Improvement in interpretation of indocyanine green angiography

Indocyanine Green Angiography Precise Marking for Indeterminate Burn Excision: A Prospective, Multi-centered, Double-blinded Study

BACKGROUND

During burn excision, the clinical judgment whether to excise or not excise the area with indeterminate burn depth is difficult. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has been reported to provide high accuracy in diagnosing indeterminate burns. This study aims to evaluate the complete wound closures in both short-term and long-term outcomes after using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multi-centered, double-blinded, experimental study. The participants were admitted to the hospital with indeterminate burn wounds. ICGA precise marking was performed. The deep second-degree burn was painted, excised, and subsequently covered with skin grafts and measured on day 5. The superficial burns were measured on day 21. All wounds were followed-up at two months.

RESULTS

Thirty indeterminate burn sites were included in this study. Using ICGA precise marking, the overall rate of short-term complete wound closure, which combined superficial and deep burns, was found to be as high as 96.7% (29/30). The long-term complete wound closures at two months confirmed the short-term result and yielded 100.0% of complete wound closure. The complete wound closures between the short-term and long-term measurements were not significantly different (P > 0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision resulted in an excellent rate of complete wound closure and an insignificant difference between short-term and long-term wound outcomes. ICGA is a competent method to aid decision-making in burn surgery of the indeterminate area.

An Inconvenient Truth of Clinical Assessment and Indocyanine Green Angiography Precise Marking for Indeterminate Burn Excision

Background:

The clinical assessment of indeterminate burn wounds has relatively poor accuracy. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has high accuracy and can be used to mark wounds precisely so as to guide burn excision. This study aimed to assess the differences between ICGA and clinical assessment marking and compare the marking result with the long-term wound outcome.

Methods:

This was a prospective, multicentered, triple-blinded, experimental study. Indeterminate burn wounds were clinically assessed, and the area to be excised was firstly marked by the attending surgeon. ICGA marking was then performed by a second surgeon. Measurement of the marked area was conducted by a third surgeon. Three surgeons were each blinded to the others' processes. The wounds were followed up to assess complete wound closures on day 21.

Results:

There were 20 burn sites included in the study. There was a significant difference in the marked areas between clinical assessment and ICGA (mean, 57.3 ± 44.1%; P = 0.001). The maximum difference found was as high as 160.9%. The correction rate of ICGA marking to complete wound closure on day 21 was 95.0%. Over 90% of the decreased areas of excision—which were assessed by ICGA to be superficial burns but evaluated by clinical assessment to be deep burns—were completely healed on day 21.

Conclusions:

ICGA contributes to a significant difference versus clinical assessment in the marking for excision of indeterminate burns and strongly associates with long-term wound outcomes. The burn wounds can be assessed precisely to reduce unnecessary excision and prevent inadequate excision.