Mitchell-Hoole-Kanatas (MHK) questionnaire: the first to measure patient-reported outcomes relating to problems with intimacy after diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer

Sexual Health, sexuality and sexual intimacy in patients with head and neck cancer - A narrative review

Sexuality and sexual intimacy are important aspects of cancer survivorship. In head and neck cancer (HNC), concerns around sexual health, sexuality and sexual intimacy are infrequently raised or addressed in standard HNC consultations, either before embarking on treatment or during survivorship. The changing demographic of HNC patients, largely due to the increasing proportion of patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPVOPSCC), has driven renewed interest in some specific survivorship issues, including sexual behaviours and lifestyles, which may account for both the primary mode of HPV transmission and the younger and less comorbid population affected by this disease. While HNC survivors may have many complex needs in the short and longer term, some patients may prioritise preserving sexual function above other more HNC-specific issues, such as swallowing and xerostomia. Beyond HPVOPSCC, there is evidence to suggest that impairment of sexual health is a pervasive survivorship issue across all HNC cancer types, and this narrative review article highlights publications reporting quantitative assessments of sexual health outcomes in HNC patients. There are also limited studies evaluating whether current sexual health models of care are adequate for HNC patients or whether new or adapted models are needed. Future research will also need to define the impact of our treatments on the sexuality and sexual intimacy concerns of specific HNC cohorts with more granularity to enhance pre- and post-treatment counselling.

The Effects of Head and Neck Cancer on Relationship Intimacy in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

This systematic literature review aimed to explore the effects of head and neck cancer (HNC) on relationship intimacy in adults and identify the current support available to patients with HNC and their partners in relation to relationship intimacy.

METHODS

Seven databases (CINAHL, Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, SocINDEX, PsycARTICLES, Psychology, and Behavioural Science Collection) were searched using grouped terms "head and neck cancer and intimacy" and "head and neck cancer and support." Studies written in English to assess adult patients with HNC and its effects on relationship intimacy and studies assessing the use of intimacy-specific support tools/methods were included. The review protocol was registered in June 2022 with PROSPERO ID: CRD42022329614.

RESULTS

Thirty publications were included within the review. Six topics emerged: relationships, communication, sexual interest, barriers, couples-based communication intervention strategies, and assessment tools. While there were positive dyadic changes observed, many patients reported negative experiences relating to changes in relationship roles, sexual issues, and poor communication with partners and health care professionals that affected intimacy. There were 5 interventions identified; of those, the results varied, with some improvements noted in psychological well-being but not necessarily sexual interest and enjoyment.

CONCLUSIONS

HNC profoundly affects relationship intimacy. However, both patients and health care professionals find it challenging to discuss these issues, often leaving it an unmet need. Appropriate training and development for health care professionals that facilitate communication between clinician and patient are necessary to support conversations on intimacy needs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

There exists a need for patients to receive support in relation to intimacy following diagnosis and treatment, and the evidence suggests that this may be more effective post-treatment and from health care professionals who are appropriately trained. Couples' communication interventions may prove useful, but further research is required on the efficacy of combining both psychological and sexual support together.

The Evaluation of Training Oral and Maxillofacial Trainees in Head and Neck Cancer Doctor-Patient Communication Using the Patient Concerns Inventory

Head and neck cancer has a significant impact on a patient's health related quality of life (HRQOL). The head and neck specific Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI-HN) has been utilised to enhance doctor-patient dialogue in routine consultations. To date there has been no formal training for oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) surgical trainees in the use of the PCI-HN in consultations. The aim of the study was to evaluate training for OMFS surgical trainees in the use of the PCI-HN, using simulated follow-up HNC consultations, in order to improve doctor-patient communication skills.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten oral and maxillofacial surgical trainees completed actor simulated HNC consultations before and after training. A study-specific mark scheme was developed based on the ComOn-Coaching rating scales and used to score the doctor-patient interaction. A group debrief afterwards explored the trainee's experiences of the training and consultations.

RESULTS

All trainees showed an improvement in doctor-patient communication scores following their training. Overall, the six participants who were Specialty registrars, year 3 (ST3) or above, scored higher, than the four Specialty registrars, year 1-2 (ST1-2). The scores were higher if fewer PCI-HN items were discussed (3-4). The most frequently avoided PCI-HN items were intimacy and relationships. The trainees considered that their training was useful for organising their consultations and for providing holistic care.

CONCLUSION

Although training improved surgeon-patient communication, further evaluation is required with a larger number of trainees and actual consultations in clinic.

Do radiation oncologists talk about sexual health and dysfunction with their cancer patients? Results of the igls-vienna-sexmed-survey

Background and purpose

The aim of this survey was to invite radiation oncologists to self-assess whether sexual health care and sexual dysfunction are an issue in daily routine.

Materials and Methods

At the annual congress of the Austrian Society of Radiation Oncology in 2017 doctors were asked about their care for sexual health in cancer patients by using questionnaires. No exclusion criteria were employed. Forty-one questionnaires were answered and statistically analysed so 44.5% of doctors participated.

Results

Only 4.9% of the participants self-assessed to routinely explore sexual health issues in 61-80% of their patients. Thirty-one point seven percent of the doctors suspected sexual problems in about half of their patients but did not raise the issue. The most common reason for not raising sexual issues by the patients was assumed by the doctors "other problems are more important" (73.2%), followed by "lack of time" (36.6%). Participants were also asked about additional medical qualifications: none of the physicians had training in sexual medicine.

Conclusion

The main reason for not talking about sexual problems was the impression of the participating doctors that other problems were more important for the patients. Another reason for not bringing up the topic of sexual issues by the patients was assumed by the doctors: lack of time. As doctor shortage is a problem in the observed country other kind of networks and counselling possibilities should be evaluated. An interesting finding was that survey participants show a higher awareness for male sexual problems than for female issues.