Flexor tendon repairs in children: Outcomes from a specialist tertiary centre

Tenolysis and Salvage Procedures

Complications in flexor tendon repair are common and include tendon rupture, adhesion formation, and joint contracture. Risk factors include preexisting conditions, gross contamination, concurrent fracture, early unplanned loading of the repaired tendon, premature cessation of splinting, and aggressive early active range of motion protocols with insufficient repair strength. Rupture of a repaired tendon should be followed by early operative exploration, debridement, and revision with a four-core strand suture and nonbraided epitendinous suture. Wide-awake flexor tenolysis should be considered when adhesion formation results in the plateaued range of motion, and passive motion exceeds active motion. Two-staged reconstruction is recommended when injury results in excessive scaring, joint contracture, or an incompetent pulley apparatus.

Pediatric Flexor Tendon Injuries

The diagnosis and management of pediatric flexor tendon injuries present unique challenges to the hand surgeon. Examination of young children is not always straightforward, and tendon lacerations are frequently diagnosed late--sometimes weeks or months after the inciting injury. Four- and six-strand repair techniques are supported by recent literature, though the surgeon must remain diligent to ensure gliding of a bulky repair in a narrow tendon sheath. Beyond the operating room, postoperative management must be tailored to accommodate nuances specific to patient age and behavioral development. A fluid, patient-specific approach to every stage of management is critical for the successful treatment of pediatric flexor tendon injuries.

Relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The relative motion (RM) orthosis was introduced over 40 years ago for extensor tendon rehabilitation and more recently applied to flexor tendon repairs.

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the evidence for RM orthoses following surgical repair of finger extensor and flexor tendon injuries including indications for use, configuration and schedule of orthosis wear, and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched eight databases and five trial registries, from database inception to January 7, 2022. The protocol was registered prospectively (CRD42020211579). We identified studies describing patients undergoing rehabilitation using RM orthoses after surgical repair of acute tendon injuries of the finger and hand.

RESULTS

For extensor tendon repairs, ten studies, one trial registry and five conference abstracts met inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes of 521 patients with injuries in zones IV-VII. Miller's criteria were predominantly used to report range of motion; with 89.6% and 86.9% reporting good or excellent outcomes for extension lag and flexion deficit, respectively. For flexor tendon repairs, one retrospective case series was included reporting outcomes in eight patients following zones I-II repairs. Mean total active motion was 86%. No tendon ruptures were reported due to the orthosis not protecting the repair for either the RME or RMF approaches.

DISCUSSION

Variation was seen in use of RME plus or only, use of night orthoses and orthotic wear schedules, which may be the result of evolution of the RM approach. Since Hirth et al's 2016 scoping review, there are five additional studies, including two RCTs reporting the use of the RM orthosis in extensor tendon rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is now good evidence that the RM approach is safe in zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs. Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs. Further high-quality clinical studies are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Pediatric Population

Flexor tendon injuries are rare in children, posing specific diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aims to describe epidemiologic characteristics of flexor tendon injuries in children and evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with acute traumatic flexor tendon injuries treated between 2012 and 2019. We analyzed demographics, lesion mechanism, surgical technique, clinical results, complications, and secondary surgical procedures. Functional results were assessed through the Total Active Mobilization score. Twenty patients were included (n=34 tendons), with median follow-up of 7 months (range, 3-34 months) and median age at time of surgery of 13 years (range, 1-17 years). Male sex was predominant (n=16). The most prevalent injury mechanism was a cut (n=17), mostly affecting the 4th digit (n=10) and Verdan's zone II (n=13). Modified Kessler was the suture technique most commonly used (n=31), and polypropylene was the preferred suture material (n=19). All patients were immobilized with a splint for a median time of 4 weeks (range, 1-7 weeks). According to the Total Active Mobilization score, 15 patients reached a score greater than 75%, independently of age (P>.05). Stiffness was the main complication observed. Complications were identified in 37% of patients and were most common in those older than age 10 years (P>.05) and those with zone II lesions (P>.05). Four patients (20%) needed a second surgical intervention. Flexor tendon injuries in children are relatively uncommon and prevail in the male sex, similarly to the adult population. The principal complication observed was stiffness, which was more prevalent in children older than age 10 years, although without relevant functional implications, as surgical treatment enabled good or excellent outcomes in 75% of patients. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):82-85.].

Functional outcomes of a modified Duran postoperative rehabilitation protocol after primary repairs of pediatric hand flexor tendon injuries

The objective of this study was to determine whether pediatric patients undergoing flexor tendon repair who underwent 4 weeks of immobilization followed by a modified Duran controlled passive motion rehabilitation protocol will have favorable outcomes. A study was performed at a tertiary pediatric hospital of patients <18 years who underwent primary flexor tendon repairs in zones 1-4. Outcomes were calculated by total active motion and classified by the original Strickland criteria or Buck-Gramcko criteria. Twenty-eight patients with 34 injured fingers were included. Mean age was 11.4 years (range 2.4-17.9) with 17 males (61%) and 11 females (39%). Thirty-five percent of injuries occurred in zone 1; 35% zone 2; 6% zone 3; and 24% zone 4. All underwent a modified Duran postoperative rehabilitation protocol following a period of immobilization. The majority of patients achieved favorable outcomes, with 86% of cases classified as good/excellent. Thirty (88%) cases received surgery acutely (within 3 weeks). Of these, 70% achieved excellent outcomes, 17% good, and 13% fair. Four (12%) chronic cases underwent primary repair (range 24-68 days), achieving excellent outcomes in 50%, good in 25%, and fair in 25%. Three (75%) patients with delayed primary repair exhibited stiffness, which was greater than the 17% of patients with acute repairs ( P = 0.03). Approximately 1 month of immobilization followed by a modified Duran rehabilitation protocol leads to favorable outcomes in children with flexor tendon repairs. Children with delayed surgery (>3 weeks) who underwent primary repair generally still achieved good outcomes but were more likely to have stiffness. Level of evidence: III.

Outcomes After Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Pediatric Population: A 10-Year Retrospective Review

Background: Pediatric outcomes after flexor tendon repairs are variable, and evidence in the literature remains scarce. Methods: Repair of pediatric flexor tendon injuries was reviewed over a 10-year period (2005-2015). Data collection consisted of patient demographics, injury characteristics, anesthetic choice, repair technique, rehabilitation protocol, American Society for Surgery of the Hand Total Active Motion (TAM) scores, and complications. Results: There were 109 patients included in our study, with a total of 162 digits injured and 235 flexor tendon injuries. The mean age was 12 ± 4.6 years. The small finger (48 of 162; 30%) and the flexor digitorum profundus tendon (126 of 235) were the most commonly injured. The mechanism of injury was mainly from a knife (46 of 109; 42.2%) in zone II (82 of 159; 52%). Injuries were mostly repaired under general anesthetic (61 of 104; 56%). The Kessler technique was the predominant repair mechanism (111 of 225 repairs; 49%). Most patients (103 of 109; 95%) had excellent or good TAM scores with 5 postoperative ruptures reported. The most common complication was stiffness (17 of 121 complications; 14%), with most patients having no complications ( 74 of 109 patients; 68%). Patients were commonly immobilized (mean 8.4 ± 10.3 weeks) with a splint (93 of 109; 85%). There were 85 patients who followed a postoperative rehabilitation protocol for 12 ± 18 weeks. Patient demographics, time of repair, injury characteristics, anesthetic choice, and rehabilitation protocol were not significantly correlated with TAM scores or complication rates. Conclusions: Pediatric tendon injuries have good outcomes with no predictive factors identified. Surgical repairs performed under local anesthetic have similar outcomes without increased rates of complications, but remain underused in the pediatric population.

Management and outcomes of flexor tendon repairs at a peripheral hospital: a New Zealand case series study

BACKGROUND

Current evidence for flexor tendon repair management and outcomes performed at peripheral centres is unclear. Most studies are based on evidence from specialist hand centres. This study evaluated a peripheral hospital in New Zealand; where all flexor tendon repairs were performed by a generalist Orthopaedic service. The purpose of the study was to benchmark management and outcomes from a peripheral hospital in comparison to international standards.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre consecutive case series of Zones I and II flexor tendon repairs was extracted between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018. Medical records were used to evaluate management and outcomes of repairs. Hand therapy notes were used to evaluate rehabilitation protocols provided. The primary objective was to measure re-rupture and re-operation rates. Secondary objectives included auditing operative management and hand therapy compliance.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (76 tendon repairs) were included in our final analysis. Mean follow up time to last clinical appointment was 11.8 weeks, and to last patient episode was 4.9 years. Most patients received timely surgery with a four-core repair using 3-0 or larger suture. All hand therapy followed a controlled active motion protocol. The re-operation rate was 19.6% (P = <0.05) and the re-rupture rate was 8.7% (P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Most flexor tendon injuries at this peripheral centre were managed according to international standards. However, high complication rates including re-operation and re-rupture occurred. Due to a lack of local comparison studies, confounding factors cannot be excluded as a contributor for these results.

Relative motion flexion splinting for the rehabilitation of flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review

Introduction

Relative motion splinting has been used successfully in the treatment of extensor tendon repairs and has recently been applied in flexor tendon rehabilitation. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify articles reporting use of relative motion flexion (RMF) splinting following flexor tendon repair and to examine indications for use and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Seven medical databases, four trials registries and three grey literature sources were systematically searched and screened against pre-specified eligibility criteria. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were independently performed by two reviewers.

Results

A total of 12 studies were identified, of which three met the review eligibility criteria: one retrospective case series; one cadaveric proof of concept study; and one ongoing prospective case series. The type of splint (including metacarpophalangeal joint position and available movement), exercise programme, and zone of tendon injury varied between studies. Both case series presented acceptable range of movement and grip strength outcomes. The prospective series reported one tendon rupture and two tenolysis procedures; the retrospective series reported no tendon ruptures or secondary surgeries.

Discussion

We found limited evidence supporting the use of RMF splinting in the rehabilitation of zones I-III flexor tendon repairs. Further prospective research with larger patient cohorts is required to assess the clinical outcomes, patient reported outcomes and safety of RMF splinting in comparison to other regimes. Application of the relative motion principles to flexor tendon splinting varied across the included studies, and we suggest an operational definition of relative motion in this context.

Effect of hand dominance on functional outcomes in paediatric patients with flexor tendon injuries: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data in the literature about the short- to mid-term results of children with flexor tendon injuries. We aim to evaluate the short- to mid-term functional outcomes of children with flexor tendon injuries and to disclose whether the injured side affects the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had undergone primary flexor tendon repair were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Modified Hand Injury Severity Score was calculated for each patient. Sensory, motor and functional assessments of the bilateral hand were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients (female = 16, male = 28) with a median age of 13 (6-17) were evaluated. Significant differences between the affected and healthy hands of the patients in terms of grip and pinch strengths and monofilament sensory test results were demonstrated while the Jebson Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) scores were similar. No factor other than the injury side was found to be related to the affected hand functions. In patients with dominant hand injuries, JTHFT results of the affected hands were similar to the results of healthy dominant hands (P = .935). However, JTHFT results were found to be worse in the affected non-dominant hands compared to healthy non-dominant hands (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that paediatric population with flexor tendon injuries in their dominant hands has better short- to mid-term functional outcomes. These results may be attributed to use their injured dominant hand more actively in daily activities.

Flexor tendon rehabilitation in the 21st century: A systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

The rehabilitation of patients following flexor tendon injury has progressed from immobilization to true active flexion with the addition of wrist motion over the last 75 years.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This review specifically intended to determine whether there is evidence to support one type of exercise regimen, early passive, place and hold, or true active, as superior for producing safe and maximal range of motion following flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

The preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-P 2015) checklist was utilized to format the review. Both reviewers collaborated on all aspects of the research, including identifying inclusion/exclusion factors, search terms, reading and scoring articles, and authoring the paper. Articles were independently scored by each reviewer using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES).

RESULTS

A total of nine intervention studies that included a rehabilitative comparison group were systematically reviewed: one pediatric, four comparing passive flexion protocols to place and hold flexion, and four comparing true active flexion to passive and/or place and hold flexion.

DISCUSSION

This review provides moderate to strong evidence that place and hold exercises provide better outcomes than passive flexion protocols for patients with two to six-strand repairs. The studies included in this review suffered from methodological limitations including short timeframes for follow-up, unequal group distribution, and limited attention to repair site strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a lack of superior benefits following true active motion regimens, there is not sufficient evidence to support true active motion as an effective or preferable choice for flexor tendon rehabilitation at this time.

Outcomes of digital artery revascularization in pediatric trauma

BACKGROUND

Digit amputation is rare in pediatric trauma but can lead to functional morbidity. The true incidence of digital arterial injury is lacking in the literature, and revascularization techniques are not well-described.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a pediatric trauma registry identified patients with a digital artery injury between July 2008 and December 2013. Isolated vein injuries and arterial injuries proximal to the digits were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects met inclusion. Most were male (n=16; 64%) and the median age was 6.8 (IQR: 2.8, 11.1) years. The most common blunt (n=12) trauma was struck/crushed by object (n=4; 33%) and the most common penetrating (n=13) trauma was because of glass (n=9; 69%). All subjects were managed operatively. Initial operations for arterial repair were primary arterial repair (15; 20%), vein graft (7; 28%), thrombectomy (1; 4%), and amputation (1; 4%). Twelve patients (48%) had reported complications at initial follow-up, but only two (8%) had long-term (>24weeks) sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Digital artery injury is rare among pediatric traumas. Functional outcomes after digital artery revascularization are favorable. Primary repair can successfully manage these injuries and vein grafting appears to be a suitable alternative when primary repair is not feasible.