The use of dextran post free tissue transfer

Novel Challenges and Opportunities for Anesthesia and Perioperative Care in Microvascular Flap Surgery: A Narrative Review

Complex microvascular techniques and in-depth knowledge of blood rheology and microanastomosis function are required for success in microvascular flap surgery. Substantial progress has been achieved in preventing complications, but the rate of flap loss is still significant and can have significant adverse effects on the patient. Flap thrombosis, flap hematoma, and flap loss are the most frequent and severe major surgical complications. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of different flap complications, the use of preoperative risk assessment and new treatment concepts could improve the perioperative care of microvascular flap surgery patients. Our aim was to outline novel avenues for best practice and provide an outlook for further research of anesthesia and perioperative care concepts in microvascular flap surgery.

Evidence-Based Approaches to Anticoagulation in Reconstructive Microsurgery-A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic review addresses the crucial role of anticoagulation in microsurgical procedures, focusing on free flap reconstruction and replantation surgeries. The objective was to balance the prevention of thrombotic complications commonly leading to flap failure, with the risk of increased bleeding complications associated with anticoagulant use. A meticulous PubMed literature search following Evidence-Based-Practice principles yielded 79 relevant articles, including both clinical and animal studies. The full-texts were carefully reviewed and evaluated by the modified Coleman methodology score. Clinical studies revealed diverse perioperative regimens, primarily based on aspirin, heparin, and dextran. Meta-analyses demonstrated similar flap loss rates with heparin or aspirin. High doses of dalteparin or heparin, however, correlated with higher flap loss rates than low dose administration. Use of dextran is not recommended due to severe systemic complications. In animal studies, systemic heparin administration showed predominantly favorable results, while topical application and intraluminal irrigation consistently exhibited significant benefits in flap survival. The insights from this conducted systematic review serve as a foundational pillar towards the establishment of evidence-based guidelines for anticoagulation in microsurgery. An average Coleman score of 55 (maximum 103), indicating low overall study quality, however, emphasizes the need for large multi-institutional, randomized-clinical trials as the next vital step.

Intraoperative Infusion of Dextran Confers No Additional Benefit after Carotid Endarterectomy but Is Associated with Increased Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiac Events

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative dextran infusion has been associated with reduction of an embolic risk in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Nonetheless, dextran has been associated with adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, hemorrhage, cardiac, and renal complications. Herein, we aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of CEA stratified by the use of intraoperative dextran infusion using a large multiinstitutional dataset.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA between 2008 and 2022 from the Vascular Quality Initiative database were reviewed. Patients were categorized by use of intraoperative dextran infusion, and demographics, procedural data, and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to adjust for differences in patients while assessing the association between postoperative outcomes and intraoperative infusion of dextran.

RESULTS

Of 140,893 patients undergoing CEA, 9,935 (7.1%) patients had intraoperative dextran infusion. Patients with intraoperative dextran infusion were older with lower rates of symptomatic stenosis (24.7% vs. 29.3%; P < 0.001) and preoperative use of antiplatelets, anticoagulants and statins. Additionally, they were more likely to have severe carotid stenosis (>80%; 49% vs. 45%; P < 0.001) and undergo CEA under general anesthesia (96.4% vs. 92.3%; P < 0.001), with a more frequent use of shunt (64.4% vs. 49.5%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, multivariable analysis showed that intraoperative dextran infusion was associated with higher odds of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including myocardial infarction [MI] (odds ratio [OR], 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.3, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure [CHF] (OR, 2.15, 95% CI: 1.67-2.77, P = 0.001), and hemodynamic instability requiring vasoactive agents (OR, 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.13, P = 0.001). However, it was not associated with decreased odds of stroke (OR, 0.92, 95% CI: 0.74-1.16, P = 0.489) or death (OR, 0.88, 95% CI: 0.58-1.35, P = 0.554). These trends persisted even when stratified by symptomatic status and degree of stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative infusion of dextran was associated with increased odds of MACE, including MI, CHF, and persistent hemodynamic instability, without decreasing the risk of stroke perioperatively. Given these results, judicious use of dextran in patients undergoing CEA is recommended. Furthermore, careful perioperative cardiac management is warranted in select patients receiving intraoperative dextran during CEA.

Multidisciplinary Practice Variations of Anti-Thrombotic Strategies for Free Tissue Transfers

Background: Venous thrombosis, the leading cause of free flap failure, may have devastating consequences. Many anti-thrombotic agents and protocols have been described for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thrombosis in free flaps. Methods: National surveys were distributed to microsurgeons (of both Plastics and ENT training) and hematology and thrombosis specialists. Data were collected on routine screening practices, perceived risk factors for flap failure, and pre-, intra-, and post-operative anti-thrombotic strategies. Results: There were 722 surveys distributed with 132 (18%) respondents, consisting of 102 surgeons and 30 hematologists. Sixty-five surgeons and 9 hematologists routinely performed or managed patients with free flaps. The top 3 perceived risk factors for flap failure according to surgeons were medical co-morbidities, past arterial thrombosis, and thrombophilia. Hematologists, however, reported diabetes, smoking, and medical co-morbidities as the most important risk factors. Fifty-four percent of physicians routinely used unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as a preoperative agent. Surgeons routinely flushed the flap with heparin (37%), used UFH IV (6%), or both (8%) intra-operatively. Surgeons used a range of post-operative agents such as UFH, LMWH, aspirin, and dextran while hematologists preferred LMWH. There was variation of management strategies if flap thrombosis occurred. Different strategies consisted of changing recipient vessels, UFH IV, flushing the flap, adding post-operative agents, or a combination of strategies. Conclusions: There are diverse practice variations in anti-thrombotic strategies for free tissue transfers and a difference in perceived risk factors for flap failure that may affect patient management.

The Effects of Dextran on Postoperative Thrombosis and Hemodilution in Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Free tissue transfer is an integral part of reconstructive head and neck surgery today. Although increased experience and refinements in techniques have minimized flap loss, pharmacological agents have been used to prevent thrombus formation and flap failures, despite their questionable effectiveness. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of dextran 40 in thrombosis prophylaxis, as well as its effects on blood coagulability and flap survival.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 176 free flaps performed at University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia, during a 4-year period. A comparison was made between 2 patient groups, based on their respective postoperative prophylaxis protocols. All patients were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin as deep vein thrombosis prevention, until patient mobilization. Group 1 was on dextran 40 protocol, whereas group 2 did not receive additional treatment. Primary outcome of the study was determined as flap loss rate, whereas secondary outcome was evaluated as the rate of thrombosis or hemorrhage. The hemodilution potential of dextran 40 was examined through blood count laboratory values.

RESULTS

Total flap survival rate was 90.34%. There were 16 free flap losses and 1 partial loss overall. Anastomoses were re-explored in a total of 27 cases, of which 17 were salvaged. There were 29 events of hemorrhage or arterial or venous thrombosis: 17 in group 1 and 12 in group 2. A sum of 26 incidences of other postoperative complications was recorded, 13 in each group. Hemodilution status showed a statistically significant reduction in erythrocyte count and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels in the group receiving dextran 40, on postoperative days 1 and 3, but no such effect was observed on postoperative platelet count.

CONCLUSIONS

Although dextran 40 has been shown to have a valuable effect on hemodilution, which is beneficial in microsurgery, it did not demonstrate better outcomes in terms of flap survival. Because it can cause serious systemic complications, it is better not to administer it routinely. However, its important influence on reduction in erythrocyte count and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels should be further investigated.

Postoperative Management and Rehabilitation of the Replanted or Revascularized Digit

Postoperative care of amputated digits begins before replantation. Detailed informed consent should be obtained and completion amputation discussed if revascularization is not ultimately successful. Complications and failure of the replanted digit should also be addressed. Postoperative pharmacologic treatment should consist of aspirin, at minimum. Complications, such as venous congestion or occlusion, and arterial thrombosis, should be dealt with expediently. Digital motion rehabilitation should start after 5 to 7 days of digital viability and splinting of the affected digit. Early protective motion protocol is implemented to maintain digital motion with emphasis on tendon glide and joint motion.

Appropriate Use of Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin after Digital Replantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving Three Groups

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the appropriate use of unfractionated heparin as an anticoagulation agent after digital replantation.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, blinded-endpoint method, three-arm, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial conducted at a single institution. A total of 88 patients (101 fingers) following digital amputation and subsequent repair by anastomosis of both arteries and veins were randomly allocated into three groups: (1) control group (no heparin dose), (2) low-dose heparin group (10,000 IU/day), and (3) high-dose heparin group (start at 15,000 IU/day, then adjust the dose to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time of 1.5 to 2.5 times the baseline). The outcomes were assessed regarding the proportion of success at 2 weeks after replantation of amputated digits, total or partial necrosis, and occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among the three groups, except for complications of congestion. The odds ratio of the heparin group compared with the control group for a success proportion was 5.40 (95 percent CI, 0.85 to 34.20; p = 0.027) in subjects aged 50 years or older. Significant elevations of activated partial thromboplastin time, aspartate transaminase, and alanine aminotransferase occurred in high-dose heparin groups on day 7.

CONCLUSION

Unfractionated heparin administration is considered effective for patients aged 50 years or older, although the routine use of unfractionated heparin is not necessary after digital replantation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Thromboprophylaxis in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

Head and neck patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction are at high risk for thromboembolism. While the prevention of thromboembolism has become an essential aspect of care, within the field of microsurgery, concern for anastomotic complications have hindered the creation of an accepted regimen. The aim of this review was to evaluate the risks and benefits of prophylactic agents for thromboprophylaxis. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/NCBI databases. Articles discussing thromboprophylaxis in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, or microvascular reconstruction were considered in the review from the past 30 years. The majority of patients undergoing microvascular surgery have multiple risk factors for thrombus formation. Several consensus guidelines exist for the prophylaxis in patients who are critically ill, undergoing surgery, or with malignancy. Significant evidence supports the routine use of mechanical means, such as early mobilization and pneumatic compression along with subcutaneous heparin. Low-molecular-weight heparin is also frequently utilized, although results are largely divided. Data on aspirin remain equivocal. Studies on microvascular failure and flap loss have demonstrated little to no association with chemoprophylaxis. The evidence for postoperative thromboprophylaxis regimens in patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer is variable. Multiple studies have supported the use of unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin. There appears to be an expert consensus for the combined use of mechanical prophylactic methods and chemical prophylaxis. Prospective randomized trials are required to validate the most effective combination of chemoprophylaxis agents.

Towards standardization of training and practice of reconstructive microsurgery: an evidence-based recommendation for anastomosis thrombosis prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Despite significant improvements in survival rates, free flap failures still occur even in experienced hands and are most commonly due to arterial or venous thrombosis. In the absence of an evidence-based guideline on the prevention of thrombosis, we reviewed the literature to assess the evidence base for commonly used interventions aimed at its prevention.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the following keywords "free flap" and microsurgery with "pre-operative screening," "prevention of thrombosis," "ketorolac," "heparin," "low molecular weight heparin," "aspirin," "dextran," and "statins."

RESULTS

Thirteen clinical studies were included in this review. No high-level evidence is available to support any perioperative or postoperative interventions aimed at reducing the risk of flap thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher level studies are needed to investigate the clinical use of antithrombotic medications in microsurgery; however, given the small failure rates in modern practice, these will need to be large multicenter trials in order to reach sufficient power.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.

Postoperative anticoagulation after free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative use of anticoagulation after free tissue transfer in head and neck ablative procedures is common practice, but a clear protocol has not been well established. The outcome measures including total flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma formation for different anticoagulation regimens in free tissue transfer in the head and neck were reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases were examined for patients who underwent free tissue transfer following head and neck ablative procedures.

REVIEW METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were utilized to identify English-language studies reporting anticoagulation regimens following free tissue transfer in head and neck ablative procedures. Outcomes included total flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma formation. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the articles by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

RESULTS

A total of 368 articles were identified. An additional 36 articles were identified through screening of reference lists. Twenty-one of these studies met final inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Outcome data on total flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma formation were extracted and analyzed for comparison against all anticoagulation regimens. Total flap failure, thrombosis, and hematoma formation rates were 4.4%, 4.5%, and 2.2%, respectively. Individual study rates ranged from 0.0% to 10.7%, 0.0% to 10.4%, and 0.6% to 7.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is not adequate evidence to develop a standardized anticoagulation protocol for head and neck free flap procedures. Comparable flap complications were reported between all the employed anticoagulation methods studied, though significant variability in study design among articles existed. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted to determine the optimal postoperative anticoagulation regimen following free tissue transfer of the head and neck. Laryngoscope, 128:412-421, 2018.

Breast free flap complications related to haematoma formation - do the risks of multiple antithrombotics outweigh the benefits today?

Background Free flap reconstruction is today a common operation for many breast cancer patients, but local protocols for microsurgery still predict the use of antithrombotic agents. Reduced operation times and complication rates together with faster mobilisation, after introduction of perforator flaps, call for less comprehensive antithrombotic regimens. It was hypothesised that multiple antithrombotics was a risk factor for bleeding-related flap complications. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to study the association between reoperation for haematoma and flap-related complications after free flap breast reconstruction. A combination of heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin and dextran were used as antithrombotics. A sub-analysis was performed to compare non-dextran to dextran treated patients. Results One hundred and thirty-nine patients were identified, reconstructed with 150 consecutive perforator free flaps to the breast. Reoperation for breast haematoma (13%) was associated with concomitant re-operation for venous congestion (8.6%) (p < 0.001), but also for flap thrombosis (2.9%) (p = 0.007), highlighting haematoma as a risk factor for flap-related complications. An increased rate of haematoma re-operations of the breast was noted among the flap-related complications in the dextran (n = 79), compared to the non-dextran group (p = 0.011). Conclusion The current study highlights the use of multiple antithrombotics as a risk factor for haematoma reoperation. Liberal use of drains and evacuation of breast haematomas are, therefore, indicated together with limitation of antithrombotic agents. The highly variable use of antithrombotic agents worldwide call for evidence-based guidelines in standardised free flap breast reconstruction.

Microsurgery and the Hypercoagulable State: A Hematologist's Perspective

Hypercoagulability can pose a significant problem in microsurgical reconstruction. Here, the authors provide a comprehensive review of macrovascular and microvascular clotting phenomena from the unique viewpoint of two microsurgeons and a hematologist. The authors review the literature surrounding prevention of microvascular clots and provide an extensive discussion of hereditary thrombophilia. The authors also make explicit recommendations regarding the utility of thrombophilia testing and preoperative and perioperative management strategies for patients with hypercoagulability.

Intraoperative use of dextran is associated with cardiac complications after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Although dextran has been theorized to diminish the risk of stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA), variation exists in its use. We evaluated outcomes of dextran use in patients undergoing CEA to clarify its utility.

METHODS

We studied all primary CEAs performed by 89 surgeons within the Vascular Study Group of New England database (2003-2010). Patients were stratified by intraoperative dextran use. Outcomes included perioperative death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and congestive heart failure (CHF). Group and propensity score matching was performed for risk-adjusted comparisons, and multivariable logistic and gamma regressions were used to examine associations between dextran use and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 6641 CEAs performed, with dextran used in 334 procedures (5%). Dextran-treated and untreated patients were similar in age (70 years) and symptomatic status (25%). Clinical differences between the cohorts were eliminated by statistical adjustment. In crude, group-matched, and propensity-matched analyses, the stroke/death rate was similar for the two cohorts (1.2%). Dextran-treated patients were more likely to suffer postoperative MI (crude: 2.4% vs 1.0%; P = .03; group-matched: 2.4% vs 0.6%; P = .01; propensity-matched: 2.4% vs 0.5%; P = .003) and CHF (2.1% vs 0.6%; P = .01; 2.1% vs 0.5%; P = .01; 2.1% vs 0.2%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis of the crude sample, dextran was associated with a higher risk of postoperative MI (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-7.64) and CHF (odds ratio, 5.71; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-13.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Dextran use was not associated with lower perioperative stroke but was associated with higher rates of MI and CHF. Taken together, our findings suggest limited clinical utility for routine use of intraoperative dextran during CEA.

Postoperative care and monitoring of the reconstructed head and neck patient

Reconstruction of head and neck patients using free tissue transfer is perhaps the most challenging of areas in the human body. Although complications are inevitable in a percentage of patients, it is good postoperative care and monitoring that determines the success or failure of the reconstruction and also permits early salvage of a failing free flap. Teamwork and cooperation among members of the reconstructive team are critical. Here we review the significance of clinical care and monitoring of reconstructed head and neck patients in the intraoperative and postoperative periods. We also review different techniques and strategies for flap monitoring and anticoagulation used for free tissue transfers.

The outcome of prostaglandin-E1 and dextran-40 compared to no antithrombotic therapy in head and neck free tissue transfer: analysis of 1,351 cases in a single center

Free tissue transfer has become a popular technique for soft tissue defect reconstruction in head and neck cancer ablation. Although high success rates and good reliability of free flaps are proven, microvascular thrombosis is still the most critical issue for microsurgeons. Pharmacological antithrombotic agents are widely used but their efficacy is still debated. In this study, we analyzed whether prostaglandin-E1 (PGE1) and dextran-40 can improve the outcomes compared to no antithrombotic therapy at all. We retrospectively reviewed 1,351 free flaps performed for head and neck reconstruction after cancer ablation. Three groups defined were 232 flaps received PGE1, 283 flaps received dextran-40, and 836 received no antithrombotic therapy. The demographics of these three groups indicated no statistical differences. The results showed that flap survival revealed no significant difference among PGE1, dextran-40, and control group (P = 0.734). There was a tendency to hematomas in PGE1 group (P = 0.056) when compared with other two groups. Dextran-40 significantly increased flap failure rate in high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus (P = 0.006) or hypertension (P = 0.003), when compared with PGE1 and control group. These results revealed antithrombotic therapy with PGE1 and dextran-40 do not determine a significant improvement in flap survival.

Prevention of thrombosis after microvascular tissue transfer in the head and neck. A review of the literature and the state of affairs in Dutch Head and Neck Cancer Centers

Free vascularized graft or free-flap reconstruction is frequently used in the reconstruction of defects in head and neck oncology patients. A common complication in free-flap surgery is thrombosis. Thrombosis occurs in 8-14% of cases and often leads to flap failure. A review of the literature on this subject was carried out and Dutch head and neck cancer centres were asked to share their guidelines concerning the prevention of thrombosis after free vascularized graft surgery. No consensus in the literature was found on how thrombosis could best be prevented. The Dutch Head and Neck Cancer Centers use routine deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis to prevent thrombosis in the anastomosis. It was also concluded that non-pharmacologic measures for preventing thrombosis, such as meticulous microvascular surgery and smoking cessation prior to the operation, are thought to play an important role in the prevention of thrombosis in microvascular free-flap reconstructions. It has not been determined which pre- and postoperative pharmacologic measure can prevent thrombosis most effectively. A pharmacologic regimen to prevent thrombosis that is customized to the patient is suggested. This should be based on an individual risk profile for the development of thrombosis.