Salvage total laryngectomy: is a flap necessary?

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap for the laryngopharyngectomy defect

BACKGROUND

Partial or total laryngopharyngectomy defects have traditionally been reconstructed using the radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, or jejunal free flaps. The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap (LDMFF) is an option for high-risk patients with complex laryngopharyngeal ± cutaneous neck defects.

METHODS

Retrospective single-surgeon case series from 2017 to 2022. Outcomes were assessed at both the back donor site and head and neck.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were identified. Flap survival was 100%. There was 1 (4.2%) pharyngocutaneous fistula and 2 (8.3%) tracheo-esophageal peristomal fistulas. At last follow-up, 17 (71%) were sustaining weight on oral intake, and 7 (29%) were G-tube dependent with 4 of these able to do some type of oral intake. Seven (29.2%) had post-operative stricture/stenosis requiring dilation. There were only minor donor site complications, all managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The LDMFF can be a robust reconstructive option, particularly for radiated high-risk patients with complex pharyngeal defects, including skin.

Vascularized Tissue to Reduce Fistula After Salvage Total Laryngectomy: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Salvage laryngectomy is more predisposed to complications than primary operations, with pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) being among the most challenging to manage. Vascularized flaps are increasingly employed during salvage laryngectomy, with a previous review finding a PCF incidence of 31.2% and 22.2% after primary and flap-assisted closure respectively. We aim to better define the role of vascularized flaps after salvage laryngectomy by performing an updated review comparing the rate of PCF in those undergoing primary or vascularized flap-assisted closure.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed/Medline, CINAHL, and CENTRAL.

REVIEW METHODS

An updated literature review was conducted of English language literature from 2003 to 2023. A random effects and network meta-analysis of odds ratios (OR) and pooled proportions were conducted.

RESULTS

Literature search found 31 studies, including seven from the previous review. Overall random effects pooled PCF rate was 25% (95% CI 0.21; 0.30, I2 = 72%, p = <0.01), whereas incidence in primary closure was 37% (95% CI 0.32; 0.43, I2 = 60%, p = <0.01) and 19% (95% CI 0.12; 0.20, I2 = 47%, p = <0.01) after flap closure. Pooled OR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.28; 0.55, I2 = 36%, p = 0.04) in favor of vascularized tissues. The number needed to treat was 6.5. The rate of PCF was lower after free and pedicled flaps, and on-lay and patch closure compared to primary closure techniques. Network meta-analysis found all combinations of closure techniques and vascularized tissue were superior to primary closure.

CONCLUSION

The updated analysis has demonstrated a widening in the rates of PCF between primary and vascularized flap-assisted closure. Surgeons should strongly consider the use of free or pedicled flaps in any salvage laryngectomy procedure. Laryngoscope, 134:2991-3002, 2024.

Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture in primary versus salvage laryngectomy: Short-term and long-term complications and functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is widely preferred for individuals who have not undergone prior radiation. However, there is no consensus on the relative utility of primary-fit TEP in the setting of salvage laryngectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center review was conducted of individuals undergoing laryngectomy with primary fit TEP between 2012 and 2018. Multivariable analysis was conducted to compare short-term and long-term complications, as well as speech and swallowing outcomes, of those who underwent primary versus salvage laryngectomy.

RESULTS

In this study, 134 patients underwent total laryngectomy with primary fit TEP. Aside from a higher rate of peristomal dehiscence (13.1% vs. 1.4%) found in the salvage group, there was no difference in incidence of all other complications, including pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. The groups had comparable speech and swallow outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Primary fit TEP is a safe and effective surgical choice for individuals undergoing salvage laryngectomy who desire a voice prosthesis.

A NSQIP study comparing surgical outcomes between primary and non-primary TEPs after total laryngectomy

OBJECTIVE

Tracheoesophageal puncture with voice prosthesis (TEP) is considered the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy; however, there is debate as to whether it should be inserted concurrently with removal of the larynx (primary TEP), or as a separate, additional procedure at a later date (secondary TEP). We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (NSQIP) to compare postoperative complications, readmission rates, and reoperation rates among individuals who underwent total laryngectomy with or without concurrent TEP placement.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2019. Patients were categorized into primary and non-primary TEP groups using a variation of CPT codes for total laryngectomy, tracheoesophageal prosthesis, and type of reconstruction. Univariate analyses were performed and significance was determined at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 1974 patients who underwent total laryngectomy were identified from the database: 1505 (77.3 %) in the non-primary TEP group and 442 (22.7 %) in the primary TEP group. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA class greater than or equal to three (91.2 % primary vs. 84.6 % non-primary, p < 0.001). Patients in the non-primary TEP group were also more likely to require intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions within the first 72 h of surgery (20.5 % non-primary vs. 15.3 % primary, p = 0.016). Both groups had similar rates of wound breakdown and dehiscence. There remained no significant difference based on type of reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients receiving primary TEPs are not at a greater risk of developing wound complications such as pharyngocutaneous fistulas in the 30-day postoperative period. This remained true when patients were stratified by type of flap reconstruction. Patients in the non-primary TEP group were more likely to have an ASA category of 3 or greater, which may explain why they experienced higher rates of complications such as blood transfusions intra-operatively or post-operatively.

Perioperative Factors Aggravating Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Total Laryngectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification

BACKGROUND

Pharyngocutaneous fistula formation represents a major postoperative complication following total laryngectomy. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula development after total laryngectomy and to identify factors that lead to severe cases of pharyngocutaneous fistula.

METHODS

Patients who underwent total laryngectomy between January 2013 and February 2021 were included in the study and were divided into 2 groups: Those with and without pharyngocutaneous fistula. The severity of pharyngocutaneous fistula was graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

Patients with pharyngocutaneous fistula experienced longer operative time, greater intraoperative blood loss, greater decrease in perioperative hemoglobin level, and longer postoperative hospitalization. Unlike in lower-severity cases, patients with grade IIIb pharyngocutaneous fistula underwent preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; preoperative treatment was thus a risk factor for higher severity of pharyngocutaneous fistula (odds ratio, 35; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Salvage laryngectomy was found to be a predictor of severe pharyngocutaneous fistula development. Prolonged operative time, increased intraoperative blood loss, and decreased postoperative hemoglobin level were found to be predictors of postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistula formation.

The Incidence and the Risk Factors for Pharyngocutaneous Fistula following Primary and Salvage Total Laryngectomy

The pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is the most common complication following a total laryngectomy (TL) with a wide range of incidence and various potential risk factors. The aim was to analyse the incidence and potential risk factors for PCF formation in a large study set collected over a longer period of time. In the retrospective study at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery of Ljubljana, 422 patients who were treated for head and neck cancer by TL between 2007 and 2020 were included. The comprehensive clinicopathologic data were collected including potential risk factors related to the patient, disease, surgical treatment and post-operative period for the development of fistulae. The patients were categorized into a group with the fistula (a study group) and one without it (a control group). The PCF then developed in 23.9% of patients. The incidence following a primary TL was 20.8% and 32.7% following salvage TL (p = 0.012). The results demonstrated that surgical wound infection, piriform sinus invasion, salvage TL, and total radiation dose were determined as independent risk factors for PCF formation. A diminishing surgical wound infection rate would contribute to a further reduction of the PCF rate.

Salvage Surgery

The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study propelled the combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy to the forefront of strategies used for the management of locally advanced laryngeal cancer. The organ preservation rate was 84%. However, over the past 30 years that these approaches have been in place, there have been concerns regarding long-term survival and high failure rates requiring salvage. Furthermore, salvage laryngectomy, if feasible when considering increased morbidity after CRT, is fraught with a higher risk of wound complications including fistula, longer hospitalization, and reduced quality of life.

Total Laryngectomy: A Review of Surgical Techniques

Since the first total laryngectomy was performed in the late 18th century, several improvements and variations in surgical techniques have been proposed for this procedure. The surgical techniques employed in total laryngectomy have not been comprehensively discussed to date. Thus, the main objective of this article was to address controversial aspects related to this procedure and compare different surgical techniques used for a total laryngectomy procedure from the beginning to the end.

Although the management paradigms in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas have shifted to organ-preserving chemoradiotherapy protocols, total laryngectomy still plays a prominent role in the treatment of advanced and recurrent tumors. The increased incidence of complications associated with salvage total laryngectomy has driven efforts to improve the surgical techniques in various aspects of the operation. Loss of voice and impaired swallowing are the most difficult challenges to be overcome in laryngectomies, and the introduction of tracheoesophageal voice prostheses has made an enormous difference in postoperative rehabilitation and quality of life. Advancements in reconstruction techniques, tumor control, and metastatic management, such as prophylactic neck treatments and paratracheal nodal dissection (PTND), as well as the use of thyroid gland-preserving total laryngectomy in selected patients have all led to the increasing success of modern total laryngectomy. Several conclusions regarding the benchmarking of surgical techniques cannot be drawn. Issues regarding total laryngectomy are still open for discussion, and the technique will continue to require improvement in the near future.

Pectoralis Major Onlay vs Interpositional Reconstruction Fistulation After Salvage Total Laryngectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the difference in pharygocutaneous fistula (PCF) development between pectoralis major flap onlay and interpositional reconstructions after salvage total laryngectomy (STL).

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review was performed during January 2020. English articles were included that described minor and major PCF rates after STL reconstructed with pectoralis major onlay or interposition. PCFs were classified as major when conservative therapy was unsuccessful and/or revision surgery was needed. Articles describing total laryngopharyngectomies were excluded. Meta-analyses of the resulting data were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles met final criteria amassing 1304 patients. Three articles compared onlay with interposition, and 18 compared onlay with primary closure. Pectoralis interposition demonstrated elevated odds ratio (OR) of PCF formation as compared with onlay (OR, 2.34; P < .001). Onlay reconstruction reduced overall (OR, 0.32; P < .001) and major (OR, 0.21; P < .001) PCF development as compared with primary pharyngeal closure alone. Data were insufficient to compare interposition against primary closure.

CONCLUSIONS

This research shows evidence that pectoralis onlay after STL diminishes the odds of total and major PCF development. Pectoralis interposition reconstruction showed elevated odds of PCF formation as compared with pectoralis onlay.

Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Primary and Salvage Total Laryngectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the oncological and functional outcomes of total laryngectomies (TL) performed as first line treatment or for salvage after failure of conservative approaches for treating advanced laryngeal carcinoma (LSCC).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A cohort of 217 patients who underwent TL was divided according to whether the procedure was for primary treatment of their LSCC (101 patients) or for recurrences after conservative surgery or chemo-radiotherapy (116 patients).

RESULTS

The overall survival rate and disease-specific survival rate were significantly higher in the primary TL group than in the salvage TL group (P = .04 and P = .01, respectively). The recurrence rate was significantly higher and the disease-free survival (in months) was shorter for patients who had salvage TL than for those who had primary TL (P = .00 and P = .01, respectively). The salvage TL group also included significantly more cases of postoperative pharyngo-cutaneous fistula needing salivary stent positioning, and experienced significantly longer hospital stays than the primary TL group (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Oncological and functional outcomes of primary TL were significantly better than after salvage TL. If salvage TL was performed after conservative surgery had failed, the oncological and functional results were better than after the failure of organ-preserving protocols. This could justify a first attempt at conservative surgery for intermediate-advanced LSCC in selected cases, reserving chemo-radiotherapy only for patients unsuitable for surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:E569-E575, 2021.

A Multidisciplinary Team Guided Approach to the Management of cT3 Laryngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 104 Cases

The optimal treatment for T3 laryngeal carcinoma (LC) is still a matter of debate. Different therapeutic options are available: Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs), total laryngectomy (TL), and organ preservation protocols (radiation therapy (RT) or chemo-radiation (CRT)). This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate oncologic outcomes of 104 T3 LCs treated by surgery or non-surgical approaches from January 2011 to December 2016 at a single academic tertiary referral center. Each case was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) devoted to the management of head and neck cancers. We divided the cohort into two subgroups: Group A, surgical treatment (TLM, OPHLs, TL) and Group B, non-surgical treatment (RT, CRT). For the entire cohort, two- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83% and 56%, respectively. The two- and five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 75% and 65%, and disease-specific survival rates were 93% and 70%, respectively. The N category was a significant independent prognosticator for OS (p = 0.02), whereas Group B was significantly and independently associated with DFS (HR 4.10, p = 0.006). Analyzing laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival as an outcome, it was found that this was significantly lower in higher N categories (p = 0.04) and in cases that underwent non-surgical treatments (p = 0.002). Optimization of oncologic outcomes in T3 LCs may be obtained only by a comprehensive MDT approach, considering that different treatment options have heterogenous toxicity profiles and indications.