The subcostal artery perforator flap; an anatomical study

The lumbar artery perforator flap: clinical review and guidance on image reporting

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap is a relatively new procedure that can be utilized to manage lumbosacral defects in addition to reconstructing distal body parts as well, such as breast reconstruction. This fasciocutaneous flap is designed based on the LAPs small arteries that emerge from the lumbar arteries then move superficially piercing overlying tissues to perforate the lumbar fascia and supply the skin and subcutaneous tissue; However, anatomical and clinical studies regarding the LAP flap and its perforators are sparse in the literature, and the results are even contradicting. This article will discuss the LAP flap, the anatomy of its perforators, and the clinical aspects about its usage. In addition, we explore its preoperative imaging evaluation, and deliver a guide on image reporting and radiological data that will benefit the surgeon most during the procedure.

Experimental study of pedicled subcostal artery perforator (SCAP) flap: A new application in breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Latissimus dorsi flap is the gold standard for pedicled breast reconstruction but is limited by donor site scarring, which is difficult to conceal, and a high rate of post-operative seroma. We investigated the anatomic characteristics and feasibility of using a subcostal artery perforator (SCAP) flap, which was taken from the flank area and vascularised by a perforator artery through a subcostal pedicle, for a breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken to determine the anatomy of the SCAP flap pedicle and the vascular supply to this dermal-fat flap. Pedicled SCAP flaps were dissected on cadavers to identify the anatomy of the perforator arteries and the pedicle length. Pedicled SCAP flaps were then tunnelled through the chest area to evaluate their feasibility for breast reconstruction.

RESULTS

Twelve SCAP flaps were prepared on six cadavers. Mean pedicle length was 17 cm (14.5-20 cm). Mean flap size was 13 × 18 cm (11.5 × 15.5-15 × 21 cm). For each flap, a pedicle of sufficient length was dissected to allow the tunnelling of the flap and to perform breast reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap of adequate size. In all cases, an SCAP flap was prepared, without taking muscle, to reduce the risk of parietal complications at the donor site in future clinical applications.

CONCLUSION

Pedicled SCAP flap is a feasible option in breast reconstruction and could represent a less arduous surgical alternative to free flaps for some patients. Donor site scarring was acceptable. Clinical application of SCAP flaps should be investigated further.

3D Volumetric Modeling and Microvascular Reconstruction of Irradiated Lumbosacral Defects after Oncologic Resection

Background

Locoregional flaps are sufficient in most sacral reconstructions. However, large sacral defects due to malignancy necessitate a different reconstructive approach, with local flaps compromised by radiation and regional flaps inadequate for broad surface areas or substantial volume obliteration. In this report, we present our experience using free muscle transfer for volumetric reconstruction, in such cases, and demonstrate three-dimensional (3D) haptic models of the sacral defect to aid preoperative planning.

Methods

Five consecutive patients with irradiated sacral defects secondary to oncologic resections were included, surface area ranging from 143–600 cm². Latissimus dorsi (LD)-based free flap sacral reconstruction was performed in each case, between 2005 and 2011. Where the superior gluteal artery was compromised, the subcostal artery (SA) was used as a recipient vessel. Microvascular technique, complications, and outcomes are reported. The use of volumetric analysis and 3D printing is also demonstrated, with imaging data converted to 3D images suitable for 3D printing with Osirix software (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland). An office-based, desktop 3D printer was used to print 3D models of sacral defects, used to demonstrate surface area and contour and produce a volumetric print of the dead space needed for flap obliteration.

Results

The clinical series of LD free flap reconstructions is presented, with successful transfer in all cases, and adequate soft-tissue cover and volume obliteration achieved. The original use of the SA as a recipient vessel was successfully achieved. All wounds healed uneventfully. 3D printing is also demonstrated as a useful tool for 3D evaluation of volume and dead space.

Conclusion

Free flaps offer unique benefits in sacral reconstruction where local tissue is compromised by irradiation and tumor recurrence, and dead space requires accurate volumetric reconstruction. We describe for the first time the use of the SA as a recipient in free flap sacral reconstruction. 3D printing of haptic bio-models is a rapidly evolving field with a substantial role in preoperative planning.