Avoiding pitfalls in open augmentation rhinoplasty with autologous L-shaped costal cartilage strut grafts for saddle nose collapse due to autoimmune disease: the Cambridge experience

Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Wegener's Granulomatosis) Nasal Reconstruction: Improved Outcomes With No Delay

BACKGROUND

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's granulomatosis) causes progressive nasal collapse, nasal obstruction, and central face deformity. It is not known whether cartilaginous nasal reconstruction should be performed immediately or delayed until after disease "burnout."

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this research regarding nasal collapse due to Wegener's granulomatosis were to (1) assess the functional and aesthetic outcomes following immediate vs delayed nasal reconstruction; and (2) measure the impact of psychosocial well-being (anxiety, depression, social isolation) in immediate vs delayed nasal reconstruction.

METHODS

Wegener's patients with either immediate or delayed nasal surgery (n = 61) were compared. Functional and aesthetic severity were compared with the validated Standard Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcome Survey (SCHNOS) score (t test). In addition, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) perioperative and 1-year follow-up surveys were analyzed.

RESULTS

At initial consultation, SCHNOS score severity types were similar for both groups (immediate vs delayed): mild 15% vs 15%; moderate 59% vs 60%, and severe 26% vs 25%. Over a 30 ± 4 month period, delayed surgery patients' conditions deteriorated, with a shift from mild to more severe SCHNOS scores, from 25% severe at initial consultation to 85% before surgery. PROMIS scores at presentation were high compared to the general public; by the time of delayed surgery, patients had significantly worsened: anxiety from 28 to 73; depression from 18 to 62; and social isolation from 20 to 80. Although both immediate and delayed groups improved after surgery in functional and psychosocial scores, the immediate surgery group's improvement was superior.

CONCLUSIONS

Data showed superior functional and aesthetic scores and superior psychosocial indicators with immediate cartilaginous nasal reconstruction, compared with waiting until disease burnout to undergo surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Rhinoplasty for Sinonasal Deformities in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a vasculitis that affects respiratory and kidney vessels. It primarily involves the nose and sinuses but can progress systemically. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis causes severe nasal deformities, impacting aesthetics and breathing. Literature focuses on rhinoplasty for saddle nose deformities in non-GPA patients, but its suitability for GPA patients remains uncertain.

AIM

Our study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of rhinoplasty in GPA patients by analyzing the existing literature.

METHODS

Four databases were searched; 2 reviewers independently screened the retrieved references, then relevant data for our study were extracted. Categorical outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportions and 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics χ 2 test with a P -value lower than 0.1 indicating heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we incorporated 16 studies encompassing 136 patients who underwent nasal reconstruction as part of their treatment for GPA. The collective findings indicate a favorable success rate for rhinoplasty, with a pooled ratio of 89% (95% CI: 84%, 95%). The rate of revision surgeries was relatively low, with a pooled rate of 19% (95% CI: 12%, 26%). Furthermore, rhinoplasty demonstrated comparatively lower rates of recurrence (pooled rate: 22%, 95% CI: 3%, 42%) and complications (pooled rate: 12%, 95% CI: 7%, 18%).

CONCLUSION

Rhinoplasty benefits GPA patients with saddle nose deformity and septal perforation with high success rates and low recurrence, revision, and complication outcomes. However, more research is needed for validation and refinement.

Nasal Reconstruction in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Two Decade Review

Background: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) leads to progressive destruction of the nasal tissues resulting varying degrees of saddle deformity and nasal obstruction. Reconstructive techniques are numerous, but there are no large series reporting their results. Objective: This study sought to measure complications and outcomes after rhinoplasty for GPA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 42 patients with GPA who underwent nasal reconstruction of saddle nose deformity between 2005 and 2019 using primarily costal cartilage and soft tissue grafts. Results: Thirty-six patients met the criteria for inclusion. All were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Six patients required revision surgery due to infection or GPA flare ups. Five patients had complications. All patients were given a questionnaire at 12 months to rate their degree of satisfaction with their appearance and breathing. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the use of strong cartilage grafts and the timing of surgery result in improvement in breathing and appearance after rhinoplasty in patients with GPA. Clinical Trial Registration number: REB # 21-125.

The Need for Innovation in Rhinoplasty

Rhinoplasty is a challenging surgery and results are not always perfect. There are many obstacles to achieving optimal results. Among these are inadequate instrumentation, the unpredictability of healing, imprecise planning, and many more. Furthermore, selecting patients who can most benefit from surgery is equally important. In this article, some of the more pressing areas of rhinoplasty that need innovation are discussed. From proper patient selection, to advances in education, to the standardization of training programs, to the development of sophisticated implants, the future of rhinoplasty surgery lies in continued creativity and innovation.

Dorsocaudal reconstruction of previous caudal septal resections with partial split spreader graft

Background/Aim: Nasal obstruction is caused mainly by nasal septal deviation, and submucosal resection is usually performed to treat this problem. However, if over-resected, nasal tip deprojection, deprojection of the dorsum, or pseudo-hump formation may be seen. Spreader grafts are used to restore the nasal septum in these cases, and different techniques have been described for this restoration; however, these techniques may not be the best fit for such restoration. This study presents a novel and effective method for septal reconstruction in patients with previous septal resections. Methods: Between March 2012 and October 2014, a case series of 14 male patients with tip deprojection and pseudo-hump formation who had undergone corrective surgery in our clinic was retrospectively examined. Partial-split, caudal extension costal spreader grafts were used and were fixed to the dorsum of the remnant septum cranially to prevent warping while avoiding nasal dorsum widening. Pre- and post-operative comparisons were performed, and the Nasal Obstructive Symptoms Evaluation questionnaire for the functional results and subjective Esthetic Appearance test for the esthetic outcomes were administered. Results: The mean age was 36.8 years (19–56 years), and the mean follow-up time was 14.6 months. Functional outcomes and esthetic appearance led to significantly improvements in all post-operative categories (P < 0.05) without any major complications. Common complaints were usually the same as seen in conventional rhinoplasty procedures, such as facial swelling, nasal stuffiness, pain, and/or epistaxis. None of the patients requested revision surgery. Conclusion: Using partial-split, caudal extension costal spreader grafts in the reconstruction of dorsocaudal septum in patients with previous septal resections appears to provide favorable functional and esthetic results.

Reconstruction of a Severely Damaged Cartilaginous Septum with a Bypass L-Strut Graft using Costal Cartilage

OBJECTIVE

 Reconstruction of a weakened septal cartilage is a key procedure for the correction of deformed noses. However, when septal mucoperichondrium dissection is technically challenging, reconstruction of the lower two-thirds of the nose should be performed bypassing the damaged septal cartilage and mucosa. This article summarizes our experience with treating patients with severely damaged septal cartilage with bypass L-strut graft using costal cartilage.

METHODS

 We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients who underwent rhinoplasty using bypass L-strut graft. Autologous costal cartilage was used for creating L-strut in two different ways: (1) by fashioning the L-shaped graft as one unit using the sixth rib cartilage and (2) by integrating a dorsal strut with a columellar strut using slices of the seventh rib cartilage. The caudal strut is fixated to the anterior nasal spine; the dorsal L-strut is placed on the nasal dorsum with no fixation to the nasal bone. Medical records were assessed for demographic, clinical, and treatment information.

RESULTS

 One-piece-type L-strut graft was used for 11 patients and integrated-type L-strut graft was used for 15 patients. No statistical differences were found in postoperative aesthetic outcomes between the two groups. The postoperative assessment of surgical outcomes was excellent in 10 patients, good in 10, fair in 6, and poor in none. Functionally, all 26 patients experienced improvements in nasal breathing.

CONCLUSION

 Bypass L-strut graft using costal cartilage is a useful surgical maneuver of septal reconstruction in particular nasal deformity when the creation of the septal mucoperichondrial pocket is difficult or better to be avoided.

Review of literature of saddle nose deformity reconstruction and presentation of vomer onlay graft

OBJECTIVE

Saddle nose deformity is a well-described condition that most commonly results from trauma or prior surgery. For larger saddle nose deformity defects, bone grafts are a reconstructive option that provide adequate structure for repair. One new technique for repair of these deformities is a vomerian bone onlay graft. We aim to provide a review of literature on autogenous repair of saddle nose deformities, as well as introduce a new technique in which the vomer bone is used as an onlay bone graft.

METHODS

Literature review and case series. Five cases in which vomer onlay grafts were used for repair of saddle nose deformity were reviewed between January 2013 and December 2015. Aesthetic outcomes and postoperative complications were evaluated at subsequent follow-up visits in clinic.

RESULTS

In all cases where vomer bone was harvested, the vomer onlay graft provided adequate structure to traverse the saddle nose deformity. No postoperative complications were observed in an 18 month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Vomerian bone onlay grafts are a reconstructive option for saddle nose deformity and nasal dorsum defects. While septal cartilage is commonly used, and ethmoidal bone has been previously described as an option for composite graft reconstruction, vomer bone onlay grafting has not been well described in the literature. This method may be of use when previous nasal surgery has been performed and standard septal cartilage is not possible to harvest. The aesthetic outcomes following nasal dorsum reconstruction using onlay grafts are favorable, but long-term outcomes of these grafts require further study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The role of surgery in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitides affecting the nose and sinuses: A systematic review

Background:

The ear, nose and throat region has been reported to be one of the commonest sites involved in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis diseases and often precedes the diagnosis of ANCA–associated vasculitis by many months. Although treatment for ANCA–associated vasculitis primarily requires systemic immunosuppressive therapy, there are specific indications for sinonasal surgery during the course of the disease process. The three major roles for surgery in sinonasal vasculitis are to aid diagnosis through biopsy, enable symptom relief and nasal reconstructive surgery consideration when in remission.

Purpose:

The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the surgical procedures which can be performed in patients with ANCA–associated vasculitis presenting with sinonasal involvement.

Materials and methods:

A systematic literature search was performed for scientific articles on MEDLINE (PubMed Advanced MEDLINE Search) and EMBASE. The search included all articles up to April 2020.

Conclusion:

Surgical intervention during the active phase of ANCA–associated vasculitis disease can improve the patient’s symptoms and enable histological diagnosis. The surgical decision to manage the nose requires a multidisciplinary approach involving the vasculitis specialist and the ear, nose and throat surgeon. Nasal reconstruction can be performed to restore form and function but only when the disease is in remission so as to maximise success and minimise complications.

Long-term follow-up of repair of external nasal deformities in rhinoscleroma patients

INTRODUCTION

Rhinoscleroma (RS) is a chronic, progressive, granulomatous infectious disease endemic in Egypt and the Middle East, affecting the nose in 95-100% of cases, and resulting in functional and esthetic sequelae. The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of performing reconstructive procedures to improve external deformities in RS patients, with long-term follow up.

PATIENTS & METHODS

This prospective, controlled cohort study included 25 patients who were seeking rhinoplasty to improve their esthetic appearance, with evident clinical and histopathological history of RS. Another 25 patients seeking esthetic augmentation rhinoplasty in the same period formed the control group. All the participants were evaluated objectively by two independent rhinoplasty surgeons, and subjectively with ROE 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

All the participants showed significant improvement in esthetic facial evaluation postoperatively, with a correlative rise in ROE score. There was an insignificant difference between the studied groups. Inconsequential complications were encountered throughout the follow-up period, but with insignificant incidence in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Rhinoplasty for correction of RS external deformities is both safe and beneficial, with no risks of flaring up or increased complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2b.

Correction of saddle and short noses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review summarizes the basic concepts and recent updates on the management of saddle and short noses, with a particular focus on the selection of septal reconstruction techniques and dorsal augmentation material.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different techniques have been reported for septal cartilage reconstruction, including various combinations of extended spreader and caudal septal extension grafts, as well as L-strut grafts. For dorsal augmentation, materials that help avoid costal cartilage warping including, diced costal cartilage with or without fascia, costal cartilage obtained by oblique cutting, diced conchal cartilage with perichondrial attachments, and lipofilling of the nasal dorsum have been reported.

SUMMARY

The article highlights the importance of rebuilding the septal cartilage support system by the proper use of costal cartilage and selection of an appropriate technique for the successful management of saddle and short noses. In addition, the importance of selecting suitable dorsal augmentation materials and other adjunctive maneuvers are emphasized.

Comparison of Clinical Results in Nasal Tip Augmentation Either Via Face to Face or Back to Back Technique With Autogenous Auricular Conchal Cartilage

OBJECTIVE

To compare the objective and subjective findings between patients who underwent nasal tip augmentation surgery via two different methods using autogenous auricular conchal cartilage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included the data of 21 patients who underwent nasal tip augmentation surgery. The patients were randomly divided in two groups according to the technique used to form a double layer columellar strut graft; either face to face (group 1) and back to back (group 2). All patients were assessed via nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale (NOSE) and via acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry at preoperative and postoperative 1st and 6th months.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant improvement in symptom score in both patient groups with no difference inbetween. Total nasal resistance decreased nonsignificantly at the end of 6th month in both groups; 13.1 Pa/cm3 to 8.6 Pa/cm3 and 10.3 Pa/cm3 to 9.5 Pa/cm3 respectively. There was no significant increment in MCA values for both groups except left MCA1.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved good results in tip augmentation via both techniques. An autogenous conchal cartilage is a good alternative to replace lacking caudal septal cartilage. It provides safe and stable support to the nasal tip. However, further comprehensive studies with larger sample size and long follow-up are required to elucidate any difference between these two techniques.

Cross-specialty developments: a summary of the mutually relevant recent literature from the journal of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery

Keeping abreast of current developments is increasingly challenging when the volume of specialty articles being published is rising exponentially, and it is most acute when surgical specialties overlap, as in the case of head, neck, and facial reconstructive surgery. Here, the potential for missing key developments presents a compelling case for a summary article that highlights articles likely to be of mutual relevance. We evaluated 129 original studies and 6 reviews published in the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery between September 2012 and August 2014, and summarised the main papers of interest and merit under the subheadings of head and neck reconstruction, cleft lip and palate, craniomaxillofacial surgery, facial palsy, facial trauma, and aesthetic surgery. Most of the evidence presented (86%) is level 4.