Superficial peroneal and sural nerve transfer to tibial nerve for restoration of plantar sensation after complex injuries of the tibial nerve: Cadaver feasibility study

Plasticity of the Central Nervous System Involving Peripheral Nerve Transfer

Peripheral nerve injury can lead to partial or complete loss of limb function, and nerve transfer is an effective surgical salvage for patients with these injuries. The inability of deprived cortical regions representing damaged nerves to overcome corresponding maladaptive plasticity after the reinnervation of muscle fibers and sensory receptors is thought to be correlated with lasting and unfavorable functional recovery. However, the concept of central nervous system plasticity is rarely elucidated in classical textbooks involving peripheral nerve injury, let alone peripheral nerve transfer. This article is aimed at providing a comprehensive understanding of central nervous system plasticity involving peripheral nerve injury by reviewing studies mainly in human or nonhuman primate and by highlighting the functional and structural modifications in the central nervous system after peripheral nerve transfer. Hopefully, it will help surgeons perform successful nerve transfer under the guidance of modern concepts in neuroplasticity.

Relationships of the superficial fibular nerve and sural nerve with respect to the lateral malleolus: implications for ankle surgeons

PURPOSE

Superficial fibular nerve (SFN) and sural nerve are at risk during osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus. The aim of this anatomical study was to describe the relationships of the superficial fibular and sural nerves with respect to the lateral malleolus.

METHODS

Nine corpses (18 ankles) were dissected, using a direct lateral approach. Measurements were recorded between the fibula and the nerves, and the pattern variations of the SFN were recorded for both right and left side to assess intra-individual variability.

RESULTS

Distance between the tip of the lateral malleolus and the piercing of fascia cruris was 111 ± 26 mm for type 1 pattern, and range was 46-161 mm all types included. 78% (14 SFN) were type 1 pattern, 17% (3 SFN) were type 2 pattern, and 5% (1 SFN) were type 3 pattern. 44% (4 specimen) had a type 1 pattern SFN on one ankle and another pattern on the other ankle. The sural nerve was always observed just posterior to the lateral malleolus.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a great inter-individual variability especially for the SFN, but also an intra-individual variability with frequent different patterns between right and left leg. It is important to know the anatomical variations of the SFN and sural nerve to decrease the risk of intra operative nerve injury during direct lateral approach of lateral malleolus.

Novel Uses of Nerve Transfers

Nerve transfer surgery involves using a working, functional nerve with an expendable or duplicated function as a donor to supply axons and restore function to an injured recipient nerve. Nerve transfers were originally popularized for the restoration of motor function in patients with peripheral nerve injuries. However, more recently, novel uses of nerve transfers have been described, including nerve transfers for sensory reinnervation, nerve transfers for spinal cord injury and stroke patients, supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers, and targeted muscle reinnervation for the prevention and treatment of postamputation neuroma pain. The uses for nerve transfers and the patient populations that can benefit from nerve transfer surgery continue to expand. Awareness about these novel uses of nerve transfers among the medical community is important in order to facilitate evaluation and treatment of these patients by peripheral nerve specialists. A lack of knowledge of these techniques continues to be a major barrier to more widespread implementation.