Mitchell-Hoole-Kanatas (MHK) questionnaire: the first to measure patient-reported outcomes relating to problems with intimacy after diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer

The Evaluation of Training Oral and Maxillofacial Trainees in Head and Neck Cancer Doctor-Patient Communication Using the Patient Concerns Inventory

Head and neck cancer has a significant impact on a patient's health related quality of life (HRQOL). The head and neck specific Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI-HN) has been utilised to enhance doctor-patient dialogue in routine consultations. To date there has been no formal training for oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) surgical trainees in the use of the PCI-HN in consultations. The aim of the study was to evaluate training for OMFS surgical trainees in the use of the PCI-HN, using simulated follow-up HNC consultations, in order to improve doctor-patient communication skills.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten oral and maxillofacial surgical trainees completed actor simulated HNC consultations before and after training. A study-specific mark scheme was developed based on the ComOn-Coaching rating scales and used to score the doctor-patient interaction. A group debrief afterwards explored the trainee's experiences of the training and consultations.

RESULTS

All trainees showed an improvement in doctor-patient communication scores following their training. Overall, the six participants who were Specialty registrars, year 3 (ST3) or above, scored higher, than the four Specialty registrars, year 1-2 (ST1-2). The scores were higher if fewer PCI-HN items were discussed (3-4). The most frequently avoided PCI-HN items were intimacy and relationships. The trainees considered that their training was useful for organising their consultations and for providing holistic care.

CONCLUSION

Although training improved surgeon-patient communication, further evaluation is required with a larger number of trainees and actual consultations in clinic.

Do radiation oncologists talk about sexual health and dysfunction with their cancer patients? Results of the igls-vienna-sexmed-survey

Background and purpose

The aim of this survey was to invite radiation oncologists to self-assess whether sexual health care and sexual dysfunction are an issue in daily routine.

Materials and Methods

At the annual congress of the Austrian Society of Radiation Oncology in 2017 doctors were asked about their care for sexual health in cancer patients by using questionnaires. No exclusion criteria were employed. Forty-one questionnaires were answered and statistically analysed so 44.5% of doctors participated.

Results

Only 4.9% of the participants self-assessed to routinely explore sexual health issues in 61-80% of their patients. Thirty-one point seven percent of the doctors suspected sexual problems in about half of their patients but did not raise the issue. The most common reason for not raising sexual issues by the patients was assumed by the doctors "other problems are more important" (73.2%), followed by "lack of time" (36.6%). Participants were also asked about additional medical qualifications: none of the physicians had training in sexual medicine.

Conclusion

The main reason for not talking about sexual problems was the impression of the participating doctors that other problems were more important for the patients. Another reason for not bringing up the topic of sexual issues by the patients was assumed by the doctors: lack of time. As doctor shortage is a problem in the observed country other kind of networks and counselling possibilities should be evaluated. An interesting finding was that survey participants show a higher awareness for male sexual problems than for female issues.