Quantification of the inaccuracy of conventional articulator model surgery in Le Fort 1 osteotomy: evaluation of 30 patients controlled by the Orthopilot® navigation system

Evaluation of the accuracy of virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: Systematic review

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in bone by comparing the mean linear and angular measurements of the surgical plan with the actual surgical result. Electronic databases, MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, grey literature, and the American clinical trials registry (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), were accessed as search engines. The studies consisted of publications on the assessment of accuracy in virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery between 2010 and 2020. After application of the eligibility criteria, 26 articles were included, and their quality was evaluated using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool and Cohen's kappa statistic in the MedCalc program (MedCalc Software Ltd). Evidence obtained by comparing the planning and surgical results, both in the maxilla and mandible, showed that there is great accuracy in virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.

Improvement in accuracy of maxillary repositioning of Le Fort I osteotomy with Orthopilot™ Navigation System: evaluation of 30 patients

Traditional model surgery with facebow transfer is not very accurate. We aimed to demonstrate that the Orthopilot™ Navigation System improves the accuracy of maxillary repositioning during Le Fort I osteotomy. Thirty patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy alone or associated to sagittal split osteotomy. The maxilla positioning was done in two phases. First, the maxilla was positioned with the traditional occlusal splint, the position ("without Orthopilot™") was recorded by the Orthopilot™. In the second phase, the Orthopilot™ was used to improve positioning; and the final position ("with Orthopilot™") was recorded, after osteosynthesis. Positioning data were compared with planned data. Positioning data with and without the Orthopilot™ were also compared. Accuracy was classified in distinct classes with three major criteria (conformity, non-conformity, failure) according to the discrepancies. Conformity rate was significantly greater with the Orthopilot™ (2 without the Orthopilot™ compared with 8 with the Orthopilot™; p=0.01). The failure rate was significantly lower with the Orthopilot™ (18 without Orthopilot™ compared with 7 with the Orthopilot™; p=0.002). Dispersions of discrepancies were usually lower in all directions with the Orthopilot™. Navigation reduced the risk of discrepancy without cancelling it, especially when large movements are planned. The Orthopilot™ therefore improved the accuracy of traditional occlusal splint during Le Fort I osteotomy.