A comparison of cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted 2-and 3-dimensional planning techniques in orthognathic surgery

Health-related quality of life, jaw function and sleep-disordered breathing among patients with dentofacial deformity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with dentofacial deformity (DFD) requiring orthognathic treatment have poor aesthetics, jaw function and psychological well-being, which potentially affect the quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the health-related general, oral and orthognathic quality of life, jaw function and sleep-disordered breathing at different stages of orthognathic surgical treatment.

METHODS

A total of 120 consecutive patients with DFD were recruited and grouped as pre-orthodontic treatment (group 1), pre-surgery (group 2), 4 months post-surgery (group 3), 24 months post-surgery (group 4) and in addition 30 controls without DFD (group 0). Outcomes were assessed using general health Short Form Survey (SF-36), Oral Health Impact (OHIP-14), Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), STOP-Bang and Jaw Function Limitation Scale (JFLS) questionnaires. In addition, presence or absence of pain was recorded. Data were tested with analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, Tukey post hoc test and structural equation modelling (SEM).

RESULTS

Results revealed SF-36 (p = .814) and STOP-Bang (p = .143) total scores did not differ between control and treatment groups. In contrast, OHIP-14, OQLQ and JFLS total scores differed between groups (p = .001). Higher scores were observed in groups 1 (p = .001), 2 (p = .001) and 3 (p = .041) compared to group 0, indicating poor oral health in patients with DFD. Importantly, in group 4, oral health-related quality of life was better, and OHIP-14 (p = .936) and JFLS (p = .572) scores did not differ from controls. OQLQ scores of group 4 were significantly lower than group 1 (p = .001) but higher than group 0 (p = .013). SEM results revealed a significant negative associations of pain with JFLS and OQLQ; OHIP-14 with OQLQ; OHIP-14 with SF-36; and finally STOP-Bang with SF-36. Positive associations were observed between JFLS and OHIP-14; OHIP-14 and OQLQ.

CONCLUSION

Oral health-related quality of life and jaw function appears to be improved 24 months after orthognathic surgery. Pain and limitation in jaw function had a negative association with health-related quality of life.

Redefining precision and efficiency in orthognathic surgery through virtual surgical planning and 3D printing: a narrative review

Orthognathic surgery, essential for addressing jaw and facial skeletal irregularities, has historically relied on traditional surgical planning (TSP) involving a series of time-consuming steps including two-dimensional radiographs. The advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D printing technologies has revolutionized this field, bringing unprecedented precision and customization to surgical processes. VSP facilitates 3D visualization of the surgical site, allowing for real-time adjustments and improving preoperative stress for patients by reducing planning time. 3D printing dovetails with VSP, offering the creation of anatomical models and surgical guides, enhancing the predictability of surgical outcomes despite higher initial setup and material costs. The integration of VSP and 3D printing promises innovative and effective solutions in orthognathic surgery, surpassing the limitations of traditional methods. Patient-reported outcomes show a positive post-surgery impact on the quality of life, underlining the significant role of these technologies in enhancing self-esteem and reducing anxiety. Economic analyses depict a promising long-term fiscal advantage with these modern technologies, notwithstanding the higher initial costs. The review emphasizes the need for large-scale randomized controlled trials to address existing research gaps and calls for a deeper exploration into the long-term impacts and ethical considerations of these technologies. In conclusion, while standing on the cusp of a technological renaissance in orthognathic surgery, it is incumbent upon the medical fraternity to foster a collaborative approach, balancing innovation with scrutiny to enhance patient care. The narrative review encourages the leveraging of VSP and 3D printing technologies for more efficient and patient-centric orthognathic surgery, urging the community to navigate uncharted territories in pursuit of precision and efficiency in the surgical landscape.

Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Planning using Three-dimensional Virtual Techniques compared with Conventional Two-dimensional Techniques: a Systematic Review

Objectives

The objective was to assess the accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning using three-dimensional virtual planning compared with conventional two-dimensional planning.

Material and Methods

MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library search combined with hand-search of relevant journals was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English through August 2^nd, 2022. Primary outcomes included postsurgical accuracy of hard and soft tissue. Secondary outcomes included treatment planning time, intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, financial expenses, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Quality and risk-of-bias assessment were evaluated by Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE system.

Results

Seven RCTs characterised by low, high, and unclear risk of bias fulfilled inclusion criteria. Included studies disclosed conflicting results regarding accuracy of hard and soft tissue as well as treatment planning time. The intraoperative time was shortened, and financial expenses were increased with three-dimensional virtual surgical planning (TVSP), while no planning-related complications were revealed. Comparable improvement in PROMs were reported with TVSP and two-dimensional planning.

Conclusions

Future orthognathic surgical planning will indisputable be performed by three-dimensional virtual planning. The financial expenses, treatment planning time, and intraoperative time will therefore probably decrease due to further development of three-dimensional virtual planning techniques. The hard and soft tissue accuracy between planned position and achieved surgical outcome seems to be improved by three-dimensional virtual planning compared with two-dimensional planning, although results are inconsistent. Further development of three-dimensional virtual planning involving cutting guides and patient-specific osteosynthesis plates are therefore needed to improve the accuracy of orthognathic surgical planning.

The Use of Surgical Splints in Orthognathic Surgery: A Bibliometric Study

Introduction  Orthognathic surgeries require the use of surgical splints (SS) to stabilize the occlusion and the segments fixed with plates and screws. Technological advances in the field of computing and the possibility of generating three-dimensional (3D) images have brought different possibilities for making SS, which has generated greater predictability and customization of surgical plans. The bibliometric study can have a qualitative character through the scope of articles in a certain area of knowledge. It is a selection process that can track a topic or scientific production.

Methods  The present study aimed to carry out a bibliometric literature review, in order to assess the evolution of the use of SS and the different planning protocols in orthognathic surgery. The Scopus database was used, with the terms “splint” and “orthognathic surgery.”

Results  A total of 331 articles were found. These were exported to Rayyan for application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria and selection of articles. A total of 76 references were selected and exported to the VOSviewer application for the analysis of bibliometric data.

Conclusions  Orthognathic surgery was initially not associated with any computerized technological resource; however, it underwent updates between the years 2010 to 2012. These advances allowed surgical planning to become faster, cheaper, and more accurate.

Outcome of full digital workflow for orthognathic surgery planning in the treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Studies have reported the advantages of digital imaging-assisted orthognathic surgery planning, but there is scarce information about a full digital planning modality. This study evaluated the 3D cephalometric-based and patient-reported outcomes of a full digital workflow for orthognathic surgery planning in the treatment of asymmetric maxillomandibular disharmony.

METHODS

A postoperative 3D image dataset of 30 Taiwanese Chinese patients with asymmetric skeletal Class III deformities who underwent full digital planning for two-jaw surgery were retrieved from the authors' database. The 3D cephalometric data (dental, skeletal, and soft tissue evaluations) were compared to the ethnicity-matched 3D cephalometric normative values. Patient-reported outcome measure tools regarding postoperative overall appearance and satisfaction with facial areas (ranging from 0 to 100 and 0 to 10, respectively) were administered. The number of needed or requested revisionary surgery was collected.

RESULTS

No difference (all p > 0.05) was observed between the orthognathic-surgery-treated patients and the normative value for most of the tested 3D cephalometric parameters, with the exception (p < 0.05) of three mandible and occlusal-plane-related parameters. Both patient-reported outcome measure tools showed that patients' satisfaction with their postoperative appearance was high for overall face (89.7 ± 4.5) and specific facial regions (nose, 7.1 ± 1.3; lip, 8.3 ± 1.6; upper gum, 8.5 ± 1.2; cheek, 8.8 ± 1.1; chin, 9.2 ± 1.2; and teeth, 9.3 ± 0.8), with no need for revisionary surgery.

CONCLUSION

The patients treated with a full 3D digital planning-assisted two-jaw surgery had a similar 3D dental relation, facial convexity, and symmetry compared to healthy ethnicity-matched individuals, and they reported higher satisfaction levels with their postoperative facial appearance results.

Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Hybrid Versus Full Digital Planning Models

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) computer-aided planning has truly revolutionized orthognathic surgery (OGS) treatment, but no study has compared the traditional hybrid and full 3D digital planning models. This study compared these virtual planning models in the treatment of asymmetric maxillomandibular disharmony.

METHODS

Young adult patients with an asymmetric skeletal class III deformity who underwent 3D computer-aided 2-jaw OGS using hybrid (alginate dental impression, 2D cephalometric tracings, manual-guided stone model surgery, occlusion setup, and splint fabrication; n = 30) or full digital (laser-scanned dentition, 3D cephalometric tracings, virtual-based occlusion setup and surgery, and computer-generated surgical splint; n = 30) planning models were consecutively recruited. Preoperative and postoperative 3D cephalometric analyses (dental relation, skeletal assessments based on sagittal and frontal views, and soft tissue evaluations) were adopted for intragroup and intergroup comparisons. Postoperative patient-perceived satisfaction with facial appearance was also recorded.

RESULTS

Both hybrid and full digital planning groups had significant (all P < 0.05) improvements after surgery with respect to facial convexity, incisor overjet, and frontal symmetry parameters. The full 3D digital planning-based OGS treatment had similar (all P > 0.05) 3D cephalometric-derived outcomes (preoperative, postoperative, and treatment-induced change data) and patient-perceived outcomes compared with the traditional hybrid 3D planning method.

CONCLUSIONS

For the decision-making process in selecting the planning model, multidisciplinary teams could consider additional parameters such as patient comfort, storage needs, convenience for data reuse, overall planning time, availability, and costs.

Comparison of feasibility, time consumption and costs of three virtual planning systems for surgical correction of midfacial deficiency

Background

Today virtual surgical planning (VSP) is a standard method in maxillofacial corrective surgery and is the key to reach satisfactory esthetic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate usability of three established virtual surgical planning software applications by comparing feasibility, time consumption, and costs in a standardized workflow for a modified intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy (IQLFIIO).

Results

A cross-sectional study was performed based on retrospective and re-planned data of patients with midfacial deficiency treated by modified IQLFIIO, using three software applications: IPS Case Designer ®, Dolphin Imaging ®, and ProPlan CMF ®. Feasibility: All evaluated steps of the VSP procedure could be successfully performed in all three evaluated applications. In all software packages, it was possible to design the surgical splints with CAD/CAM technology. Working time: The mean value of time needed was IPS Case Designer ®, 36.5 min; Dolphin Imaging ®, 33.6 min; ProPlan CMF ®, 45.5 min. We found statistical significant difference between ProPlan CMF ® and Dolphin Imaging ® (p value, 0.02). Costs: Asset costs for acquiring the software, license fee, license possibilities, paying for support services, and service contracts were evaluated and are found in similar ranges.

Conclusion

All three tested software applications are usable for virtual planning of an IQLFIIO and splint production by CAD/CAM technology. Successful movement of bone segments and overlaying soft tissues proved feasibility. Time consumption and costs were found in similar ranges.

Review of papers published in The British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and The Journal of Orthodontics regarding three-dimensional computerised planning in orthognathic surgery: 2015 - 2019

This review paper summarises articles regarding orthognathic surgical planning and computerised technology, which were published in two leading national journals in both oral and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics. This article aims to keep readers up to date with the literature published in this rapidly progressing field.

A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Based on Randomized Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

To explore the advantages of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and traditional surgical planning (TSP) to determine whether the current VSP technique is superior to the TSP technique for orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

An electronic search was carried out in the CENTRAL, PubMed, and Embase databases to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the VSP and TSP techniques regarding their surgical accuracy for hard tissue, prediction precision for soft tissue, required time for planning and surgery, cost and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Eight articles from 5 RCTs, involving 199 patients, were identified. The findings showed that the VSP and TSP techniques were similar in surgical accuracy for hard tissue in the sagittal plane, although the VSP technique was significantly more accurate in certain reference areas, especially in the anterior area of the maxilla. Both the VSP and TSP techniques had significantly better surgical accuracy for the maxilla than for the mandible. The VSP technique showed clinically significantly greater precision for soft tissue prediction in the sagittal plane. Patients who were treated via the VSP technique presented a more symmetrical frontal view, regardless of whether hard or soft tissue was involved. The VSP technique required more time for software planning, but it showed an advantage in time savings when considering the entire preoperative process. Accompanied by the use of an accurate computer-aided splint, the VSP technique could effectively reduce the operative time. Apart from the initial financial investment of software and hardware, the total cost of the VSP technique was similar to that of the TSP technique. Patients who were treated via the VSP or TSP technique showed similar improvements in quality-of-life.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the VSP technique has become a good alternative to the TSP technique for orthognathic surgery, especially regarding frontal-esthetic considerations. Studies reporting indicators with good representativeness and sensitivity using an identical comparative method are recommended.

Comparison of cost-effectiveness and benefits of surgery-first versus orthodontics-first orthognathic correction of skeletal class III malocclusion

The aim of this study was to compare the costs and benefits of surgery-first (SF) and orthodontics-first (OF) approaches in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. This retrospective study recruited 54 patients who received combined orthognathic-orthodontic treatment via SF or OF approach. Data collected included orthodontic time, operating time, hospital stay, and detailed expenditures. Effectiveness was defined as quality of life, assessed by Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ-22) before and 1 year after treatment. Cost-effectiveness was measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental time-effectiveness ratio (ITER). The duration of SF was shorter than that of OF, due to a reduced orthodontic time (P=0.003). The operating time was longer with SF than with OF (P=0.015). There was no significant difference in hospital stay (P=0.868), cost of hospitalization (P=0.924) or orthodontics (P=0.171), or OQLQ score (P=0.41) between the two approaches. Cost-effectiveness analyses revealed a reduction in cost of US$ 6.43/OQLQ point and reduction in time of 8.60 months/OQLQ point gained by SF versus OF. The study findings revealed that the total treatment time was significantly shorter with SF than with OF, although the two approaches did not differ significantly in terms of total cost (P=0.979). Further studies on the cost-effectiveness of the two approaches in different healthcare systems across diverse countries are warranted.

Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery

Computer-assisted 3D planning has overcome the limitations of conventional 2D planning-guided orthognathic surgery (OGS), but difference for facial contour asymmetry outcome has not been verified to date. This comparative study assessed the facial contour asymmetry outcome of consecutive patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent 2D planning (n = 37)- or 3D simulation (n = 38)-guided OGS treatment for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and skeletal Class III malocclusion between 2010 and 2018. Normal age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched individuals (n = 60) were enrolled for comparative analyses. 2D (n = 60, with 30 images for each group) and 3D (n = 43, with 18 and 25 images for 2D planning and 3D simulation groups, respectively) photogrammetric-based facial contour asymmetry-related measurements were collected from patients and normal individuals. The facial asymmetry was further verified by using subjective perception of a panel composed of 6 blinded raters. On average, the facial contour asymmetry was significantly (all p < 0.05) reduced after 3D virtual surgery planning for all tested parameters, with no significant differences between post-OGS 3D simulation-related values and normal individuals. No significant differences were observed for pre- and post-OGS values in conventional 2D planning-based treatment, with significant (all p < 0.05) differences for all normal individuals-related comparisons. This study suggests that 3D planning presents superior facial contour asymmetry outcome than 2D planning.