Dorsally extended digital island flap for repairing soft tissue injury of the fingertip

The Efficacy of Antegrade Homodigital Neurovascular Island Flaps in Distal Fingertip Reconstruction: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Antegrade homodigital neurovascular island flaps (AHIFs) are a heterogeneous group of pedicled flaps used for reconstruction of traumatic digital detipping injuries. While numerous single-center studies have documented their use, there are no large or multicentre studies validating their efficacy, applicability, and functional outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the contemporary literature to establish the safety and functional outcomes of this technique.

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed using PubMED, Embase, and MEDLINE from inception date to October 2020, with further studies identified from study reference lists and independent searches. Relevant studies reported on complications and functional outcomes of the AHIFs, as used for digital detipping injuries. Data were then extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies published between 1974 and 2019 yielded 744 patients. Four studies provided incomplete epidemiologic data, resulting in a total of 559 patients with 584 digital injuries. Index and middle fingers were most frequently involved. Mean final 2-point discrimination (2-PD) was 4.9 mm static and 5.1 mm dynamic, with dynamic 2-PD reported in 2 studies. Mean total active motion of the digit was 200.3°. Mean time to return to work was 6.7 weeks in 10 studies. Flap survivorship was found to be 99.6% in 23 studies. Cold intolerance was the most common complication at 18%, followed by pain and hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade homodigital neurovascular island flaps provide a safe and effective method of treating distal finger amputations, yielding satisfactory functional outcomes across all ages. Further studies comparing outcomes between the AHIFs and other reconstructive modalities would be useful.

Potential of Tissue-Engineered and Artificial Dermis Grafts for Fingertip Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Management of skin and soft-tissue defects of the fingertips is functionally and aesthetically important, but controversial, especially when bones are exposed. Recent advances in wound healing technology allow the use of cells or biological dermis. The authors studied the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered dermis grafts and artificial dermis grafts versus immediate reconstructive procedures, such as the reverse digital artery island flap, in treating bone-exposed fingertip defects.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-two patients with bone-exposed fingertip defects treated with tissue-engineered dermis grafts (n = 71), artificial dermis grafts (n = 23), or reverse digital artery island flaps (n = 88) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical time, duration of hospitalization, total cost, success rate, healing time, sensory recovery, range of motion, scar quality, and patient satisfaction were compared.

RESULTS

No tissue-engineered or artificial dermis graft exhibited graft rejection or failure, whereas there was one partial loss and one total loss after reverse digital artery island flap surgery. Tissue-engineered dermis grafts were superior in scar quality, and artificial dermis grafts had shorter surgical times and lower surgical costs; both groups demonstrated superior results in postoperative range of motion and sensory recovery in two-point discrimination tests and shorter hospitalization, compared with the reverse digital artery island flap group. The reverse digital artery island flap had shorter complete closure time and less postoperative tingling sensation. There were no differences in overall patient satisfaction among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue-engineered and artificial dermis grafts may be promising alternatives for fingertip reconstruction. In particular, tissue-engineered dermis grafts may deliver superior functional results, including recovery of sensory discomfort and aesthetic results in terms of scar quality over artificial dermis grafts.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

A Review and Meta-analysis of Adverse Events Related to Local Flap Reconstruction for Digital Soft Tissue Defects

We reviewed the current literature to estimate incidence rates for adverse events with pedicled flaps in the hand. We identified 241 different studies reporting adverse events for 6693 flaps. The average incidence rate was 5.4% and total or partial loss of flap constituted 65% of all reported complications. Flaps with reverse or perforator-based flow may be more prone to vascular complications compared with flaps with antegrade flow or skin pedicle. The incidence rates were acceptable in all flaps (1%-10%) and thus the flap can be chosen primarily based on considerations other than risk of adverse events.

Modified anterograde pedicle advancement flap in fingertip injury

Soft tissue reconstruction is needed to maintain the maximum length of the fingers in fingertip injury. The purpose of this study was to present an anterograde pedicle advancement flap technique, for the treatment of fingertip injuries, which involved a modification to the anterograde advancement flap by the dissection of the digital nerve and artery with a pedicle to advance the flap. This technique was used in 12 fingers in patients who had undergone soft tissue reconstruction of fingertip injuries between January 2012 and October 2013. The sizes of the flaps ranged from 8 × 7 mm to 14 × 10 mm. The mean length of advancement was 9.7 mm (range 7-13). The mean value of the static two-point discrimination test of the healed flaps was 5.1 mm (range 4-6) and the flaps survived in all the 12 cases. The modified anterograde pedicle advancement flap provides a reliable coverage of sensate soft tissue without bone shortening in fingertip injuries.Level II.

Homodigital artery flap reconstruction for fingertip amputation: a comparative study of the oblique triangular neurovascular advancement flap and the reverse digital artery island flap

This fingertip reconstruction study retrospectively compared sensory recovery and active range of motion outcomes in neurovascular island advancement and reverse digital artery island flaps. Seventeen oblique triangular flaps and 14 reverse digital artery island flaps were performed for nail bed level fingertip amputations (Ishikawa subzone II). There was no significant difference between the two procedures in the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test and range of motion results. For static and moving two-point discrimination tests, however, those with a reverse digital artery island flap required a longer period for sensory recovery compared to those with an oblique triangular advancement flap. This trend equilibrated at 12 months after surgery showing no significant difference in both static and moving two-point discrimination tests between the procedures.