Outcomes of treatment for intracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle: recommendation for a new classification

Condyle head fracture management: A systematic review of outcomes

The management of Condylar Head fractures (CHFs) has historically been with closed treatments(CTR); however, contemporary studies suggest that Open Reduction and Internal Fixation(ORIF) may produce better clinical and radiographic results. Our primary aim was to review the literature on the clinical and radiological outcomes of open and closed management of CHFs. A systematic literature search was undertaken using EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed, using PRISMA guidelines, for all studies relating to outcomes following CHF. The inclusion criteria include 1) studies focused on CHF in adult patients that included at least 20 cases 2) published in English language. ROBINS-1 tool was used for risk assessment. Data extracted was analysed and compared using the relative risks. A total of 29 studies reporting on 1550 ORIF and 798 CTR were included. ORIF resulted in significantly less trismus (RR 9.5), chin deviation (RR 7.3), malocclusion (RR 6.5), TMJ clicking (RR 4.3) and pain(RR 12.6) than CTR. Due to the substantial heterogeneity of studies, firm conclusions are difficult but there does appear to be objective benefits in outcomes following ORIF than CTR. Satisfactory results may however be achieved with CTR. Further large studies using standardised outcome measurements will be required to help elucidate exactly which CHF are best served by ORIF.

A Comparative Analysis of Surgical and Conservative Management in Intra-Articular Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Background: Mandibular condylar fractures are among the most common fractures of the facial skeleton, and their surgical management remains a topic of considerable debate in maxillofacial trauma surgery. Numerous studies in the literature internationally have explored optimal treatment approaches, with a growing preference for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). While conservative treatment has traditionally been the standard for intra-articular fractures, recent research suggests that ORIF may also be appropriate for selected cases of these fractures. Methods: This study presents a 14-year review (2009–2023) of the authors’ experience in the surgical management of intra-articular condylar fractures. Data were collected on surgical techniques, early and late complications, clinical and radiological outcomes, and comparisons with conservative treatment. Results: The analysis included evaluations of both short-term and long-term outcomes following ORIF, identifying specific scenarios where ORIF demonstrated advantages over conservative management. Clinical and radiographic assessments provided valuable insights into patient recovery and functional outcomes, while complication rates were documented for both treatment methods. Conclusions: Findings indicate that ORIF can be a beneficial treatment option for intra-articular condylar fractures in select patient groups, offering improved outcomes in cases where conservative treatment may be insufficient. However, conservative management remains a valid approach when surgical risks exceed potential benefits. This study adds to the ongoing discussion, supporting a tailored approach that considers individual patient factors when choosing between ORIF and conservative treatment.

Does surgical treatment of mandibular condyle head (diacapitular) fractures provide better outcomes than closed treatment? - a systematic review and meta-analysis

The choices for managing a condylar head fracture (CHF) of the mandible are either open surgical or closed functional treatments (CFT) and the decision depends on various factors. The purpose of this systematic review was to ascertain from the available literature whether the open method or CFT yields better outcomes in managing CHF. We have systematically reviewed published articles according to the PRISMA statement. The search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and the Cochrane Library database for comparative studies about both open and closed treatments from inception until April 2023. The outcomes of interest were mouth opening (MO), protrusion, laterotrusion, postoperative pain, and malocclusion. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The review comprised of 326 cases, among which 177 were managed by open methods and 149 were treated by CFT. The incidence of postoperative malocclusion and pain were significantly less in the open group. MO was better in the open treatment group although this was not statistically significant. Protrusion and laterotrusion occurred slightly more in CFT, although these were also statistically not significant. Overall, meta-analysis favoured open methods of managing CHF. Although enough evidence exists for the use of open methods for selected condylar head fractures, CFT still demonstrated favourable outcomes in undisplaced fractures. The selection of a particular treatment method should be individualised on the basis of each particular case considering the risk/benefits. Further high quality randomised trials are needed to establish a therapeutic guideline.

Open Treatment with Ultrasound Activated Resorbable Pins Versus Closed Treatment of Adult Mandible Condylar Head Fractures

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with ultrasound activated resorbable pins (UARPs) is superior to closed treatment of condylar head (CH) fractures. The investigators hypothesized that fixation with UARPs is superior to closed treatment of CH fracture.

Methods

It was a prospective pilot study on CH fracture patients. Patients in closed group were managed conservatively with arch bar fixation and elastic guidance. Fixation in open group was done with UARPs. Assessment was done for primary objective of stability of fixation by UARPs and secondary objectives of functional outcome and complications.

Results

The study sample included 20 patients (10 in each group). 10 patients (11 joints) in closed group and 9 patients (10 joints) in open group were available for final follow-up. 5 joints showed re-dislocation of fractured segment, 1 joint showed slightly imperfect but adequate fixation and 4 joints showed adequate fixation in open group. In the closed group, displaced fragment was fused with mandible at displaced position in all the joints. All the joints showed resorption of medial condylar head at 3 months follow-up in open group. There was minimal resorption of condyle in closed group. Occlusion was deranged in 3 patients in open group and 1 patient in closed group. MIO, pain scores and lateral excursions were equal in both the groups.

Conclusion

The results of the present study rejected the hypothesis that fixation of CH with UARPs was superior than closed treatment. There was resorption of medial CH fragment in open group as compared to closed group.

The Treatment Perspective of Pediatric Condyle Fractures and Long-Term Outcomes

PURPOSE

In our study, the characteristics, treatment approach and long-term outcomes of condyle fractures treated in the pediatric plastic surgery and reconstruction unit in the last 10 years were evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study consisted of two retrospective and prospective sections with the participation of pediatric patients with condylar fractures who were treated in the Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery clinic of a university hospital in the last 10 years. In the retrospective section, data were obtained from the electronic patient records and patient files regarding the treatment applied, as well as the characteristics of the patient and condyle fractures. In the perspective section, patients were invited to the clinic and the effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for IBM 25 package program.

RESULTS

It was determined that 55.8% of the pediatric patients had accompanying facial fractures, and 72.4% had unilateral condyle fractures. It was determined that 59.5% of the pediatric patients underwent intermaxillary fixation (IMF). Physical complications were seen in 6.75% in the long term after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Falling from height and traffic accidents, which are the most important factors in the occurrence of condyle fractures, should be eliminated by increasing parental attention and awareness. Surgical treatment should be considered in the treatment of pediatric condyle fractures, especially if there are accompanying facial and mandible bone fractures.

Towards a consensus for classification of mandibular condyle fractures

The merits of surgical treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle versus non-surgical management remains highly controversial, despite a large volume of literature dedicated to this topic. One reason the controversy remains, is because most of the outcomes in the literature are not directly comparable. The disparate range of condylar fracture classifications used is one of the reasons that studies are not comparable. We sought to review classification systems for condylar fractures used in the recent scientific literature. Review of the literature from 2016 to 2019, looking for papers relating to fractures of the mandibular condyle. Papers identified were assessed for type of study, focus of study, classification system used. 88 studies were identified, including prospective and retrospective cohort studies, randomised and non-randomised prospective studies, randomised controlled trials and case series. More studies focussed on epidemiological factors than surgical access, fixation or outcomes. 31 used no classification system, whilst 17 used unique classification systems and 40 used previously referenced classification systems. Classification systems are used to help separate clinical problems into distinguishable groups, where there is a difference in management or outcome depending on the distinguishing features. There is currently a wide diversity of classification systems used for condyle fractures, and as a result, comparisons of surgical access, fixation and outcomes are difficult to make. Having a single classification system across the published literature would allow easier comparison and the classification proposed by the AO group is recommended for future use.

Investigating the correlation between bone density and fracture frequency in the mandibular condyle with micro-computed tomography

Fractures of the mandibular condyle are common and include diacapitular fractures that affect the condylar head. The medial part of the condylar head is least commonly fractured, possibly due to decreased propensity for lines of force to run in the region. Micro-computed tomography (X-ray microtomography) of five temporomandibular joint specimens was conducted to explore whether trabecular bone structure correlates positively with fracture prevalence, which could reflect adaptation in response to lower exposure to physiological loads throughout life. Models of trabecular bone, and graphic representation of bone density indicated least dense bone medially, but a statistically significant ANOVA result was not obtained. Further study is required to verify whether a relationship between bone microstructure and fracture frequency exists, and whether or not this is the product of association between the directions of physiological and traumatic forces.

A Retrospective Study of Condylar Fracture Management in a Tertiary Care Hospital-A 10-Year Experience

Introduction

Since the advent of rigid fixation, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of condylar fractures from closed treatment options to open reduction and rigid internal fixation.

Materials and Method

Sixty-eight cases of condylar fractures reporting to Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed in terms of age, sex, type of fracture, position of the mandibular third molar and the treatment rendered.

Results

The majority of the patients were males (60). There was an involvement of the right side in 34, left in 21 and bilateral involvement in 13 cases. Forty-three of the fractures were subcondylar, and 25 were intracapsular. Significantly in most cases, the mandibular third molar was either fully erupted (42) or missing (12). Sixty-one cases were subjected to surgical management including 49 cases of rigid internal fixation, and 12 of the intracapsular fractures had the condylar stump/segment removed. Only seven cases were not treated surgically. Most of the cases (44) were in the age group of 21-40, 12 were in the age group of 41-60, 9 were in the age group of 1-20, and 3 patients were above 60.

Conclusion

Condylar fractures more often do not require surgical intervention, and their incidence is more likely to occur when the third molar is either fully erupted or missing.

Prognosis of diacapitular condylar fractures: a multivariate analysis

The choice of treatment for diacapitular condylar fractures remains in dispute among oral and maxillofacial surgeons. A multivariate retrospective study was designed to compare the prognosis after conservative treatment and surgery, and to explore further indications for management. From 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2017, 169 patients with diacapitular condylar fractures were included. Relevant preoperative data were collected, and the prognoses assessed. Three ordinal logistic regression models were constructed to study the factors that affected prognosis, and these showed that all patients treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) tended to have a better prognosis than those treated with conservative treatment (adult: odds ratio (OR)=6.166, p=0.000, and children: OR=12.195, p=0.029). Adult patients with lateral dislocation of the stump of the ramus out of the glenoid fossa tended to have the highest risk of a poor prognosis, followed by those with anteromedial displacement of the disc and loss of the height of the ramus of over 5mm. Only the type of treatment affected the prognosis for children. In conclusion, these findings suggest that ORIF is the preferred method of treatment for patients with diacapitular condylar fractures. The absolute indications for ORIF in adult patients with diacapitular condylar fractures include lateral dislocation of the stump of the ramus out of the glenoid fossa, anteromedial displacement of the disc, and loss of height of the ramus of over 5mm. There are no absolute indications for ORIF in children.

Articular soft tissue injuries associated with mandibular condyle fractures and the effects on oral function

The majority of studies debating the optimization of treatment for condylar mandibular fractures focus on the bony aspect first. However, fractures of the mandibular condyle may go together with soft tissue injury of the temporomandibular joint. An electronic literature search for this topic was undertaken. Assessment of quality was carried out using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Sixteen articles were included in this review. The reviewed literature showed that intracapsular fractures and dislocated condylar fractures result in more severe injuries. Serious injury to the disc and capsule of the temporomandibular joint is a contributing factor towards development of complications after closed treatment. The results of this review give an overview of the published studies focusing on articular soft tissue injuries caused by condylar mandibular fractures. Additionally, an overview of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) settings used to detect these injuries is provided. Until now, the relation between soft tissue injuries and type of condylar trauma and their influence on clinical outcome has been insufficiently investigated. Before considering reduction of soft tissues next to reduction of the fracture, more research is needed into the impact of soft tissue injuries on oral functioning, in which a uniform classification is used.