Blood lead concentrations as a result of retained lead pellets in the craniomaxillofacial region in Benin City, Nigeria

Inflammatory low back pain with radiculopathy revealing epidural disintegration of a bullet complicated by lead poisoning

Inflammatory low back pain with radiculopathy is suggestive of cancer, infection or inflammatory diseases. We report a unique case of a 42-year-old patient with an acute inflammatory low back pain with bilateral radiculopathy associated with weight loss and abdominal pain, revealing the disintegration of a lead bullet along the epidural space and the S1 nerve root complicated by lead poisoning. Because of the high blood lead level of intoxication (>10 times over the usual lead levels) and the failure of repeated lead chelator cycles, a surgical treatment to remove bullet fragments was performed. It resulted in a significant decrease of pain and lead intoxication.

Retained bullets and lead toxicity: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Lead toxicity secondary to retained bullet(s) (RB) after a penetrating gunshot wound is a rare but likely underdiagnosed condition, given the substantial number of firearm injuries in the United States. There is currently no consensus on the indications for surveillance, chelation, or surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our review is to summarize the literature on systemic lead toxicity secondary to RBs to help guide clinicians in the management of these patients.

METHODOLOGY

The primary literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane, and CENTRAL using the following MESH terms: "chelation" and "lead poisoning" or "lead toxicity" or "lead" and "bullet" or "missile" or "gunshot", or "bullet".

RESULTS

The search identified 1,082 articles. After exclusions, a total of 142 articles were included in our final review, the majority of which were case reports. Several factors appear to increase the risk of developing lead toxicity including the location of the RB, the presence of a fracture or recent trauma, number of fragments, hypermetabolic states, and bullet retention duration. Particularly, RBs located within a body fluid compartment like an intra-articular space appear to be at a substantially higher risk of developing lead toxicity. Even though patients with lead toxicity from RBs will have similar symptoms to patients with lead toxicity from other sources, the diagnosis of lead poisoning may occur months or years after a gunshot wound. Symptomatic patients with high blood lead levels (BLLs) tended to improve with a combination of chelation and surgical removal of RBs.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest surveillance with serial BLLs should be performed. Patients with intra-articular RBs appear to be at increased risk of lead toxicity and if possible, early surgical removal of the RBs is warranted, especially given that signs of toxicity are vague, and patients may not have access to follow-up. Long-term chelation should not be used as a surgical alternative and management should be multidisciplinary.

Retained bullet fragments after nonfatal gunshot wounds: epidemiology and outcomes

BACKGROUND

With no consensus on the optimal management strategy for asymptomatic retained bullet fragments (RBF), the emerging data on RBF lead toxicity have become an increasingly important issue. There are, however, a paucity of data on the magnitude of this problem. The aim of this study was to address this by characterizing the incidence and distribution of RBF.

METHODS

A trauma registry was used to identify all patients sustaining a gunshot wound (GSW) from July 1, 2015, to June 31, 2016. After excluding deaths during the index admission, clinical demographics, injury characteristics, presence and location of RBF, management, and outcomes, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 344 patients were admitted for a GSW; of which 298 (86.6%) of these were nonfatal. Of these, 225 (75.5%) had an RBF. During the index admission, 23 (10.2%) had complete RBF removal, 35 (15.6%) had partial, and 167 (74.2%) had no removal. Overall, 202 (89.8%) patients with nonfatal GSW were discharged with an RBF. The primary indication for RBF removal was immediate intraoperative accessibility (n = 39, 67.2%). The most common location for an RBF was in the soft tissue (n = 132, 58.7%). Of the patients discharged with an RBF, mean age was 29.5 years (range, 6.1-62.1 years), 187 (92.6%) were me, with a mean Injury Severity Score of 8.6 (range, 1-75). One hundred sixteen (57.4%) received follow-up, and of these, 13 (11.2%) returned with an RBF-related complication [infection (n = 4), pain (n = 7), fracture nonunion (n = 1), and bone erosion (n = 1)], with a mean time to complication of 130.2 days (range, 11-528 days). Four (3.4%) required RBF removal with a mean time to removal of 146.0 days (range, 10-534 days).

CONCLUSION

Retained bullet fragments are very common after a nonfatal GSW. During the index admission, only a minority are removed. Only a fraction of these are removed during follow-up for complications. As lead toxicity data accumulates, further follow-up studies are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

Lead toxicity from retained bullet fragments: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Firearm injury remains a public health epidemic in the United States. A large proportion of individuals with gunshot wounds subsequently have retained bullet fragments (RBF). There are no standard medical guidelines regarding bullet removal and the full extent of the consequences of RBF remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is an association among RBF, elevated blood lead levels (BLL) and lead toxicity in survivors of firearm injury 16 years and older.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Sociological Abstracts electronic databases were searched for all randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies published in the English language between 1988 and 2018. Quality assessment and risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,012 articles after removal of duplicates. Twelve were included after full article review. Eleven studies supported an association between elevated BLL and RBF. Bony fractures were associated with increased risk of elevated BLL in three studies. A positive relationship between BLL and the number of RBF was also shown in three studies, with one study demonstrating 25.6% increase in BLL for every natural-log increase in RBF (1-228, p < 0.01). Meta-analysis demonstrated BLL significantly higher in individuals with RBF as compared to controls (5.47 μg/dL, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with bony fractures or multiple RBF, who are at higher risk of elevated BLL, should be monitored for BLL in intervals of 3 months within the first year of injury. For patients who return with BLL above 5 μg/dL, all efforts must be undertaken to remove fragments if there is no potential to worsen the injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, Meta-analysis, level III.