Evaluation of alloplastic mandibular reconstruction combined with a radial forearm flap compared with a vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap as the first approach to two-stage rehabilitation in advanced oral cancer

Influence of microvascular mandibular bony reconstruction on the posterior airway space: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The posterior airway space (PAS) is a common site of passive obstructions with high morbidity. Surgical changes to the craniomandibular system may affect the PAS. Data regarding the effects of mandibular reconstruction using vascularized bone flaps on PAS are insufficient. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate changes in PAS after mandibular reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre- and post-reconstructive computed tomography scans of 40 patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy and mandibular reconstruction with deep circumflex iliac artery or fibula flaps were analyzed. Absolute differences in PAS geometry and relative trends of PAS volume changes were compared within the study population and between subgroups formed according to the extent of resection, timing and type of reconstruction, and presence of pre-reconstructive radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Irradiated patients were characterized by an increase in PAS volume after reconstruction. Absolute differences in total PAS volume after reconstruction were significantly different (p = 0.024) compared to non-irradiated patients. Reconstruction of central mandible segments resulted in decrease of the cross-sectional PAS areas. Absolute differences in middle cross-sectional PAS area after reconstruction were significantly different (p = 0.039) compared to non-central reconstructions. Patients who received radiotherapy were less likely to show a total PAS volume reduction after reconstruction (OR: 0.147; p = 0.007), with values adjusted for gender, age, body mass index, timing and type of reconstruction, and transplant length.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular reconstruction causes changes in PAS geometry. Specifically, reconstructions of central mandibular segments can lead to a reduction in the cross-sectional areas of PAS, and mandibular reconstructions in irradiated sites may cause an increase in PAS volume.

Mandibular reconstruction in head and neck cancer: which is the gold standard?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review to compare the outcomes of the different surgical options for mandibular reconstruction in head and neck cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

93 articles were selected. Four groups were identified: titanium plate without flaps, titanium plate covered by soft tissue flap, bone tissue flaps and double flaps. We compared patients' characteristics, site of mandibulectomy, type of reconstruction and complications.

RESULTS

4697 patients were reported. The groups were not homogeneous regarding the type of defect and the treatment history. A significant difference in terms of post-operative complications was found between group 1 and group 2 (p < 0.00001), and between group 2 and group 3 (p < 0.00001). Total complications rate for group 4 was significantly higher when compared to group 3 (p < 0.00001), but no significant difference was found with group 2.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that mandibular reconstruction using a microvascular bone flap is the best surgical option in patients without significant comorbidities.

Evaluation of a novel osteosynthesis plate system for mandibular defects

Continuity defects of the jaw can be reconstructed with titanium plates or microvascular bone flaps; osteosynthesis plates are necessary for both. In this study we performed a retrospective review of patients treated with Medartis MODUS® Mandible Trauma/Reco 2.0-2.5, TriLock bridging plates, mandibulectomy and soft tissue free flap or reconstruction with a bony free flap and TriLock mandibular plates from the same system from January 2015 to August 2019. The variables recorded were sex, age, diagnosis, radiotherapy, date of implantation, date of explantation or death of patient, size of mandibular defect, Jewer classification of defect, number of screws used, segments of bony reconstruction, screws per segment, plate exposure, plate breakage, and pseudarthrosis. The bridging plate group consisted of 41 patients, while the mandibular plate group consisted of 24 patients. The percentage of plate exposure was 17.07% for the bridging plate group and 4.17% for the mandibular plate group. Plate breakage was 0 in both groups. Pseudarthrosis was 4.17% in the mandibular plate group. In the bridging plate group, an anterolateral thigh flap covered all exposures. Of 7 plate exposures, 4 were found in a C defect. The complication rate of the investigated plates was lower than the complication rates of other plate systems.