Re-introducing the delto-acromial perforator flap: Clinical experience and cadaver dissection

Delto-acromial artery perforator flap combined with a radial forearm free flap as a "vascular bridge" for nasal reconstruction

Nasal reconstruction for total rhinectomy is challenging, especially if locoregional flaps are unavailable. Herein, we report the case of a nasal reconstruction combining a forearm free flap as "vascular bridge" and a Delto-Acromial Artery Perforator (DAAP) flap in its free form. The forearm free flap was used to restore missing elements of the nasal lining while the distal part of the radial pedicle has served as a donor vessel for the DAAP free flap which restores the nasal covering. A chondrocostal graft was used as a nasal framework. The nasal aspect at 24 months postop support the patient's satisfaction. The main advantages of the DAAP Flap are the pliability, relative hairless nature, skin thinness and its geographical proximity with the nose avoiding major dyschromia. Moreover, the anatomy consistency makes it easier to harvest, the underlying muscles are respected, and it allows for tension free primary closure without shoulder movement limitation.

Regional Salvage Flap Options in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Microvascular free tissue transfer is the standard in the complex head and neck reconstruction with success rates greater than 95%. Free tissue transfer allows for more versatility in reconstructing complex defects with better tissue match. Failures, however, do occur and subsequent free tissue transfer might not be an option due to either the patients' health or in a vessel depleted neck. In these challenging salvage scenarios, the head and neck reconstructive surgeon must turn to regional flaps for reconstruction. Here, we review multiple regional flap options for salvage head and neck reconstruction.

Perforator Flaps Based on the Terminal Perforators of the Pectoral Branch of Thoracoacromial Vessels Axis: A Viable Option in the Head and Neck Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to develop a new method for elevating the pedicled terminal pectoral perforator flaps (PTPPFs) and to resolve the difficulties and controversies that shroud the anatomy of terminal pectoral perforators from the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial axis.

AIM

Anatomical study was conducted to assess the feasibility of perforator flaps based on the terminal perforators of the pectoral branch of the thoracoacromial vessel axis. The knowledge that gleaned from this anatomical study was applied in the clinical scenario. A clinical retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of PTPPFs for the reconstruction of postexcisional head and neck defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty cadaveric specimens were examined for the anatomy of the terminal musculocutaneous pectoral branch perforators. Thirty-two cases (22 males, 10 females) of various head and neck postexcision defects were reconstructed with the PTPPFs in a single-stage manner. Pectoralis major muscle with its innervation was spared in all cases. All the secondary defects were closed primarily.

RESULTS

The maximum cutaneous paddle size was 156 cm harvested on a single best terminal pectoral branch perforator. The average size of the cutaneous paddle harvested was 73.47 cm. The flap complications noted (9.3%) were trivial, and all the flaps survived well. The average institutional computed score for esthetic and functional recovery at the donor and reconstructed site done by 2 independent observers were 4.56 and 3.78, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The recruitment of the chest skin on the terminal pectoral branch perforators resulted in a long pedicle flap with adequate qualities like color match, texture match, and pliability. This flap shall serve as a primary option for pedicle and free flap head and neck reconstructions.