A study of the combination of triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil in modulating keloid fibroblasts in vitro

Comparing Combination Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Fluorouracil with Monotherapy Triamcinolone Acetonide or 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Keloids and hypertrophic scars cause physical and psychosocial problems. A combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) may enhance the treatment of pathologic scars, although the evidence base is limited. The authors compared the efficacy and complication rates of combination intralesional TAC and 5-FU with those of monotherapy intralesional TAC or 5-FU for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome was treatment efficacy (51% to 100% improvement). Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Of 277 articles screened, 13 studies were included, comprising 12 randomized control trials and one nonrandomized study. Six studies compared combination intralesional therapy versus monotherapy 5-FU, and nine studies compared combination intralesional therapy versus monotherapy TAC. The combined group demonstrated superior objective treatment efficacy compared with the monotherapy TAC group (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 2.22 to 5.35; I 2 = 0%; P < 0.00001) and monotherapy 5-FU group (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.21 to 7.87; I 2 = 0%; P < 0.0001). Telangiectasia was less frequent in combination therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.52; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.0003) compared with monotherapy TAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined intralesional TAC and 5-FU administration demonstrated superior treatment efficacy outcomes compared with monotherapy TAC or 5-FU. Patient-reported outcome measures should be incorporated in the design of future research to justify clinical recommendations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Combined TAC and 5-FU has demonstrated superior treatment efficacy outcomes compared to monotherapy TAC or 5-FU in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Keloids (KD) and hypertrophic scars (HTS), which are quite raised and pigmented and have increased vascularization and cellularity, are formed due to the impaired healing process of cutaneous injuries in some individuals having family history and genetic factors. These scars decrease the quality of life (QOL) of patients greatly, due to the pain, itching, contracture, cosmetic problems, and so on, depending on the location of the scars. Treatment/prevention that will satisfy patients' QOL is still under development. In this article, we review pharmacotherapy for treating KD and HTS, including the prevention of postsurgical recurrence (especially KD). Pharmacotherapy involves monotherapy using a single drug and combination pharmacotherapy using multiple drugs, where drugs are administered orally, topically and/or through intralesional injection. In addition, pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS is sometimes combined with surgical excision and/or with physical therapy such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy including brachytherapy, and silicone gel/sheeting. The results regarding the clinical effectiveness of each mono-pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS are not always consistent but rather scattered among researchers. Multimodal combination pharmacotherapy that targets multiple sites simultaneously is more effective than mono-pharmacotherapy. The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Online search engines.

Human In Vitro Skin Models for Wound Healing and Wound Healing Disorders

Skin wound healing is essential to health and survival. Consequently, high amounts of research effort have been put into investigating the cellular and molecular components involved in the wound healing process. The use of animal experiments has contributed greatly to the knowledge of wound healing, skin diseases, and the exploration of treatment options. However, in addition to ethical concerns, anatomical and physiological inter-species differences often influence the translatability of animal-based studies. Human in vitro skin models, which include essential cellular and structural components for wound healing analyses, would improve the translatability of results and reduce animal experiments during the preclinical evaluation of novel therapy approaches. In this review, we summarize in vitro approaches, which are used to study wound healing as well as wound healing-pathologies such as chronic wounds, keloids, and hypertrophic scars in a human setting.

Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: Advances in Treatment and Review of Established Therapies

Hypertrophic scars and keloids can have significant detrimental effects on patients both psychosocially and functionally. A careful identification of patient risk factors and a comprehensive management plan are necessary to optimize outcomes. Patients with a history of dystrophic scarring should avoid unnecessary procedures and enhance the wound-healing process using various preventive strategies. As there is no single, fully efficacious treatment modality, prevention remains the best approach in reducing aberrant scar formation. When prevention therapies fail, keloids have been shown to be respond to a variety of therapies including topical and injectable corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, radiotherapy, lasers, and surgical excision, all with varying efficacies. As such, management should be tailored to the individual patient's risk factors with the use of combination therapies to reduce recurrence rates. Still, keloid and hypertrophic scar therapies are widely diverse with novel treatment modalities providing alternatives for recurring lesions. Laser-assisted drug delivery, skin priming, and novel topical therapies may provide alternative options for the management of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Is the future scarless? - Fibroblasts as targets for scarless wound healing: a narrative review

Introduction: Scarless healing is the ideal outcome of wound healing and is exhibited in some species. This narrative review assembles the current understanding of fibroblast heterogenicity along with the latest fibroblast-related targets for scar reduction therapies. Human regenerative wound healing is deemed possible due to the wound regeneration already seen in the early gestation foetus. Methods: This literature narrative review was undertaken by searching PubMed and Web of Science databases and Google Scholar to find articles concerning the fibroblast involvement in wound healing. We evaluated and collated these articles to form a consensus of the current understanding of the field. Discussion: This article describes current understanding of fibroblast heterogenicity and involvement in wound healing, focusing on the role of fibroblasts during physiological scarring. We also present the current most promising targets involving fibroblasts in the reduction of scarring and how we can manipulate the behaviour of fibroblasts to mimic the wound regeneration models in the human foetus. These targets include the pro-fibrotic EN1 positive fibroblast lineage, TGFβ1 inhibition, and genetic therapies utilising miRNAs and siRNAs. Conclusion: No therapies are currently available to eradicate scarring; however, treatment options are available to reduce the appearance of scarring. Further research into the heterogenicity and interactions of fibroblasts in both the foetus and adult is needed, and this may lead to the development of novel treatments against scarring.

Quercetin synergistically potentiates the anti-metastatic effect of 5-fluorouracil on the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line

OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer (BC) cells' ability to metastasize to other tissues increases mortality. The Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 (MMP-2 and MMP-9) facilitate cancer cell migration. 5-fluorouracil is a frequently applied chemotherapeutic agent in cancer treatment with destructive side effects on normal tissues. Hence, researchers have focused on finding a way to reduce the dose of chemotherapeutic drugs. Quercetin, a natural polyphenolic compound, has inhibitory effects on proliferation and migration of tumor cells. This study evaluated the effect of the combination of Quercetin and 5-fluorouracil on migration of the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of Quercetin, 5-fluorouracil , and their combination on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell proliferation was investigated through MTT assay. Inhibition of tumor cell migration was examined by wound healing assay. Finally, the effect of treatments on gene expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 was evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR.

RESULTS

The IC50 values for Quercetin and 5-fluorouracil after 48 hr treatment were 295 μM and 525 μM, respectively. The combination index (CI) for Quercetin and 5-fluorouracil was <1, indicating synergy between them. The combination of Quercetin plus 5-fluorouracil resulted in a significant reduction in migration rate and MMP-2 and MMP-9 gene expressions of MDA-MB-231 cancer cells compared with the individual application of 5-FU.

CONCLUSION

Quercetin enhances the suppressory effect of 5-fluorouracil on migration of BC cells. The combination of Quercetin and 5-fluorouracil can be an attractive field for future studies.

Assessment of various intralesional injections in keloid: Comparative analysis

AIM

Intralesional triamcinolone is a gold standard in treating the keloids to comparation its effectiveness versus intralesional 5-fluorouracil intralesional verapamil and intralesional platelet-rich plasma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Several 160-cases were categorized into four groups of each Group-Containing 40 cases. Group-A (control) treated with intralesional triamcinolone and Group-B intralesional verapamil, Group-C intralesional 5-fluorouracil, and Group-D intralesional platelet-rich plasma. Patients were assessed for clinical response based on a decrease in the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) at baseline and the end of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean base-line POSAS score was 91 ± 10.98 SD check-in Group-A, 90 ± 10.85 in Group-B, 89 ± 10.06 in Group-C, and 92 ± 10.84 in Group-D.POSAS score after 24 weeks 36 ± 12.74 in Group-A, 29 ± 10.91 in Group-B, 39 ± 13.74 in Group-C, 36 ± 12.74 in Group-D. Statistically, a significant difference was observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Intralesional verapamil reported to be the most effective therapy and platelet-rich plasma was effective as intralesional triamcinolone acetonide with no serious side effects and 5-fluorouracil was less effective in treating the keloids.

5-Fluorouracil Management of Oculofacial Scars: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

To review the literature for the safety and efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the management of oculofacial scars.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in July 2019 in the PubMed database to identify reports of the use of 5-FU injections for modulating oculofacial cutaneous scars. The search yielded 152 articles, of which 15 met criteria outlined for assessment. Data were abstracted from these 15 relevant articles.

RESULTS

While there were no high-level prospective randomized controlled trials, 8 were lower-quality randomized controlled trial, 3 were retrospective cohort studies, and 4 were case series. Most studies pooled results of facial and nonfacial cutaneous applications. Three studies focused solely on oculofacial applications, and these were all lower-level evidence studies. The study outcomes included scar dimension reduction, erythema, patient satisfaction score, observer assessment of scar improvement, and recurrence rates. 5-Fluorouracil was administered as monotherapy or as part of multimodality treatment with other agents (usually corticosteroids) or with CO2 laser, radiotherapy, or pulsed dye laser. 5-Fluorouracil was usually given as an intralesional injection, but in some studies, it was applied topically after micropuncture of the skin. The number and timing of treatments varied between studies. Overall, the level of safety of 5-FU was high. Pain with injection was the most common reported side effect. Other common adverse side effects included pruritus, telangiectasias, changes in pigmentation, and purpura, and 2 studies noted more serious events, such as ulceration, superficial necrosis, and local infection. There were no severe side effects such as anaphylaxis, immune suppression, secondary malignancy, systemic infection, blindness, or death. In all studies, 5-FU was associated with prophylaxis of oculofacial scars or improvement of keloids or hypertrophic scars in terms of reducing size, erythema, and pruritus. 5-Fluorouracil application was associated with favorable patient satisfaction and observer assessment scores especially compared with corticosteroid injections alone.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality randomized controlled trials are currently lacking, and the existing literature is predominately not specific to use of 5-FU on the face. These studies, however, suggest that intralesional 5-FU is safe and probably more effective than other options in the management of cutaneous scars in the oculofacial region. The delivery methods, timing, dosing, and concomitant therapies were highly variable. Further high-quality controlled studies specific to oculofacial scars may be indicated to assess the efficacy of 5-FU and to establish the best protocols for administering this medication.

Bilayer dissolving microneedle array containing 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone with biphasic release profile for hypertrophic scar therapy

Hypertrophic scar (HS) is an undesirable skin abnormality following deep burns or operations. Although intralesional multi-injection with the suspension of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) has exhibited great promise to HS treatment in clinical, the difference of metabolic behavior between TA and 5-Fu remarkably compromised the treatment efficacy. Besides, the traditional injection with great pain is highly dependent on the skill of the experts, which results in poor compliance. Herein, a bilayer dissolving microneedle (BMN) containing TA and 5-Fu (TA-5-Fu-BMN) with biphasic release profile was designed for HS therapy. Equipped with several micro-scale needle tips, the BMN could be self-pressed into the HS with uniform drug distribution and less pain. Both in vitro permeation and in vivo HS retention tests revealed that TA and 5-Fu could coexist in the scar tissue for a sufficient time period due to the well-designed biphasic release property. Subsequently, the rabbit ear HS model was established to assess therapeutic efficacy. The histological analysis showed that TA-5-Fu-BMN could significantly reduce abnormal fibroblast proliferation and collagen fiber deposition. It was also found that the value of scar elevation index was ameliorated to a basal level, together with the downregulation of mRNA and protein expression of Collagen I (Col I) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) after application of TA-5-Fu-BMN. In conclusion, the BMN with biphasic release profiles could serve as a potential strategy for HS treatment providing both convenient administrations as well as controlled drug release behavior.

•

A bilayer microneedle co-delivery system was designed for hypertrophic scar therapy.

•

The system contained rapid release triamcinolone and sustained-release 5- Fluorouracil.

•

The system was constructed to control the intralesional retention of different drugs.

•

The co-delivery system showed a superior therapeutic effect in hypertrophic scar.

Botulinum toxin type A versus 5-Fluorouracil in treatment of keloid

Most therapeutic approaches for keloids remain clinically unsatisfactory. In the last years, intralesional botulinum toxin-A (IL BTX-A) was proposed for treatment of keloids. Our aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of IL BTX-A and IL 5-Fluorouracil (IL 5-FU) in treatment of keloids. A total of 50 patients with keloids were included in the study, 22 patients (with 26 keloids) were treated with IL BTX-A monthly for up to 6 months and other 22 patients (with 27 keloids) were treated with IL 5-FU weekly for up to 6 weeks, while the remaining 6 patients, each having multiple keloids, were treated with both IL BTX-A for some lesions (8 keloids) and IL 5-FU for their remaining lesions (8 keloids). The clinical improvement was assessed according to flattening of the lesions. Side effects were recorded. A significantly better therapeutic response of keloids was detected after IL BTX-A than IL 5-FU (P = 0.041). IL BTX-A achieved excellent and good flattening of the lesions (58.8% and 20.6%) compared to (31.4% and 17.1%) after IL 5-FU, respectively. In BTX-A treated group, there was no statistically significant difference between the clinical response in small lesions compared to medium and large ones (P = 0.476). While in 5-FU treated group, small and medium lesions showed significantly better response than larger ones (P = 0.009). IL BTX-A caused fewer side effects than IL 5-FU, less pain, itching, no hyperpigmentation and less recurrence. Both IL BTX-A and IL 5-FU showed positive results in treatment of keloids. However, IL BTX-A showed higher clinical efficacy even in large size keloids with less side effects.

Evidence-based therapy in hypertrophic scars: An update of a systematic review

Hypertrophic scars are still a major burden for numerous patients, especially after burns. Many treatment options are available; however, no evidence-based treatment protocol is available with recommendations mostly emerging from experience or lower quality studies. This review serves to discuss the currently available literature. A systematic review was performed and the databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for suitable publications. Only original articles in English that dealt with the treatment of hypertrophic scars in living humans were analyzed. Further, studies with a level of evidence lower than 1 as defined by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons were excluded. After duplicate exclusion, 1638 studies were screened. A qualitative assessment yielded 163 articles eligible for evidence grading. Finally nine studies were included. Four of them used intralesional injections, four topical therapeutics and one assessed the efficacy of CO₂ -laser. Intralesional triamcinolone + fluorouracil injections, and topical pressure and/or silicone therapy revealed significant improvements in terms of scar height, pliability, and pigmentation. This systematic review showed that still few high-quality studies exist to evaluate therapeutic means and their mechanisms for hypertrophic scars. Among these, most of them assessed the efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone injections with the same treatment protocol. Intralesional injection appears to be the best option for hypertrophic scar treatment. Future studies should focus on a possible optimization of infiltrative therapies, consistent end-point evaluations, adequate follow-up periods, and possibly intraindividual treatments.

Topical delivery of 5-fluorouracil-loaded carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles using microneedles for keloid treatment

Keloids are induced by skin injuries such as surgeries, skin piercings, burns, and trauma. The intra-lesional injection of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a promising therapy to treat keloid. However, local 5-FU injections have caused several side effects such as pain at administration and hyperpigmentation. This study suggests a safer and more effective 5-FU delivery system. We used microneedles to treat keloid because this method has the feasibility of self-administration without pain. In this study, 5-FU-loaded carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) nanoparticles were prepared and characterized by various analytical methods and then coated on stainless solid microneedles. The blank CMC nanoparticles caused an increase in cell viability on human normal fibroblasts to 150%. In particular, the 5-FU-loaded CMC nanoparticles showed a significant inhibitory effect on the human keloid fibroblast to 16%. The intercellular uptake of the 5-FU-loaded CMC nanoparticles was observed on both human normal and keloid fibroblasts by using a confocal microscope. In addition, it was found that the nanoparticles showed an inhibition of TGF-β1 by ELISA. For topical drug delivery, it was confirmed that the nanoparticles coated onto the microneedles were dissolved and diffused at the administration site in the porcine dorsal skin model. According to these results, the suggested microneedle-mediated drug delivery system not only inhibits the human keloid fibroblasts by delivering drugs effectively into the keloids but also has the feasibility to self-administer without pain. Therefore, this new system including 5-FU-loaded CMC nanoparticles and microneedles has the potential to treat keloid scars. Graphical abstract.

Treatment of keloids using 5-fluorouracil in combination with crystalline triamcinolone acetonide suspension: evaluating therapeutic effects by using non-invasive objective measures

BACKGROUND

Intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) has been recommended as a promising alternative for keloids not responding to silicone-based products, cryotherapy or intralesional corticosteroids alone. Although numerous studies support the efficacy of this regime, there is a lack of objective data.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluate the therapeutic effect of four courses of intralesional 5-FU in combination with TAC (3 : 1) utilizing 3D analysis (PRIMOS^®pico ), ultrasound and scar scales such as the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales (POSAS) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with keloids were treated using 5-FU and TAC every 4 weeks. Objective assessments were performed and the scar scales administered at baseline, as well as during consecutive visits at 1- and 12-month follow-up (FU). Routine laboratory tests were performed at baseline and at 1-month FU.

RESULTS

3D PRIMOS and ultrasound measurements revealed highly significant and stable reductions in height (baseline mean score: 4.0 ± 1.7 mm, 1-month FU mean score: 1.5 ± 0.8 mm, 12-month FU mean score: 1.8 ± 0.9 mm, P = <0.0001), volume (baseline mean score: 1,105 ± 911.5 mm³ , 1-month FU mean score: 416.1 ± 218.1 mm³ , 12-month FU mean sore: 431.2 ± 253.6 mm³ , P = <0.0001, respectively) and penetration depth of keloids (relative reduction between baseline and 12-month FU of 74.4%, P = <0.0001). The POSAS and DLQI scales confirmed significant objective and subjective improvements in scar appearance in all categories. The life quality associated with keloid appearance improved from a 'moderate effect' to a 'small effect' throughout the course of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study confirm the efficacy and safety of the combination of 5-FU and TAC in keloids. Treatments were well tolerated and demonstrated stable results at 12-month FU.

In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models for Functional Testing of Therapeutic Anti-scarring Drug Targets in Keloids

Significance: Keloids are benign fibro-proliferative raised dermal lesions that spread beyond the original borders of the wound, continue to grow, rarely regress, and are the most common in pigmented individuals after an abnormal wound healing response. The current treatment failure and respective challenges involved highlighting the underlying issue that the etiopathogenesis of keloids is still not well understood. Disease models are required to better understand the disease pathogenesis. It is not possible to establish keloids in animals because of the uniqueness of this disease to human skin. To address this challenge, along these lines, non-animal reproducible models are vital in investigating molecular mechanisms of keloid pathogenesis and therapeutics development. Recent Advances: Various non-animal models have been developed to better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in keloid scarring and aid in identifying and evaluating the therapeutic potential of novel drug candidates. In this scenario, the current review aims at describing in vitro monocultures, co-cultures, organotypic cultures, and ex vivo whole skin keloid tissue organ culture models. Critical Issues and Future Directions: Current treatment options for keloids are far from securing a cure or preventing disease recurrence. Identifying universally accepted effective therapy for keloids has been hampered by the absence of appropriate disease model systems. Animal models do not accurately mimic the disease, thus non-animal model systems are pivotal in keloid research. The use of these models is essential not only for a better understanding of disease biology but also for identifying and evaluating novel drug targets.

Current and upcoming therapies to modulate skin scarring and fibrosis

Skin is the largest organ of the human body. Being the interface between the body and the outer environment, makes it susceptible to physical injury. To maintain life, nature has endowed skin with a fast healing response that invariably ends in the formation of scar at the wounded dermal area. In many cases, skin remodelling may be impaired, leading to local hypertrophic scars or keloids. One should also consider that the scarring process is part of the wound healing response, which always starts with inflammation. Thus, scarring can also be induced in the dermis, in the absence of an actual wound, during chronic inflammatory processes. Considering the significant portion of the population that is subject to abnormal scarring, this review critically discusses the state-of-the-art and upcoming therapies in skin scarring and fibrosis.

Normal and keloid fibroblasts are differentially influenced by IFN-γ and triamcinolone as well as by their combination

Impaired wound healing as well as imbalanced cell proliferation and extracellular matrix synthesis and degeneration can cause aberrant scarring. The most severe impacts of such scarring on patients' lives are stigmatization and physical restriction. Although, a broad variety of combinatorial approaches with, e.g., glucocorticoids, chemotherapeutics, and immunomodulators are used, there is still a high recurrence rate of keloids. The aim of this study was to investigate which influence interferon γ (IFN-γ, 1.000-10.000 IU/mL) and/or triamcinolone acetonide (TA, 1 μg/mL) have on proliferation, cell viability, collagen type I synthesis, and cytokine secretion in healthy and keloid fibroblasts. It was shown that mono-treatment with IFN-γ or TA for 2 days induced a severe reduction of the proliferative potential in both cell species. The combinatory treatment (IFN-γ plus TA) of keloid fibroblasts enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of the mono-treatments, whereas no additional anti-proliferative effect was observed in normal fibroblasts. Furthermore, we observed that the combinatory treatment regimen reduced the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), an actin isotype contributing to cell-generated mechanical tension, in keloid fibroblasts. In normal fibroblasts, α-SMA was reduced by the mono-treatment with IFN-γ as well as by the combinatory treatment. The analysis of collagen-type I synthesis revealed that TA did not reduce collagen type I synthesis in normal fibroblasts but in keloid fibroblasts. IFN-γ reduced in both cell species the collagen type I synthesis. The combination of TA and IFN-γ intensified the previously observed collagen type I synthesis reduction in keloid fibroblasts. The herein presented data suggest the combinatory application of IFN-γ and TA as a promising therapy concept for keloids.

Multi-dimensional models for functional testing of keloid scars: In silico, in vitro, organoid, organotypic, ex vivo organ culture, and in vivo models

Keloid scars are described as benign fibro-proliferative dermal outgrowths that commonly occur in pigmented skin post cutaneous injury, and continue to grow beyond the boundary of the original wound margin. There is a lack of thorough understanding of keloid pathogenesis and thus keloid therapeutic options remain ill-defined. In view of the poor response to current therapy and high recurrence rates, there is an unmet need in improving our knowledge and therefore in identifying targeted and effective treatment strategies in management of keloids. Keloid research however, is hampered by a lack of relevant animal models as keloids do not spontaneously occur in animals and are unique to human skin. Therefore, developing novel animal models and nonanimal models for functional evaluation of keloid cells and tissue for better understanding their pathobiology and response to putative candidate therapies are essential. Here, we present the key concepts and relevant emerging research on two-dimensional and three-dimensional cell and tissue models for functional testing of keloid scars. We will describe in detail current models including in vitro mono- and co-cultures, multi-cellular spheroids (organoids) and organotyopic cultures, ex vivo whole skin keloid tissue organ culture models as well as in vivo human patient models. Finally, we discuss the role played by time as the fourth dimension in a novel model that involves sequential temporal biopsies of human patients with keloids (a so called 4D in vivo human model). The use of these unique models will no doubt prove pivotal in identification of new drug targets as well as biomarkers, in functional testing of emerging novel therapeutics, and in enhancing our understanding of keloid disease biology.

The efficacy of excision followed by intralesional 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone acetonide versus excision followed by radiotherapy in the treatment of ear keloids: A randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

The ear is the common site for keloid formation especially in women after ear piercing. Surgery is the main stay of treatment in these lesions but there are large numbers of treatment failures in surgery alone.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of post-excision intralesional 5-fluorouracil/triamcinolone acetonide (5-FU/TAC) and post-excision radiotherapy in the treatment of ear keloids.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted from May 2014 to January 2015 at Jinnah Burn and Reconstructive Surgery Centre, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore.

SUBJECT & METHODOLOGY

After approval from the hospital ethical committee, 60 patients presented in the outpatient department fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected and randomly assigned in two groups with the help of the random number table. Patients in group A had excision followed by intralesional 5-FU/TAC injections while patients of group B had excision followed by radiotherapy. Patients were assessed at 6 months after completion of treatment for efficacy (no recurrence within 6 months of treatment).

RESULTS

In our study total of 60 patients completed the study, with 30 patients in each group. 7 patients (23.34%) in Group-A and 9 patients (30%) in Group-B were males while 23 patients (76.67%) in Group-A and 21 patients (70%) in Group-B were females i.e. male to female ratio is 1:2.75. Mean age was 31.8+6.48years. The comparison of frequency of efficacy in both groups showed that 73.33% (n=22) in Group-A and 43.33% (n=13) in Group-B had efficacy, p value was calculated as 0.01, showing a significant statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

Excision and intralesional 5-FU/TAC is an effective treatment for keloids on the ears.

Pathophysiologic Mechanisms and Current Treatments for Cutaneous Sequelae of Burn Wounds

Burn injuries are a pervasive clinical problem. Extensive thermal trauma can be life-threatening or result in long-lasting complications, generating a significant impact on quality of life for patients as well as a cost burden to the healthcare system. The importance of addressing global or systemic issues such as resuscitation and management of inhalation injuries is not disputed but is beyond the scope of this review, which focuses on cutaneous pathophysiologic mechanisms for current treatments, both in the acute and long-term settings. Pathophysiological mechanisms of burn progression and wound healing are mediated by highly complex cascades of cellular and biochemical events, which become dysregulated in slow-healing wounds such as burns. Burns can result in fibroproliferative scarring, skin contractures, or chronic wounds that take weeks or months to heal. Burn injuries are highly individualized owing to wound-specific differences such as burn depth and surface area, in addition to patient-specific factors including genetics, immune competency, and age. Other extrinsic complications such as microbial infection can complicate wound healing, resulting in prolonged inflammation and delayed re-epithelialization. Although mortality is decreasing with advancements in burn care, morbidity from postburn deformities continues to be a challenge. Optimizing specialized acute care and late burn outcome intervention on a patient-by-patient basis is critical for successful management of burn wounds and the associated pathological scar outcome. Understanding the fundamentals of integument physiology and the cellular processes involved in wound healing is essential for designing effective treatment strategies for burn wound care as well as development of future therapies. Published 2018. Compr Physiol 8:371-405, 2018.

Comparison of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide, 5-Fluorouracil, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Keloids

Objective: Despite the myriad options available, there is no universally accepted treatment for keloids. Our objective was to compare three regimens and establish superiority in terms of objective and subjective outcomes. Approach: In this randomized parallel group study, 60 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to three groups. Patients received intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in Group TAC, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in Group 5FU, and a combination in Group T + F every 3 weeks till 24 weeks or till the keloid resolved. Results: There was a reduction in all parameters at every successive assessment in all three groups. Improvement in terms of height, vascularity, and pliability was fastest with 5FU, TAC, and T + F group, respectively, which was statistically significant. Decrease in pigmentation was significantly faster with T+F. Reduction in pruritus, however, was significantly faster with 5FU than the other groups, but the difference in reduction of pain among the three groups was not significant. Telangiectasias and skin atrophy were seen most commonly in TAC group, while skin ulceration was a common problem in 5FU group. Conclusion: TAC, 5FU, and their combination are all effective in keloid scars. A combination of TAC +5FU seems to offer the balanced benefit of faster and more efficacious response with lesser adverse effects when compared to individual drugs.

An Aesthetic Orbicularis Oculi Myectomy Technique for Blepharospasm: Use of Topical 5-Fluorouracil and Fibrin Sealant

PURPOSE

To describe a modified technique of orbicularis oculi myectomy for refractory blepharospasm. This technique includes removal of orbicularis muscle, reformation of the eyelid crease and pretarsal platform using fibrin sealant (Tisseel), and topical 5-fluorouracil to reduce scar formation and improve aesthetic outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 7 patients who underwent bilateral orbicularis oculi myectomy with our technique from 2013 to 2016. Outcome measures were postoperative botulinum toxin dose, frequency, duration between treatments, the amount of lagophthalmos, severity of dry eye, and patient satisfaction with aesthetic and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent the aesthetic myectomy technique had significantly decreased botulinum toxin use with relief of symptoms postoperatively. Only 1 of 7 patients experienced mild dry eye symptoms postoperatively, managed with artificial tears. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The aesthetic myectomy technique provides effective treatment for blepharospasm with good functional and aesthetic outcome.

Current Therapeutic Approach to Hypertrophic Scars

Abnormal scarring and its accompanying esthetic, functional, and psychological sequelae still pose significant challe nges. To date, there is no satisfactory prevention or treatment option for hypertrophic scars (HSs), which is mostly due to not completely comprehending the mechanisms underlying their formation. That is why the apprehension of regular and controlled physiological processes of scar formation is of utmost importance when facing hypertrophic scarring, its pathophysiology, prevention, and therapeutic approach. When treating HSs and choosing the best treatment and prevention modality, physicians can choose from a plethora of therapeutic options and many commercially available products, among which currently there is no efficient option that can successfully overcome impaired skin healing. This article reviews current therapeutic approach and emerging therapeutic strategies for the management of HSs, which should be individualized, based on an evaluation of the scar itself, patients’ expectations, and practical, evidence-based guidelines. Clinicians are encouraged to combine various prevention and treatment modalities where combination therapy that includes steroid injections, 5-fluorouracil, and pulsed-dye laser seems to be the most effective. On the other hand, the current therapeutic options are usually empirical and their results are unreliable and unpredictable. Therefore, there is an unmet need for an effective, targeted therapy and prevention, which would be based on an action or a modulation of a particular factor with clarified mechanism of action that has a beneficial effect on wound healing. As the extracellular matrix has a crucial role in cellular and extracellular events that lead to pathological scarring, targeting its components mostly by regulating bone morphogenetic proteins may throw up new therapeutic approach for reduction or prevention of HSs with functionally and cosmetically acceptable outcome.

Combined effects of long-pulsed neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser, diprospan and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of keloid scars

Keloids are benign tumors that originate from scar tissues, but they usually overgrow beyond the original wounds. In a three-month single-center clinical trial, 69 patients were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in group 1 were treated with intralesional injection of diprospan (2 mg betamethasone disodium phosphate and 5 mg betamethasone dipropionate in 1 ml) with one-month intervals for three months. Patients in groups 2 and 3 were injected with a combination of 0.5 ml 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 25 mg/ml) and diprospan as above for three months also. Prior to each injection, the keloids of patients in group 3 were additionally irradiated by a 1,064-nm neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser with a single pulse at an energy density of 90-100 J/cm² and a pulse width of 12 msec. Clinical responses were evaluated by patient self-assessment and overall assessment by an observer according to the clinical signs of erythema, pruritus and pliability. A total of sixty-two patients completed the tests of the present study. At 2 and 3 months, the patients in all treatment groups showed an acceptable improvement in nearly all measurements. At the end of the study, the erythema and toughness score was significantly reduced and itch reduction was significantly greater in the diprospan + 5-FU + Nd:YAG group when compared to those in the other groups (P<0.05 for all indexes). The acceptable responses (good to excellent improvements) reported by blinded observers were as follows: 12% in the diprospan group, 48% in the diprospan + 5-FU group and 69% in the diprospan + 5-FU + Nd:YAG group. All of the results indicated that the combination of diprospan + 5-FU + Nd:YAG was the most efficacious therapy for keloid scars.

Lasers and ancillary treatments for scar management Part 2: Keloid, hypertrophic, pigmented and acne scars

The formation of a wide range of excessive scars following various skin injuries is a natural consequence of healing. Scars resulting from surgery or trauma affect approximately 100 million people per annum in the developed world and can have profound physical, aesthetic, psychological and social consequences. Thus, scar treatment is a priority for patient and physician alike. Laser treatment plays an important role in scar management with additional support from ancillary modalities. Subsequent to part 1: Burns scars, part 2 focuses on our strategies and literature review of treatment of keloid, hypertrophic, pigmented and acne scars where lasers are used in conjunction with other measures, and illustrated with case studies.

Efficacy and safety of triamcinolone acetonide alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pathological scars, such as keloids and hypertrophic scars, readily cause physical and psychological problems. Combination 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) is presumed to enhance the treatment of pathological scars, although supportive evidence is lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TAC alone and in combination with 5-FU for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Five databases (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane databases, Embase and CNKI) were searched with the limitations of human subjects and English-language text. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The control group received intralesional TAC alone, and the experimental group received TAC combined with 5-FU injection. A pooled analysis of the effectiveness based on patient self-assessment after treatment showed that the experimental group achieved better results than the control group (OR = 2·92, 95% CI = 1·63-5·22, P = 0·0003). Similarly, a pooled analysis of the effectiveness based on observer assessment following treatment produced the same conclusion (OR = 4·03, 95% CI = 1·40-11·61, P = 0·010). A meta-analysis of scar height after treatment showed that the experimental group performed better than the control group (MD = -0·14, 95% CI = -0·23-0·05, P = 0·002). The erythema score of the experimental group after treatment was superior (MD = -0·20, 95% CI = -0·34-0·06, P = 0·004). The heterogeneity test showed no heterogeneity among the studies (P > 0·1, I²  = 0%). TAC combined with 5-FU is more suitable for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids, with greater improvement in scar height and patient satisfaction as well as fewer side effects.

A thermosensitive hydroxybutyl chitosan hydrogel as a potential co-delivery matrix for drugs on keloid inhibition

A thermosensitive hydroxybutyl chitosan hydrogel could be used as a potential co-delivery matrix for drugs on keloid inhibition.