Ruskin JB, Shah HA, Congiusta DV, Ahmed IH, Vosbikian MM. Union of Radiocarpal Fusion With and Without Proximal Row Carpectomy: A Systematic Review.
J Hand Surg Am 2021;
46:200-208. [PMID:
33663695 DOI:
10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.019]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Wrist fusion provides a solution to the painful, arthritic wrist, and can be concomitantly performed with or without a proximal row carpectomy (PRC). The benefits of combining a PRC with fusion include a large amount of local bone graft for fusion and a lower number of joints needed to fuse. We hypothesized that wrist fusion combined with PRC will have a higher fusion rate than wrist fusion performed without PRC.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify all papers involving wrist arthrodesis using the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and COCHRANE. A literature search was performed using the phrases "wrist" OR "radiocarpal" and "fusion" OR "arthrodesis". Inclusion criteria included complete radiocarpal fusion performed for rheumatoid, posttraumatic, or primary arthritis; union rates available; English-language study. Studies were excluded if case reports; diagnoses other than the ones listed previously; inability to abstract the data. Data collected included wrist fusions with PRC or without PRC, union rate, patient age, underlying diagnosis, and method of fixation.
RESULTS
A total of 50 studies were included in the analysis. There were 41 studies with no PRC, 8 studies with PRC, and 1 study with and without PRC. There were 347 patients with a PRC and 339 patients had a successfully fused wrist (97.7%). There were 1,355 patients who had a wrist fusion with no PRC, and1,303 patients had successful wrist fusion (96.2%). The difference in fusion rate between the 2 groups, 97.7% versus 96.2%, was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
There is no statistically significant difference with regards to union rate in wrist fusion with a PRC versus wrist fusion without a PRC.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic IV.
Collapse