The pre-expanded subclavicular island flap: A new tool for facial reconstruction

A Comprehensive Review on the Supraclavicular Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

The supraclavicular artery flap (SCF) is a highly vascularized fasciocutaneous flap overlying the shoulder. The flap was first described in 1979 by Lamberty but did not gain popularity until much later due to lack of a reliable technique. The main advantages of using the SCF include avoiding microsurgical techniques, requiring only a single-stage operation, shorter operative time compared with alternative options, and a wider patient population including those with comorbidities who may be excluded from more extensive operations including free flaps surgeries. The SCF has been successfully performed on individuals with advanced age, poor nutrition, cachexia, obesity, diabetes, tobacco use, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, asthma, and steroid use. The largest disadvantages of the SCF include the possibility of distal tip necrosis, size limitation without pre-expansion, and a moderately visible donor site scar. The following review and meta-analysis of the SCF details its use historically as both an island and a pedicle flap, and its application in head and neck reconstruction.

Subclavicular flap: A valid reconstructive option among anterior chest flaps in oral cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The subclavicular pedicled flap is based on the thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery, and it represents a versatile reconstructive option for low-middle third face defects. Since its use in head and neck surgical oncology has not been popularized yet, we propose its application for oral cavity reconstruction after cancer resection by showing favorable results.

METHODS

Eighteen subclavicular pedicled flaps were used to treat intraoral defects after oral squamous-cell cancer resection between June 2015 and December 2018. Tumor dissection type, complications, donor and reconstructed area results, and functional and aesthetic outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

No major complications were observed and all of the flaps survived. Adjuvant therapy was administered without delay when needed, and all of the patients had normal functional outcomes and good aesthetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

The subclavicular flap is an excellent choice for the reconstruction of oral cavity defects. Selection of patients should exclude positive lower-third neck node and include appropriate informed consent for women due to the possibility of deformity of the breast. In our opinion, this flap has the potential for common application given its consistent anatomy and donor site advantages, including long pedicle, high pivot point, and relatively unlimited flap width.