Association between MAFB rs17820943 and rs6072081 polymorphism and risk of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a meta-analysis

Evaluation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in human cases with orofacial clefts: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The interaction between several cell populations or many genes and the coordination of multiple signal transmission pathways can lead to defects such as orofacial clefts (OFCs). Herein, a systematic review was designed to evaluate a group of important biomarkers (matrix metalloproteinases [MMPs] and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases [TIMPs]) in human cases with OFCs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until March 10, 2023, without any restriction. STRING, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network software, was applied to investigate the functional interactions among the examined genes. The effect sizes including odds ratio (OR) dealing with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were extracted by the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.0 (CMA 2.0) software.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles were entered into the systematic review that four articles were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Single studies reported that several polymorphisms of MMPs (rs243865, rs9923304, rs17576, rs6094237, rs7119194, and rs7188573); and TIMPs (rs8179096, rs7502916, rs4789936, rs6501266, rs7211674, rs7212662, and rs242082) had an association with OFC risk. There was no significant difference for MMP-3 rs3025058 polymorphism in allelic (OR: 0.832; P=0.490), dominant (OR: 1.177; P=0.873), and recessive (OR: 0.363; P=0.433) models and MMP-9 rs17576 polymorphism in an allelic model (OR: 0.885; P=0.107) between the OFC cases and the controls. Based on immunohistochemistry reports, three MMPs (MMP-2, MMP-8, and MMP-9) and TIMP-2 had significant correlations with several other biomarkers in OFC cases.

CONCLUSIONS

MMPs and TIMPs can impact the tissue and cells affected by OFCs and the process of apoptosis. The interaction between some biomarkers with MMPs and TIMPs (e.g., TGFb1) in OFCs can be interesting for future research.

Rs28446116 in PTCH1 is associated with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate in the Ningxia population, China

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between PTCH1 single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP) and non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate (NSCL/P) in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous region and predict the function of single nucleotide polymorphism through bioinformatics analysis.

DESIGN

A case-control analysis of 31 single nucleotide polymorphism locus alleles on PTCH1 gene (504 cases and 455 controls) was performed to explore the association between PTCH1 gene polymorphisms and non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate in Ningxia region. Transcription factors, 3D single nucleotide polymorphism and other related information of single nucleotide polymorphism loci with statistical significance were screened by the case-control experiments, and then analyzed the corresponding transcription factors through the NCBI database.

RESULTS

The case-control study showed that 5 of the 31 single nucleotide polymorphism loci rs357564 (P = 0.0233), rs1805155 (P = 0.0371), rs28446116 (P = 0.0408), rs2282041 (P = 0.0439), rs56119276 (P = 0.0256) had statistically significant differences in allele frequencies between the case and control groups. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that EP300 and RUNX3, among the transcription factors associated with rs28446116, may be associated with the development of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate.

CONCLUSION

PTCH1 gene may be associated with the occurrence of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate in the Ningxia region, which may be related to the role of EP300 and RUNX3 in the development of cleft lip and palate.

Genetic Factors in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are the most common congenital birth defects in humans and immediately recognized at birth. The etiology remains complex and poorly understood and seems to result from multiple genetic and environmental factors along with gene-environment interactions. It can be classified into syndromic (30%) and nonsyndromic (70%) clefts. Nonsyndromic OFCs include clefts without any additional physical or cognitive deficits. Recently, various genetic approaches, such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS), candidate gene association studies, and linkage analysis, have identified multiple genes involved in the etiology of OFCs. This article provides an insight into the multiple genes involved in the etiology of OFCs. Identification of specific genetic causes of clefts helps in a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of OFC. In the near future, it helps to provide a more accurate diagnosis, genetic counseling, personalized medicine for better clinical care, and prevention of OFCs.