Variation in UK Deanery publication rates in the British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: where are the current 'hot spots'?

Publication performance of university maxillofacial surgeons in Germany

The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to benchmark the publication activities of German university departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The publication performance of staff surgeons (chief and consultants), documented by first or last authorship, from 37 German university departments was captured over a 10-year period (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019). All publications listed in PubMed were included. Additionally, the Impact Factor (IF) was determined. A total of 213 surgeons were identified, of whom 158 (74.2%) were publishing. The number of publications was 1,777, published in 311 journals. Publication activity ranged from an average of 23.3 publications per staff surgeon in the top-ranked department to 0 publications in the last-ranked. The same trend was observed for the total cumulative IFs (CIFs) per member (range from 56.2 to 0). The most common used journal was the Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (19.7%), with focus on "dentoalveolar surgery" (24%) and "operative techniques and procedures" (28.3%). Women constituted 19.2% of the staff, contributing to 8.5% of the publications. The publication performance of German university departments of oral and maxillofacial surgery exhibits a high variance, which did not correlate with the number of personnel and could only be explained by different research motivations.

Exploring the concerns of second-degree dental students on entering specialist OMFS training and their attitudes towards the second-degree curriculum

Within the UK, oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) is a competitive specialty with a rigorous training programme that currently requires dual degrees in both medicine and dentistry. Training in OMFS can present various challenges in terms of finances, length of training, and work-life balance. The current study explores the concerns of second-degree dental students in trying to obtain an OMFS specialty training post, as well as their views on the second-degree curriculum. An online survey was distributed via social media to second-degree dental students across the UK and 51 responses were received. Respondents cited a lack of publications (29%), specialty interviews (29%), and the OMFS logbook (29%) as the primary concerns about securing a higher training post. Eighty-eight per cent felt there were elements of repetition within the second degree for which competencies had already been achieved, and 88% agreed with streamlining the curriculum within the second degree. We propose that the second degree should incorporate ways to build the OMFS ST1/ST3 portfolio as part of a tailored curriculum, removing or condensing the repetitive elements, and instead emphasising areas of concern for trainees such as research, operative experience, and interview guidance. Second-degree students should be provided with mentors with an interest in research and academia to provide guidance and promote early interest in academia.

What are the concerns of second-degree medical students entering specialty OMFS training?

Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) applicants are faced with numerous challenges. Previous research has demonstrated that financial burden, length of OMFS training, and impact on personal life are cited as major drawbacks to pursuing the specialty, with trainees having concerns about the Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examinations. The current study aimed to explore second-degree medical students' concerns about obtaining a specialty training post in OMFS. An online survey was distributed via social media to second-degree students across the United Kingdom and 106 responses were received. A lack of publications and lack of involvement in research (54%) as well as attaining accreditation with the Royal College of Surgeons (27%) were cited as the primary and secondary concerns in relation to securing a higher training post. Seventy-five per cent of respondents had no first-author publications, 93% expressed concerns about passing the MRCS examination, and 73% had more than 40 OMFS procedures within their logbook. Second-degree medical students reported having ample clinical and operative experience in OMFS. Their main concerns were about research and MRCS examinations. To alleviate these concerns, BAOMS could provide educational initiatives and dedicated mentorship programmes for second-degree students, and could adopt a collaborative approach with discussion with major postgraduate training stakeholders.