Comparison of reinnervation for preservation of denervated muscle volume with motor and sensory nerve: An experimental study

Animal models used to study direct peripheral nerve repair: a systematic review

Objective:

Peripheral nerve repair is required after traumatic injury. This common condition represents a major public health problem worldwide. Recovery after nerve repair depends on several factors, including the severity of the injury, the nerve involved, and the surgeon’s technical skills. Despite the precise microsurgical repair of nerve lesions, adequate functional recovery is not always achieved and, therefore, the regeneration process and surgical techniques are still being studied. Pre-clinical animal models are essential for this research and, for this reason, the focus of the present systematic review (according to the PRISMA statement) was to analyze the different animal models used in pre-clinical peripheral nerve repair studies.

Data sources:

Original articles, published in English from 2000 to 2018, were collected using the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases.

Data selection:

Only preclinical trials on direct nerve repair were included in this review. The articles were evaluated by the first two authors, in accordance with predefined data fields.

Outcome measures:

The primary outcomes included functional motor abilities, daily activity and regeneration rate. Secondary outcomes included coaptation technique and animal model.

Results:

This review yielded 267 articles, of which, after completion of the screening, 49 studies were analyzed. There were 1425 animals in those 49 studies, being rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, cats and dogs the different pre-clinical models. The nerves used were classified into three groups: head and neck (11), forelimb (8) and hindlimb (30). The techniques used to perform the coaptation were: microsuture (46), glue (12), laser (8) and mechanical (2). The follow-up examinations were histology (43), electrophysiological analysis (24) and behavioral observation (22).

Conclusion:

The most widely used animal model in the study of peripheral nerve repair is the rat. Other animal models are also used but the cost-benefit of the rat model provides several strengths over the others. Suture techniques are currently the first option for nerve repair, but the use of glues, lasers and bioengineering materials is increasing. Hence, further research in this field is required to improve clinical practice.

Molecular Mechanism of the "Babysitter" Procedure for Nerve Regeneration and Muscle Preservation in Peripheral Nerve Repair in a Rat Model

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the molecular mechanism of nerve "babysitter" for nerve regeneration and muscle preservation in peripheral nerve repair.

METHODS

Eighty rats were equalized into 4 groups: peroneal nerve transected, group A received no treatment; group B underwent end-to-end repair; group C underwent end-to-side "babysitter" with donor epineurial window; group D underwent end-to-side "babysitter" with 40% donor neurectomy. During second-stage procedure, end-to-end neurorrhaphies were executed in groups A, C, and D. Expression of Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 in spinal cord and IGF-1, TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), and Fn14 in anterior tibial muscles were evaluated by histopathology at 4-, 8-, 12-, and 24-week timepoints postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, group D expressed comparable IGF-1 with group B, and greater value than groups A and C in spinal cord. By 24 weeks, groups B and D showed higher values than groups A and C. Insulin-like growth factor 1 in muscles were greater in groups C and D than in groups A and B at 4 weeks, and comparable in all groups at 24 weeks. At 4 weeks, immunoreactive scores of TWEAK were 9.00 ± 0, 3.00 ± 0, 6.75 ± 0.75, and 6.75 ± 0.75, respectively. No differences were noticed in all groups by 24 weeks. At 4 weeks, Fn14 were similar in groups A, C, and D, but lower in group B. Group D showed comparable Fn14 with groups B and C, but lower value than group A at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

End-to-side nerve "babysitter" in peripheral nerve could promote fiber regeneration and muscle preservation by regulating expression of IGF-1 and TWEAK-Fn14. End-to-side "babysitter" with partial donor neurectomy could achieve comparable effects with end-to-end repair.

Motor Nerve Preservation and Muscle Atrophy After Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap Surgery for Oromandibular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The authors investigated the clinical and histopathologic significance of medial pectoral nerve preservation/reinnervation of pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap for oromandibular reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors compared 13 patients treated with pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap reconstruction and 6 control patients treated by rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction without motor nerve restoration. Subjective awareness was scored to evaluate changes in the facial contour due to muscle atrophy, and objective evaluation was performed in few patients. In addition, the authors performed histopathologic analysis of both muscle atrophy and nerve regeneration in 20 patients from whom samples were available.

RESULTS

Subjective awareness of changes in the facial contour induced by muscle atrophy was low among patients with nerve preservation/reinnervation, but there were objective changes at 3 months after surgery among patients who underwent nerve resection. In the patients who had medial pectoral nerve preservation or nerve restoration by nerve suture, favorable facial symmetry was retained at 5 years after surgery. Even though the motor nerve was preserved or restored, fatty degeneration and fibrosis were noted in approximately 30% of the total surface area of the muscle, and type I fibers had decreased to 36% that of control at 7 years after surgery. However, regressive changes were inhibited for 1 year after surgery; in contrast, changes corresponding to those noted at 7 years after surgery were observed by 3 months in the patients with nerve resection.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the authors showed that preservation or restoration of nerves can delay muscle and have highlighted the potential benefits of this approach.

Functional recovery after repair of peroneal nerve gap using different collagen conduits

BACKGROUND

Currently, autologous nerve implantation to bridge a long nerve gap presents the greatest regenerative performance in spite of substantial drawbacks. In this study, we evaluate the effect of two different collagen conduits bridging a peroneal nerve gap.

METHODS

Rats were divided into four groups: (1) the gold standard group, in which a 10-mm-long nerve segment was cut, reversed, and reimplanted between the nerve stumps; (2) the CG-I/III group, in which a type I/III collagen conduit bridged the gap; (3) the CG-I, in which a type I collagen conduit was grafted; and (4) the sham group, in which a surgery was performed without injuring the nerve. Peroneal Functional Index and kinematics analysis of locomotion were performed weekly during the 12 weeks post-surgery. At the end of the protocol, additional electrophysiological tests, muscular weight measurements, axon counting, and g-ratio analysis were carried out.

RESULTS

Functional loss followed by incomplete recovery was observed in animals grafted with collagen conduits. At 12 weeks post-surgery, the ventilatory rate of the CG-I group in response to exercise was similar to the sham group, contrary to the CG-I/III group. After KCl injections, an increase in metabosensitive afferent-fiber activity was recorded, but the response stayed incomplete for the collagen groups compared to the sham group. Furthermore, the CG-I group presented a higher number of axons and seemed to induce a greater axonal maturity compared to the CG-I/III group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the grafting of a type I collagen conduit may present slight better prospects than a type I/III collagen conduit.

Muscle reinnervation in one or two stages?: experimental study in rats with end-to-side nerve graft

PURPOSE: To compare muscle reinnervation in one and two surgical stages using end-to-side neurorrhaphy (ESN) without donor nerve injury. METHODS: The experiment was performed on four groups of 20 rats. Group 1 (G1), one stage, received the graft which was sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN, and its free stump was sutured end-to-end to the distal stump of the sectioned peroneal nerve (PN), all in the same operation. In Group 2 (G2), two stages, the nerve graft was sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN. Two months later the PN was sectioned and its distal stump connected to the distal stump of the graft as in G1. Normal control group (Gn) received the graft only sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN. Denervated control group (Gd), as well received the graft and had the PN sectioned and its two stumps buried in adjacent musculature, with the aim of denervating the cranial tibial muscle (CTM), the target of this study. The parameters used to evaluate CTM reinnervation were muscle mass, muscle fiber's minimum diameter and area. RESULTS: The mean CTM mass, the average of the muscular fibers areas and the average of the muscular fiber minimum diameters was higher (all p<0.0001) in G2 than in G1. Comparing the four groups, these parameters had their maximum expression in Gn and the minimum in Gd, as expected. CONCLUSION: The two stages showed better muscle reinnervation than one stage.