Experience with the Mentor Contour Profile Becker-35 expandable implants in reconstructive breast surgery

Immediate breast reconstruction in high-risk cases using an anatomically shaped permanent expandable implant

BACKGROUND

Anatomically shaped permanent expandable implants are dual-chambered devices, which allow their postoperative expansion for the adjustment of volume. Their use is optional when 1-stage immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) direct to permanent implant is not feasible. The aim of this study is to present one center's long-term experience with the anatomical Becker expandable implant in a large series of patients who underwent either IBR or a salvage procedure for IBR with the device.

METHODS

The records of 141 patients (a total of 161 breasts) who underwent IBR with the Becker implant were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Indications for this procedure included reduced skin envelopes, compromised skin flaps, salvage procedures, and single-stage procedures in patients with major comorbidities.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three devices (76%) involved IBR and 38 devices (24%) were salvage cases after direct-to-implant IBR. The device was used in a previously radiated breast in 36 cases (22%). Long-term follow-up demonstrated that 99 devices (61.5%) had been exchanged or removed and that only 62 devices (38.5%) remained as permanent implants. Removal of the device was associated with prior breast radiation and advanced age.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Becker device in high-risk IBR cases had a low retention rate as a permanent implant. Favorable indications for the use of this device in IBR cases include contralateral breast augmentation and patients with major comorbidities, which demonstrated a higher retention rate. Other indications for high-risk IBR cases could probably benefit using a 2-stage tissue-expander and implant technique.

Risk Factor Analysis for Survival of Becker-Type Expander in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction with a Becker-type expander is a common technique following mastectomy. However, inconsistency remains in the literature regarding risk factors for the survival of a Becker-type expander following immediate breast reconstruction. This study's purpose is to investigate possible risk factors for the Becker-type expander survival and to evaluate the complications related to expander removal following immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive women who underwent a mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction with a Becker-type expander from November 2010 to November 2016. Electronic medical records were analyzed retrospectively for demographic, clinical, operative characteristics, and outcomes. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for the survival of the Becker-type expander following immediate breast reconstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 74 Becker-type expanders were used in 72 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction. The patients' ages ranged from 27 to 71 years, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 44.6 ± 9.1 years. The most frequent complication was capsular contracture which occurred in 25 breasts (33.8%) followed by mastectomy skin flap necrosis in 6 breasts (8.1%), seroma in 4 breasts (5.4%), nipple-areolar complex necrosis in 4 breasts (5.4%), hematoma in 3 breasts (4.1%), and infection in 2 breasts (2.7%). The mean intraoperative expander fill volume (109.6 ± 66.9 cc [p = 0.039]) and mean total volume (386.5 ± 94.7 cc [p = 0.034]) were both significantly lower for patients with capsular contracture compared with those without capsular contracture. In patients with partial NAC necrosis, the mean mastectomy specimen volume (737.5 ± 242.8 cc) was significantly higher compared with patients without partial NAC necrosis (489.8 ± 219.0 cc; p = 0.027). A univariate Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and neoadjuvant therapy were significantly associated with expander removal (p = 0.023 and p = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The total volume of the expander and intraoperative fill volume of the expander appear to be predictive factors in the development of capsular contracture. However, there is no statistically significant association between radiotherapy and capsular contracture or expander survival in contrast with other published reports. Our findings reveal that the main risk factors for the survival of Becker-type expanders following immediate breast reconstruction are smoking and neoadjuvant therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the most likely risk factors associated with Becker-type expander survival in immediate breast reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Breast Tissue Expanders with Magnetic Ports: Clinical Experience at 1.5 T

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate breast tissue expanders with magnetic ports for safety in patients undergoing abdominal/pelvic magnetic resonance angiography before autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T was performed in 71 patients in prone position with tissue expanders with magnetic ports labeled "MR Unsafe" from July of 2012 to May of 2014. Patients were monitored during magnetic resonance angiography for tissue expander-related symptoms, and the chest wall tissue adjacent to the tissue expander was examined for injury at the time of tissue expander removal for breast reconstruction. Retrospective review of these patients' clinical records was performed. T2-weighted fast spin echo, steady-state free precession and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient echo sequences were assessed for image artifacts.

RESULTS

No patient had tissue expander or magnetic port migration during the magnetic resonance examination and none reported pain during scanning. On tissue expander removal (71 patients, 112 implants), the surgeons reported no evidence of tissue damage, and there were no operative complications at those sites of breast reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen and pelvis in patients with certain breast tissue expanders containing magnetic ports can be performed safely at 1.5 T for pre-autologous flap breast reconstruction perforator vessel mapping.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Innovative combination of therapeutic mammoplasty and expandable-implant breast augmentation for immediate partial breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic mammoplasty is used in the treatment of suitably-sized and appropriately-located breast cancers to achieve adequate cancer excision, resulting in well-shaped but smaller breasts. In patients wishing to maintain or increase their breast size, simultaneous augmentation will be required.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 48-year-old female underwent an "augmentation-therapeutic mastopexy". She required mastectomy for a multifocal cancer of the right breast and breast conservation for a unifocal localised cancer in the upper part of the left breast. She requested right immediate breast reconstruction and hoped for larger breasts than she had. Due to complications during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the right reconstruction plan was changed from a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap to an implant-based technique. On the left, an extended superomedial pedicle therapeutic mammoplasty was combined with a subpectoral augmentation using an expandable-implant.

DISCUSSION

The use of expandable-implants for reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects in combination with therapeutic mammoplasty has not been reported. This case report shows that such "augmentation-therapeutic mastopexy" is feasible.

CONCLUSION

A "novel" oncoplastic technique herein termed "augmentation-therapeutic mastopexy" is described for partial breast reconstruction during the treatment of a patient with bilateral breast cancer. It enabled adequate treatment of her cancer while reshaping the breast and achieving the desired larger breast size. It should be considered in selected breast-conservation patients who wish to maintain or increase their breast size.

Risk Factors Associated With Complication Rates of Becker-Type Expander Implants in Relation to Implant Survival: Review of 314 Implants in 237 Patients

Although autologous tissue reconstruction is the best option for breast reconstruction, using implants is still a reliable and simple method, offering acceptable aesthetic results. Becker-type implants are permanent implants that offer a 1-stage reconstructive option. A retrospective study was carried out in our center reviewing the clinical reports of 237 patients, in whom a total of 314 Becker-type prostheses were implanted. Overall survival was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios. At the end of the study, 214 expanders (68.15%) presented no complications, 40 (12.47%) developed significant capsular contracture, in 27 (8.60%) infection occurred, 24 (7.64%) suffered minor complications, and 9 (2.87%) ruptured. The mean survival time of the expanders was 120.41 months (95% CI: 109.62, 131.19). Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, high Molecular Immunology Borstel, age, mastectomy performed previously to the implant, ductal carcinoma, advanced tumoral stage, experience of the surgeon, and Becker 35-type implants were significantly related to a high number of complications in relation to the survival of the implants. Cox regression analysis revealed that the main risk factors for the survival of expander implants included radiotherapy and surgeon experience. The complication hazard ratio or relative risk caused by these 2 factors was 1.976 and 1.680, respectively. One-stage reconstruction using Becker-type expanders is an appropriate, simple, and reliable option in delayed breast reconstruction in patients who have not received radiotherapy and as long as the procedure is carried out by surgeons skilled in the technique.