Steven L, Cherian A, Yankovic F, Mathur A, Kulkarni M, Cuckow P. Current practice in paediatric hypospadias surgery; a specialist survey.
J Pediatr Urol 2013;
9:1126-30. [PMID:
23683539 DOI:
10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.04.008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Accepted: 04/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM
To undertake an online survey of current hypospadias surgery practice among those specialists attending the IVth World Congress of the International Society for Hypospadias and Disorders of Sex Development (ISHID), 2011.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An online survey covering 22 separate questions relating to proximal and distal hypospadias surgery was set up, and all delegates registered for the conference were invited to complete this questionnaire anonymously. The data was analysed by three of the authors.
RESULTS
A total of 162 delegates registered for the conference of whom 74% were paediatric surgeons, paediatric urologists, plastic surgeons and adult/adolescent urologists. 93 delegates completed the online survey, and most of them (57%) were from Europe. The majority of surgeons see over 20 new patients/year (90%) and perform primary hypospadias surgery in over 20 patients/year (76%). The tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair is the most frequent technique used for the management of distal hypospadias (59%); other techniques used included Mathieu, onlay and TIP with graft. A variety of techniques are used for proximal hypospadias, but nearly half of the respondents (49%) preferred a staged approach. Self reported complication rates for distal hypospadias surgery are favourable (less than 10%) for 78% of the respondents. However, proximal hypospadias complication rates are higher.
CONCLUSIONS
With a majority of paediatric urologists and European delegates responding to our survey, the results suggest that there are differences in the management of proximal and distal hypospadias between surgeons, yet no differences were observed according to the region of their practice. Variations in long-term outcomes appear to be in keeping with the current literature.
Collapse