leading to Extracapsular Ankylosis of the Mandible

After en bloc resection of the maxilla or mandible, surgeons may choose to replace the missing bone and soft tissue with a fibula free flap (FFF). One of the complications that may arise during the healing of an FFF is heterotopic ossification along the free flap pedicle. Heterotopic ossification is most often noted incidentally on postoperative radiographs and rarely creates a functional deficit. Subperiosteal dissection of the pedicle from the bone during the harvest of the FFF is believed to be the main contributing factor that leads to this formation of bone along the flap soft tissue. Pain or limitation of movement of the jaws, depending on where heterotopic bone forms are related functional issues. Changes in facial appearance due to expansion related to this phenomenon of bone deposition may also occur. This paper presents a patient that developed a functional deficit secondary to heterotopic ossification of an FFF that required surgical intervention. The goal of our surgery is to maintain the blood supply to a vascularized flap while removing the heterotopic bone. We will present the unique aspects of planning this challenging surgery: CASE: A 40-year-old man with a history of right posterior maxillary ameloblastoma underwent a hemi-maxillectomy with FFF reconstruction. The patient developed extracapsular heterotopic bone ankylosis beginning 2 months postoperatively developing severe trismus and required surgical intervention. Radiographic imaging revealed extensive heterotopic ossification of the vascular pedicle that extended from the most proximal positioned end of the fibula to the inferior lateral border of the mandible. A radiographic computed tomography with contrast imaging revealed an intact vascular pedicle with surrounding heterotopic bone. Virtual planning and stereolithic modeling were utilized to plan the heterotopic bone removal. In the operating room, we removed the heterotopic bone in small segments according to the virtual plan to avoid injuring the vascular pedicle. A coronoidectomy was also performed to help gain more range of motion. An adipofascial flap using the buccal fat pad was raised into the area of defect to prevent future recurrence. The patient was put on a strict physical therapy regimen to help regain his range of motion. CONCLUSION: Heterotopic ossifications along free flap pedicles are a known complication of the FFF. A conservative management approach should be used since most postoperative patients will be asymptomatic and findings are incidental on postoperative imaging. Surgery should be reserved for symptomatic patients. Heterotopic ossification needs to be considered as a differential in a microvascular reconstruction postoperative patient when the patient presents with a slow onset of facial swelling, neck mass, or trismus. Virtual planning is an essential tool in the surgeon's planning armamentarium dependent on the timing of the procedure so that the vascular integrity of the flap can be protected after the initial anastomosis.

Head and neck radiotherapy-induced changes in dentomaxillofacial structures detected on panoramic radiographs: A systematic review

Purpose

This study aimed to summarize the impact of neck and head radiation treatment on maxillofacial structures detected on panoramic radiographs.

Materials and Methods

In this systematic review, the authors searched PubMed Central, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for original research studies up to February 2020 that included the following Medical Subject Headings keywords: words related to “radiotherapy” and synonyms combined with keywords related to “panoramic radiography” and “oral diagnosis” and synonyms. Only original studies in English that investigated the maxillofacial effects of radiotherapy via panoramic radiographs were included. The quality of the selected manuscripts was evaluated by assessing the risk of bias using Cochrane's ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies.

Results

Thirty-three studies were eligible and included in this review. The main objectives pertained to the assessment of the effects of radiation on maxillofacial structures, including bone architecture alterations, periodontal space widening, teeth development abnormalities, osteoradionecrosis, and implant bone loss. The number of participants evaluated ranged from 8 to 176.

Conclusion

The interaction between ionizing radiation and maxillofacial structures results in hazard to the tissues involved, particularly the bone tissue, periosteum, connective tissue of the mucosa, and endothelium. Hard tissue changes due to radiation therapy can be detected on panoramic radiographs.

Management of pedicle ossification following free flap reconstruction: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Heterotopic ossification of a vascular pedicle is an uncommon, but established, phenomenon occasionally seen incidentally on post-operative imaging after fibular free flap reconstruction. Symptomatic cases of pedicle ossification, however, are much rarer, with very few cases requiring operative intervention. We present the largest case of pedicle ossification recorded to date, review the literature on symptomatic pedicle ossification, and describe our experience with the surgical management and outcomes of this complication in symptomatic patients.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 60-year-old man with a 7 cm neck mass and neck pain presents six months after fibular free flap reconstruction of an osteonecrotic mandible. CT demonstrates heterotopic ossification of the free flap vascular pedicle. The patient underwent surgical resection of the ossification with preservation of the pedicle and had an uncomplicated post-operative course with resolution of symptoms.

DISCUSSION

While pedicle ossification following fibula free flap surgery appears to be a somewhat common occurrence in the literature, clinically significant and symptomatic cases are rare. Symptomatic pedicle ossification may require secondary surgical intervention if large, painful, or disfiguring. Although there are surgical techniques described which may decrease the incidence of postoperative ossification, the rarity of symptomatic cases may not justify the additional surgical risks created by subperiosteal dissection.

CONCLUSION

Here, we present what appears to be the largest case of pedicle ossification in the literature. We believe this case may aid in the understanding of pedicle ossification and contribute towards a standard treatment protocol in the prevention and treatment of clinically relevant pedicle ossification.

First reported PET positive, FDG avid free flap pedicle ossification and review of the literature

The fibular free flap (FFF) is commonly used for head and neck bony reconstruction. Ossification of the vascular pedicle has been reported but is an uncommon complication of this procedure. Ossification of the pedicle with FDG avidity has not been identified in the literature. Here we present a case of FDG avid free flap ossification seen on PET/CT imaging in a patient who developed trismus after fibular free flap reconstruction of a maxillary defect for a primary squamous cell carcinoma of the palate. The FDG avidity of the free flap ossification and trismus were both concerning for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma.

Heterotopic Ossification of the Vascular Pedicle after Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery Using Fibular Free Flap: Introducing New Classification and Retrospective Analysis

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is one of the described phenomena after maxillofacial reconstructive surgery using fibular free flap (FFF) at the reception-site. The aim of this study was to determine the radiological incidence and form of HO along the fibular vascular pedicle as well as the rate of clinical symptoms if present. CT-scans of 102 patients who underwent jaw reconstructive surgery by using FFF from January 2005 to December 2019 were evaluated concerning the presence of HO. Subsequently, the patient files were evaluated to identify the cases with clinical signs and complications related to the presence of HO. A radiological classification of four different HO types was developed. Out of 102 patients, 29 (28.43%) presented radiological findings of HO. Clinical symptoms were recorded in 10 cases (9.8%) (dysphagia (n = 5), trismus (n = 3), bony masses (n = 2)) and from these only five (4.9%) needed surgical removal of calcified structures. HO occurs significantly in younger patients (mean 52.3 year). In maxillary reconstructions, HO was radiologically visible six months earlier than after mandibular reconstruction. Furthermore, HO is observed after every third maxilla and every fourth mandible reconstruction. This study developed for the first time a classification of four distinct HO patterns. HO types 1 and 2 were mostly observed after mandible reconstruction and type 4 predominantly after maxilla reconstruction.

Ossification of the Vascular Pedicle After Microsurgical Soft Tissue Transfer of the Lateral Upper Arm Free Flap

Reconstruction of intraoral defects is one of the main aspects of head and neck cancer treatment. Since the advent of microvascular surgery in this field, free flap tissue transfer has become a common procedure, and various flaps have been described for soft tissue reconstruction. The lateral upper arm free flap is one of the most frequently used flaps for intraoral defect coverage. This article describes ossification of the corresponding vascular pedicle after soft tissue transfer with the lateral upper arm free flap and microsurgical anastomosis in oral cancer treatment. Similar findings in the context of the lateral upper arm free flap have never been reported in the literature; however, it is important for surgeons to know that pedicle ossification can occur. This knowledge may be helpful to avoid erroneous diagnosis of the ossification as a sign of tumor relapse/recurrence as well as to anticipate potential difficulties in the surgical approach in cases requiring reentry of the reconstructed region, for example, in relapse/recurrence of head and neck cancer.

Incidence of pedicle ossification in osseous free flap reconstruction in the head and neck

BACKGROUND

There are several reports of ossification occurring along the pedicle of fibular free flaps in head and neck microvascular reconstruction, but the incidence of pedicle ossification of other osseous flaps in head and neck surgery has never been investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients undergoing free flap reconstruction in the head and neck between 2005 and 2016. Patients were included if they had reconstruction with an osseous free flap and if they had computed tomography (CT) scans at least 1 month post-operatively. Available CT images were reviewed for each patient.

RESULTS

Three-hundred thirty four osteocutaneous free flaps were performed. The average age was 64 years (range 8-89). There was slight male predominance with 63.5% of the cohort being male (n = 212). One hundred fifty-five patients had fibular flaps (45%), 108 had radial forearm flaps (34%) and 71 had scapular flaps (21%). One hundred fibulas had available imaging, 73 forearms had available imaging, and 44 scapulas had imaging post-operatively. Of the images reviewed, pedicle ossification was identified in 21 fibular flaps (21%). None of the radial forearm or scapular flaps developed pedicle ossification.

DISCUSSION

Pedicle ossification is relatively common in osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction and is uniquely associated with fibular. The presence of pedicle ossification is benign and does not compromise the flap, though it can create concern in cancer surveillance as the lesion is often identified as a new neck mass. As such, head and neck surgeons should be aware of this relatively frequent finding.

Reconstruction of a Complex Foot Injury With Free Remodeled Fibular Osteocutaneous Flap: A Case Report and Literature Review

Management of complex foot injuries, which involve open fractures and severe trauma to soft tissues, represent a challenge to orthopedic clinicians. In the present case report, we treated a complex foot injury with a remodeled fibular osteocutaneous free flap to reconstruct the anterior and lateral areas of the foot. The flap survived completely. At the 9-month follow-up examination, bony union of the graft bone was identified by radiographic examination. The reconstructed foot could bear body weight, and the patient could maintain a bipedal gait without discomfort. The remodeled fibular osteocutaneous free flap provides an option for functional reconstruction of foot defects.

Ossification of the vascular pedicle in microsurgical fibular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The fibular free flap, often used for osseous reconstruction following extirpation of head and neck malignancies, has been associated with heterotopic periosteal ossification. We aimed to determine the frequency and radiologic characteristics of this process and describe its clinical correlates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical records for 2 years and neck imaging reports for 10 years were evaluated to identify patients with fibular free flap reconstruction and CT and/or PET/CT imaging available for review. The images were evaluated for the quality, type, and contour of ossification, and the reports were reviewed for associated clinical findings and radiologic impressions.

RESULTS

Of 32 patients with posttreatment CT or PET/CT imaging, ossification was evident in 16 patients (50%) as early as 1 month following fibular free flap reconstruction. In 8 patients, it mimicked a new bone; in 5, it appeared as linear attenuation; in 2, as multiple short segments; and in 1 patient, a mixed appearance was found. No associated FDG uptake was seen on PET/CT. On MR imaging, these findings were extremely subtle or not appreciable. In only 1 patient was new bone associated with symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Periosteal ossification of the vascular pedicle is commonly evident on CT following fibular free flap, even as early as 1 month after reconstruction, though the finding is not typically noted on imaging. While symptoms related to new bone are uncommon, they may mimic recurrent tumor. The location and pattern of ossification and the absence of a soft-tissue mass or FDG uptake are useful distinguishing imaging features.