Cost-effective plastic surgery skills training

Advancing Surgical Education: A Comprehensive Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Novel Approach to Training Models for Local Skin Advancement Flaps

Performing local skin flaps is a challenging task that requires cognitive and technical skills to design flaps with proper orientation to avoid distorting normal anatomy. Junior trainees need adequate exposure to gain confidence and expertise in such procedures. This article systematically reviews the literature's different local skin advancement flap training models and describes a new, easy-to-use training model. A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from their inception until August 2022 for articles about local skin advancement flap training models. The meta-analysis results were pooled across the studies using a random-effects model and presented as a weighted mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Out of 773 reviewed articles, 18 were included in the systematic review, and four reported enough data to be included in the meta-analysis. Rhomboid and Z-plasty flaps were the most commonly taught flaps by training models. The most commonly used training models were synthetic-based, followed by animal-based models. The training models significantly increased the trainees' confidence and expertise regarding local skin flap procedures (p<0.00001) for both domains. Training models, per our reported data, significantly improve the trainees' confidence and expertise in performing local skin advancement flap procedures; continuous efforts in developing and establishing new, simple-to-use, and effective training models are strongly encouraged to further improvement of surgical education and enhance the trainees' surgical skills.

Simulation in Upper and Lower Limb Trauma Skill Acquisition: A Review

SUMMARY STATEMENT

This review aimed to explore the published evidence with regard to the types and composition of both full- and part-task trainers to teach surgeons extremity exploration procedures in limb trauma management. Studies were included if they reported the development and/or validation of synthetic or virtual task trainers. Studies were evaluated to determine their derivation, usability, and clinical utility.A total of 638 citations were identified and 63 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Twenty-five articles addressed simulator validation and 36 addressed level of learning achieved with simulator engagement. Two studies described a dedicated limb simulator. Simulators were developed to repair limb structures including skin (n = 15), tendon (n = 7), nerve (n = 1), fascia (n = 1), muscle (n = 1), vascular (n = 24), and bone (n = 11). Considerations such as material fidelity, learning outcomes, cost or reusability, validity, and effectiveness are inconsistently reported. Future studies should address design standards for the effective production of synthetic or virtual simulators for limb trauma management.

Mind the Gap: a Competency-Based Scoping Review of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Reported Simulation Training Models

BACKGROUND

Simulation training has become an integral part of plastic surgery postgraduate curricula. It facilitates the acquisition of skills in a safe environment that can be later transferred to real-life settings. A variety of models have been described covering some aspects of the specialty better than others. The aim of this study was to identify and classify all the previously reported plastic surgery simulation models and the possible gaps having the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) list of competencies as a guide.

METHODS

Through a Delphi process, the complete list of ACGME minimum requirements for certification was analyzed to identify domains amenable for simulation training. A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed looking for all previously reported simulation models in plastic surgery. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and parallel blind review were used to identify eligible models.

RESULTS

A total of 81 ACGME competencies were identified. Following a 3-round Delphi process, consensus was reached on 19 reconstructive and 15 aesthetic surgery domains suitable for simulation training. 1667 articles were initially retrieved from Pubmed, of which 66 articles were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive (65%), quasi-experimental (24%) and experimental studies (11%) were found. For the 34 identified ACGME competencies, there were simulation models described for 58.8% of these, mostly covering reconstructive surgery (84.2%) while for aesthetic surgery it was 13.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review has identified that there are still gaps in ACGME competencies that could benefit from new simulation training models, especially in those related to aesthetic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Animal models in plastic and reconstructive surgery simulation-a review

BACKGROUND

The use of live and cadaveric animal models in surgical training is well established as a means of teaching and improving surgical skill in a controlled setting. We aim to review, evaluate, and summarize the models published in the literature that are applicable to Plastic Surgery training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search for keywords relating to animal models in Plastic Surgery and the associated procedures was conducted. Animal models that had cross over between specialties such as microsurgery with Neurosurgery and pinnaplasty with ear, nose, and throat surgery were included as they were deemed to be relevant to our training curriculum. A level of evidence and recommendation assessment was then given to each surgical model.

RESULTS

Our review found animal models applicable to plastic surgery training in four major categories namely-microsurgery training, flap raising, facial surgery, and hand surgery. Twenty-four separate articles described various methods of practicing microsurgical techniques on different types of animals. Fourteen different articles each described various methods of conducting flap-based procedures which consisted of either local or perforator flap dissection. Eight articles described different models for practicing hand surgery techniques. Finally, eight articles described animal models that were used for head and neck procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive summary of animal models related to plastic surgery training has been compiled. Cadaveric animal models provide a readily available introduction to many procedures and ought to be used instead of live models when feasible.

Basic Plastic Surgery Skills Training Program on Inanimate Bench Models during Medical Graduation

Due to ethical and medical-legal drawbacks, high costs, and difficulties of accessibility that are inherent to the practice of basic surgical skills on living patients, fresh human cadaver, and live animals, the search for alternative forms of training is needed. In this study, the teaching and learning process of basic surgical skills pertinent to plastic surgery during medical education on different inanimate bench models as a form of alternative and complementary training to the teaching programs already established is proposed.