Outcomes of open temporomandibular joint surgery following failure to improve after arthroscopy: is there an algorithm for success?

Current thinking in open temporomandibular joint surgery. Is this still indicated in the management of articular temporomandibular joint disorder?

Management of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) follows a stepwise approach of conservative management, minimally invasive surgery (arthrocentesis and arthroscopy), open surgery and alloplastic replacement. The majority of patients treated in primary care and managed initially in secondary care have myofascial pain and can be managed conservatively with rest, topical NSAIDs, muscle massage, and a bite orthosis. Those who fail to improve and have articular related pain with limitation of function should initially undergo arthroscopic investigation and arthrocentesis, which is effective at resolving symptoms in 80% of patients. Arthroscopy provides the best diagnostic aid should there be a failure to improve and should enable the surgeon to appropriately plan open surgery. Historically, surgical intervention was based on a 'one size fits all' philosophy with the surgeon carrying out a procedure which they are used to doing regardless of the pathology. Prior to arthroscopy this carried an '80% chance of getting 80% better' regardless of approach. Prior arthroscopy reduced success rates to 50%-60% and a better success rate is needed. Basing surgical intervention on the pathology encountered is a sensible approach to joint management, with the surgeon performing surgery on the articular surfaces or disc as indicated. Having used this approach over the last 15 years the author has achieved success rates of 80% in the longer term and this philosophy, rationale, and technique will be discussed along with analysis of more recent publications in the field.

Which comorbid conditions and risk factors affect the outcome of and progression to total temporomandibular joint replacement?

Surgery is an effective modality to reduce pain and increase range of motion (ROM) in TMJ disorders. The aim of this study was to determine which comorbidities and risk factors affect outcomes and progression to total joint replacement (TJR). A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent TJR between 2000- 2018 at MGH was conducted. Primary outcome was successful vs unsuccessful surgery. Success was defined as pain score ≤ 4 and ROM ≥ 30 mm; failure was defined as lack of either or both. Secondary outcome was differences between patients undergoing TJR only (group A) and those undergoing multiple surgeries progressing to TJR (group B). 99 patients (82 females, 17 males) were included. Mean follow-up was 4.1 years; mean age at first surgery was 34.2 (range 14-71) years. Unsuccessful outcomes were associated with high preoperative pain, low preoperative ROM, and higher number of surgeries. Male sex favored successful outcome. 75.0% group A and 47.6% group B had successful outcome. Group B had more females, higher postoperative pain, lower postoperative ROM, and used more opioids compared to group A. High preoperative pain, low preoperative ROM, and more surgeries were associated with poorer outcomes and frequent opioid use.

Arthroscopic Disk Repositioning After Failed Open Disk Repositioning

PURPOSE

Open disk repositioning has been long achieving excellent functional and stability outcomes. However, still remains some relapses for whom a second open surgery is often challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic disk reposition as an alternative surgery for unsuccessful cases of anterior disk displacement (ADD) after an initial open disk repositioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent secondary arthroscopy for disk repositioning of the relapsed ADD after an initial open surgery between January 2012 to June 2017. The redo arthroscopic disk repositioning and suturing procedure was the primary predictor input variable in this study. Outcome evaluation was based on both clinical (visual analog scale and maximal interincisal opening) and magnetic resonance imaging data.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven joints fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. A significant improvement was detected at 24-month postoperatively compared with the baseline visual analog scale. The maximal interincisal opening showed a statistical improvement from 25.07 mm preoperatively to 38.44 mm at 24-month postoperatively. Twenty-six joints maintained a stable disk position with only 1 joint relapsed to ADD without reduction.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic disk reposition and suturing technique is a reliable and effective repeat surgery after failed initial open disk repositioning for management of ADD.

Use of the Temporalis Myofascial Flap in Internal Derangement of the Temporomandibular Joint - An Evaluative Study

Introduction

Internal derangement is an abnormal relationship between the articular disc and the mandibular condyle. The most common cause is trauma. Various classifications have been given for internal derangement. Initial management is done conservatively and if the disease is progressed, surgery is the option. Various surgical methods and interpositional materials following discectomy have been given in the literature.

Materials and Methods

Over the past 15 years, we selected a group of 30 patients, Wilkes Class IV and V where conservative therapy had failed and were candidates for surgery. The patients had their disc repositioned, the damaged part of the disc was excised and disc was reinforced using the temporalis myofascial flap (TMF). In cases where the disc was non-salvageable, discectomy was done and TMF was placed between condyle and glenoid fossa, sutured with Prolene. The follow-up period was 3 years.

Results

Of the 30 patients, there were 9 male and 21 female. Range of mouth opening was 3.3-3.8 cm with improvements in 1 year. The jaw relations gradually improved and were restored after 3 weeks. Patients were totally pain free in 6 months.

Discussion

For the cases where surgery is the line of treatment, we strongly suggest disc repositioning and reinforcement with TMF as the flap is bulky, locally available and easy to harvest and causes no deformity at the donor site.

Predictive risk factors for persistent pain following total prosthetic temporomandibular joint replacement

The aim of this study was to determine the rate of persistent pain following total TMJ replacement and to identify potential predictive risk factors. A retrospective review of case notes treated by a single surgeon in a tertiary unit was performed. For each patient a number of variables were recorded including visual analogue pain scores (0 to 10) and opioid usage pre surgery and at 12 months or last follow up beyond 12 months. Persistent pain scores of 5 to 7 were regarded as moderate and 8 to 10 as severe. The mean pain score at last follow-up was significantly lower than preoperatively (2.1 vs. 6.3, p < 0.001) with a mean follow-up time of 40.1 months (range 12-44). 16.4% of the patients reported moderate to severe pain and 13.7% were still on regular opioids at the last follow-up. Therefore 15 patients (20.5%) suffered from chronic postoperative pain after TMJ replacement surgery. Patients reporting severe preoperative pain scores (p = 0.04), regular opioid use (p = 0.001) or multiple previous open TMJ surgeries (p = 0.03) were more likely to suffer from chronic persistent pain and these should be regarded as predictive risk factors. The identification of these factors allows for better risk stratification of patients, informed consent and the agreement of expected outcomes. Patients with true articular disease and a single failed surgery should be considered for early total TMJ replacement to minimise multifactorial persistent pain.

An Evaluation of Jaw Tracking Movements in Patients with Total Joint Replacements versus a Control Group

Background and Objectives: One form of treatment for degenerative temporomandibular joint diseases such as osteoarthritis, rheumatic arthritis, TMJ ankylosis, and condylar resorption is total joint replacement. The aim of this study was to examine the function of the temporomandibular joint after prosthetic joint replacement. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with unilateral or bilateral TMJ total joint replacements and 15 healthy controls were evaluated via a SICAT JMT+ device. This non-invasive system measures 3D position and linear movements in all degrees of freedom and allows undisturbed functional mandibular movements to provide a quantitative evaluation. In addition, a TMJ questionnaire consisting of the subjective symptoms was also obtained. To date, no similar studies have been cited in the literature. Results: Mandibular movements after prosthetic joint replacement were recorded during opening, closing, protrusion, and lateral excursive movements and were all significantly decreased compared to those of controls. In the treatment group, the maximum incisal opening was 33.46 ± 5.47 mm, left lateral movement was 1.91 ± 2.7 mm, right lateral movement was 1.74 ± 1.74 mm, and protrusive movement was 2.83 ± 2.05 mm. The p-value comparison study and control group indicated significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two groups. The study group stated a high level of satisfaction with the total joint replacement. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) TMJ replacement patients showed significantly limited jaw movements compared to the control group; (2) a small percentage of TMJ replacement patients still present low levels of pain but improved chewing ability and quality of life.

Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes Following Temporomandibular Joint Discectomy and Fat Graft

PURPOSE

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy is performed for patients with degenerative joint disease with an unsalvageable disc, but with a salvageable condylar head and glenoid fossa. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence and risk factors associated with poor postoperative outcomes following TMJ discectomy and abdominal fat grafting.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent TMJ discectomy. Included in this study were patients who had complete data sets with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Potential risk factors included demographics, preoperative findings (mouth opening, pain levels, previous TMJ surgery), operative findings (disc degeneration, state of TMJ components), and postoperative outcomes (pain levels, mouth opening). Failed outcomes were those who had return of pain postoperatively, no improvement in mouth opening following TMJ discectomy, and/or those who progressed to TMJ total joint replacement (TJR). Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression time to event analyses.

RESULTS

This study included 129 patients who had undergone 132 TMJ discectomies. Most patients were female (89.9%), with a mean age of 43.2 years, standard deviation 14.2. The success rate for discectomy was 75.2% and the conversion rate of TMJ discectomy to TJR was 11.7%. A total of 32 patients (24.8%) experienced return of pain. The median time to return of pain or second surgery was 94.4 months (95% CI = 88.3 to 101.8). No risk factors were statistically significant, although mouth opening improvement of less than 10% was associated with higher risk of poor outcome (P = .77).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that lower improvement in mouth opening at 1 year following surgery is likely to result in failure of the TMJ discectomy procedure although the result was not statistically significant. This outcome may ultimately necessitate a TJR.

Effectiveness of disk repositioning and suturing comparing open-joint versus arthroscopic techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present a systematic review of the effectiveness of discopexy in managing internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

STUDY DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE through PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and grey literature accessed through Google Scholar, Openthesis, and hand-searching from inception to July 2020. The search strategy yielded 363 potentially relevant studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 41 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There was an overall decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of 4.59 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-7.16; P < .001) during the follow-up time and an overall increase of 10 mm (95% CI, 6.93-13.01; P < .001) in mouth opening after TMJ surgeries with discopexy.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence showed an overall decrease in VAS pain score and an improvement in mouth opening after TMJ surgeries with discopexy. Changes in maximal interincisal opening were greater after arthroscopic disk repositioning compared to open-joint procedure.

Is Eminectomy Effective in the Management of Chronic Closed Lock?

Purpose

This study assesses the effectiveness of eminectomy in the management of chronic closed lock, refractory to conservative medical management in the largest multi-centred study of its kind in the UK, with a cohort of 167 patients. Temporomandibular mandibular joint disorder affects 30% of adults in the UK. Chronic closed lock is a well-documented sub-type.

Method

A retrospective study of patients with refractory closed lock was carried out, where conservative management had been implemented for a minimum of 6 months. Refractory patients were offered eminectomy at three separate centres over a period from 1995 to 2011. The primary variable was the inter-incisal distance (IID). Other variables included pain, clicking and nerve damage pre- and post-operatively.

Results

There were 167 patients across all three centres, 81% of which were female. The mean IID was 23 mm pre-operatively and 37 mm post-operatively. There was a statistically significant association with the primary predictor variable, yielding a p value of < 0.05. Clicking resolved completely post-operatively in 84 patients (58%). Pain subjectively improved in 56% cases.

Conclusion

Eminectomy is a safe and effective surgical procedure and has a role to play as a second-line surgical option in the management of closed lock after more conservative medical options have failed.

Clinical assessment of acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm©) as an option in the replacement of the temporomandibular joint disc: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

There is limited data available in the literature describing the utility of acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm©) in the replacement of the temporomandibular joint disc. Few reports of clinicians using implantable AlloDerm to replace the disc do exist, however, this has been described for reconstruction after surgical resection of the entire temporomandibular joint complex to treat pathology, as opposed to isolated articular disc disorders. Moreover, there is a lack of description in the literature regarding associated perioperative outcomes after such a procedure. We sought to assess the immediate perioperative outcomes in the form of a pilot study, to determine whether this technique warrants further investigation in the form of prospective clinical studies.

METHODS

The study team conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients who underwent temporomandibular joint discectomy and replacement with AlloDerm© at a single tertiary care center, from 2011 to 2016. Perioperative outcomes of interest including pain levels and range of motion were recorded and descriptive statistics were utilized for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

15 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 87% were females and 13% males. The mean age was 47.27±15.93 years. Preoperatively, 74% of the patients reported severe pain (VAS scores of 7-10); in contrast, 73% of the patients reported only mild pain (VAS scores of 1-3) during the postoperative visits, suggesting an overall reduction in pain intensity. Range of motion also improved from an average of 27.73±13.04mm, to an average of 38.60±6.08mm (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our preliminary data, patients with advanced TMJ articular disc disorders showed clinical improvement from discectomy and replacement with acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm©). Further longitudinal studies evaluating long-term outcomes need to be conducted to validate this technique, in the form of larger sample sizes with a control group, as well as radiographic assessment of long-term clinical outcomes.

Rearthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint: A retrospective study of 600 arthroscopies

PURPOSE

Arthroscopic surgery is an effective treatment for patients with temporomandibular disorders, releasing symptoms and restoring the mandibular function. In patients with poor arthroscopic outcomes, several options of treatment can be considered such as conservative nonsurgical therapy, open surgery, or a second arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our results after 619 arthroscopies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of 619 arthroscopies performed between 1996 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Outcome assessments were based on reductions in pain, measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), and improvement in maximal interincisal opening (MIO). The minimum follow-up period was 24 months.

RESULTS

The incidence of TMJ reoperation in the 371 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery was 5.9%, with a mean time between surgeries of 66.73 months. Significant improvement between presurgical and postsurgical pain and presurgical and postsurgical MIO at months 6 and 12 were evident. The mean of preoperative MIO was 30.84 mm, which increased to 35.92 mm 1-year postsurgery, these results being statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In most of the cases the result of a new arthroscopy is satisfactory. Rearthroscopy of the TMJ is a valid and effective method for patients with a first unsuccessful arthroscopy.

Management of the temporomandibular joint in inflammatory arthritis: Involvement of surgical procedures

Many conditions may affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), but its incidence in individual joint diseases is low. However, inflammatory arthropathies, particularly rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, appear to have a propensity for affecting the joint. Symptoms include pain, restriction in mouth opening, locking, and noises, which together can lead to significant impairment. Jaw rest, a soft diet, a bite splint, and medical therapy, including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and simple analgesia, are the bedrock of initial treatment and will improve most symptoms in most patients. Symptom deterioration does not necessarily follow disease progression, but when it does, TMJ arthroscopy and arthrocentesis can help modulate pain, increase mouth opening, and relieve locking. These minimally invasive procedures have few complications and can be repeated. Operations to repair or remove a damaged intra-articular disc or to refine joint anatomy are used in select cases. Total TMJ replacement is reserved for patients where joint collapse or fusion has occurred or in whom other treatments have failed to provide adequate symptomatic control. It yields excellent outcomes and is approved by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), UK. Knowledge of the assessment and treatment of the TMJ, which differs from other joints affected by inflammatory arthritis due to its unique anatomy and function, is not widespread outside of the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The aim of this article is to highlight the peculiarities of TMJ disease secondary to rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis and how to best manage these ailments, which should help guide when referral to a specialist TMJ surgeon is appropriate.

Current thinking about the management of dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint: a review

Increasingly the management of TMJ pathology is becoming a subspecialist interest. The number of patients having TMJ joint replacement had steadily increased over the last decade and there is now NICE guidance on this matter. Whilst the evidence of the management of TMJ disease is limited and there are few randomised controlled trials, the incidence of TMJ pathology has not changed and there is a requirement for guidance on the management. Whilst previously patients with TMJ pain were managed surgically, this is changing, and the vast bulk of initial management is non-surgical/medical. This paper will review the literature on TMD and provide guidance for management.

TMJ pain and cryoanalgesia

Temporomandibular (TMJ) joint pain is a complex issue involving several factors in a spectrum including myofascial pain, internal derangement and degenerative disease, all of which are reciprocally affected by psychological factors. Current assessment of TMD (temporomandibular disorder) can be assisted by standardised protocols, but often there is a combination of disease processes which each need to be addressed. Initial management should always be conservative with a preference for non-invasive measures which do no harm and have evidential support. Subsequent management of myofascial pain could involve tricyclic anti-depressants or botulinum injection into areas of muscle spasm. Joint related pain is diagnosed by relief of pain following intra-articular local analgesia. Where this is successful arthroscopy/arthrocentesis are successful in relieving the pain in up to 90% of cases. In addition arthroscopy is an accurate diagnostic tool. Where this fails, open surgery is less successful and ultimately joint replacement may be required. Where the latter are not indicated, but pain is relieved by LA, cryoanalgesia to the joint capsule may be beneficial.