Anatomical reconstruction of the fourth brachymetatarsia with one-stage iliac bone and cartilage cap grafting

Subacute two stage metatarsal lengthening with gradual distraction for brachymetatarsia: A consecutive case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

This study examined the functional and clinical outcomes of subacute two stage metatarsal lengthening with gradual distraction for brachymetatarsia. This technique was developed to overcome the disadvantages of one-stage metatarsal lengthening and gradual distraction.

METHODS

Four feet of three patients with congenital brachymetatarsia underwent subacute two stage metatarsal lengthening with gradual distraction. Pain, function, and alignment were assessed preoperatively and at follow-ups using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale, and any complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 18.1 ± 6.9 (range, 12.6-28.1) months. The mean metatarsal length gain was 15.2 ± 3.2 (range, 12.1-18.5) mm, and the corresponding percent increase was 32.5 % ± 7.0 % (range, 25.7-41.1 %). The mean AOFAS score (0-100) was 97.5 ± 5.0 at the final follow-up. The external fixator index was 10.2 ± 1.5 (range, 8.1-11.6) days/cm. None of the patients experienced metatarsophalangeal stiffness, subluxation or dislocation of the metatarsophalangeal joint, loss of correction, pin tract infection, delayed union, nonunion, or angular deformities.

CONCLUSION

Subacute two stage metatarsal lengthening with gradual distraction is a reliable alternative treatment for brachymetatarsia.

Brachymetatarsia: Surgical Management, Case Report, and Literature Review

Background

Brachymetatarsia is defined by an abnormal shortening of the metatarsal bone. This rare condition is mostly primary and congenital. Consequences of this malformation are both esthetic and functional, due to pain and mechanical problems in the forefoot. Surgical management is an important part of patient care. There are two main options: gradual lengthening by progressive callotosis distraction using an external fixator and one stage lengthening using bone graft and osteotomy of the bone. This review presents two cases using the one stage lengthening surgical management method. We also discuss some reports in the literature with the aim to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods. Literature concerning the surgical management of brachymetatarsia was identified using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Patient Presentation. We describe two female patients aged 20 and 26 years who underwent one stage lengthening surgery of the fourth toe with isolated brachymetatarsia using an iliac bone graft and internal fixator plate. The two patients had a lengthening of around 10 mm after postoperative evaluation. No skin complications were noted, but one of the patients reported flexor stiffness after surgery. Concerning the functional and cosmetic aspects, the two patients are satisfied with the management.

Conclusions

In the literature, one stage lengthening seems to be the most favorable option for the care of brachymetatarsia. Studies show a short healing time and fewer complications like infection, stiffness, malalignment, and malunion. Some reviews note the utility of the gradual lengthening of severe brachymetatarsia when a longer lengthening is necessary. There is no definite consensus concerning the management of brachymetatarsia.

Value of ultrasonography and radiography for the study of bone regeneration in lengthening of the fourth ray in brachymetatarsia

BACKGROUND

Distraction osteogenesis is frequently used for brachymetatarsia.

METHODS

Brachymetatarsia of the fourth ray was treated with the Ilizarov method in 10 females. Distraction rate was 1.00-0.75mm a day. Radiography and ultrasonography were used to study the regeneration course throughout the distraction and fixation phases.

RESULTS

Mean lengthening achieved was 2.28cm in the average distraction period of 30.2 days and average fixation phase of 50.2 days. Ultrasonography detected the regeneration signs and zonal structure of the regenerate earlier than radiography. It confirmed slow regeneration in two patients and their distraction rate was corrected. One patient had premature consolidation on distraction day 10 and needed re-osteotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of radiography and ultrasonography to study bone regeneration in brachymetatarsisa provides a better monitoring of distraction callus progression. Ultrasonography is of great value to detect regeneration problems during early stages of lengthening.

Brachymetacarpia and brachymetatarsia: do we need to operate?

Brachymetacarpia and brachymetatarsia are rare congenital presentations denoted by shortening of metacarpals and metatarsals respectively, in which the deformity usually presents around childhood/early adolescence.

The aetiology is usually congenital besides several other syndromic or endocrinologic associations.

Cosmetic issues such as absence of a normal-looking knuckle while making a fist or disruption of finger-tip curvature besides functional issues are the main indications for surgical intervention in brachymetacarpia.

In the foot, apart from cosmetic issues, pain due to transfer metatarsalgia as well as callosities along with toe deformities which lead to difficulty of using footwear are the main indications for intervention.

Lengthening of the affected bone, either acute with grafting or gradual, is the mainstay of treatment. Gradual lengthening can be either single-stage as in callotasis, or two-stage where the primary procedure is followed by bone grafting after the length has been achieved.

Adolescence, specifically between 12 and 15 years, is the preferred period for surgical intervention in these cases.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:15-23. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200087

Brachymetatarsia: One-stage Versus Two-Stage Procedures

Brachymetatarsia is a rare deformity with controversial clinical presentation. Multiple acute and gradual lengthening surgical techniques have been described for correction of this type of foot deformity. All techniques try to create a better appearance, facilitate shoeing, or solve possible transfer metatarsalgia. Either acute lengthening (1-stage procedure) or gradual lengthening (2 stages) is selected based on the patient's deformities, concerns, and clinical needs.