Surgery for lower extremity symptomatic neuroma: Long-term outcomes

Neuropathic pain of the superficial branch of the radial nerve - Factors influencing surgical outcome and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Due to its partially superficial course, the superficial branch of the radial nerve is vulnerable to injury by trauma or surgery, potentially leading to painful neuroma. Surgical treatment is difficult. Among other factors, smoking and duration of pain before revision surgery have been suggested as risk factors for persistent pain after surgical revision, without concrete evidence. The aim of this study was therefore to identify factors influencing the outcome of revision surgery in SBRN neuropathic pain in our department.

METHODS

All 51 patients receiving revision surgery of the superficial branch of the radial nerve for neuropathic pain from 2010 to 2020 were contacted; 19 agreed to return for assessment. A medical chart review was performed to collect patient-, pain- and treatment-specific factors. Outcomes were recorded. In an outpatient consultation, clinical follow-up was performed and patients filled out the DASH, MHQ and painDETECT questionnaires.

RESULTS

After revision surgery, all patients experienced persistent pain. On multivariate logistic regression evaluating the risk of persistent pain, only smoking emerged as an independent risk factor. Age, gender, dominant side, location, time between trigger and surgery or diagnosis did not emerge as risk factors. No predictor for successful return to work could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of painful neuroma of the superficial branch of the radial nerve is a challenge. Patients with neuropathic pain should be coached toward smoking cessation before neuroma surgery. Surgery can show benefit even after long symptom duration. No correlations between study clinical variables or test results and return to work could be identified, suggesting that other factors play a role in return to work.

A case of eyelid neuroma with recurrent ptosis

Purpose

We report a rare case of eyelid neuroma, discovered nine years after external levator advancement, presenting with recalcitrant ocular foreign body sensation and pain, persistent corneal epithelial defect, followed by corneal scarring, and ptosis.

Observations

An 85-year-old man with a history of multiple skin cancers presented with left ptosis, epiphora and recalcitrant eye pain. Nine years prior to presentation, he underwent excision of melanoma in situ of the left forehead, followed by simultaneous forehead reconstruction and left external ptosis repair. At presentation, he had left ptosis and left superior corneal scarring. Eversion of the eyelid demonstrated the presence of a nodule at the superior border of the tarsus. The patient underwent simultaneous excisional biopsy of the lesion and posterior ptosis repair by Müller muscle conjunctival resection (MMCR). He experienced postoperative resolution of pain, ptosis and epiphora. Histopathologic examination demonstrated the presence of a foreign body granuloma alongside a neuroma.

Conclusions

This case highlights the importance of thorough eyelid exam in individuals with ocular surface disease. We review herein the pathophysiology and histopathology of eyelid neuroma.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Sural Neuritis: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Somatic nerve pain is one of the most common complications following surgery of the foot and ankle but may also arise following traumatic injury or chronic nerve compression. The sural nerve is a commonly affected nerve in the foot and ankle; it is at risk given the proximity to frequently used surgical approaches, exposure to crush injuries, and traction from severe ankle inversion injuries. The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of sural nerve neurectomy with proximal implantation for sural neuromas (SN) and chronic sural neuritis (CSN).

METHODS

Patients that underwent neurectomy with proximal implantation (20 muscle, 1 adipose tissue) by 2 foot and ankle specialists for isolated SN- and CSN-related pain at a single tertiary institution were included. Demographic data, baseline outcomes including 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded. Final follow-up questionnaires using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) lower extremity function, pain interference (PI), and neuropathic pain quality, FAAM, and VAS were administered using REDCap. Perioperative factors including neuropathic medications, diagnostic injections, the use of collagen wraps, and perioperative ketamine were collected from the medical record. Descriptive statistics were performed and potential changes in patient-reported outcome measure scores were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

The 21 patients meeting inclusion criteria for this study had a median age of 47 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43-49) and had median follow-up duration of 33.7 months (IQR, 4.5-47.6). Median FAAM activities of daily living score improved from 40.6 (38.7-50.7) preoperatively to 66.1 (53.6-83.3) postoperatively, P = .032. FAAM sports scores improved from 14.1 (7.8-21.9) to 41.1 (25.0-60.9) postoperatively, P = .002. VAS scores improved from a median of 9.0 (8.0-9.0) to 3.0 (3.0-6.0), P < .001. At final follow-up, patients reported PROMIS lower extremity function score median of 43.8 (35.6-54.9), PROMIS neuropathic pain quality score of 54.1 (43.6-61.6), and PROMIS PI of 57.7 (41.1-63.8). Patients with both anxiety and depression reported less improvement in pain and physical. Other perioperative factors lacked sufficient numbers for statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

Sural nerve neurectomy and proximal implantation (20 muscle, 1 adipose) provided significant improvement in pain and function for patients with sural neuromas and chronic sural neuritis at median follow-up of 33.7 months. Anxiety and depression were associated with significantly poorer outcomes following surgery. Patients with CRPS as well as recent nicotine use tended to report less improvement in pain and worse function after surgery, although this sample size was too limited for statistical analysis of these variables. Further research is needed to identify the ideal surgical candidates and perioperative factors to optimize patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Association Between Fulfillment of Preoperative Expectations and Diagnosis in Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

There has been growing interest in patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and the fulfillment of patient expectations is a potentially powerful tool that compares preoperative expectations and perceived postoperative improvement. Prior work has validated the use of expectation fulfillment in foot and ankle surgery. However, given the wide spectrum of pathologies and treatments in foot and ankle, no study has examined the association between expectation fulfillment and specific diagnosis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 266 patients who completed the Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Survey (FAOS) preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated using the pre- and postoperative Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey scores. An estimated mean fulfillment proportion for each diagnosis was calculated using a multivariable linear regression model, and pairwise comparisons were used to compare the FP between diagnoses.

RESULTS

All diagnoses had an FP less than 1, indicating partially fulfilled expectations. Ankle arthritis had the highest FP (0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), whereas neuromas and mid/hindfoot diagnoses had the lowest FPs (0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). Higher preoperative expectations were correlated with lower fulfillment proportions.

CONCLUSION

FP varied with diagnosis and preoperative expectations. An understanding of current expectation fulfillment among different diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery helps highlight areas for improvement in the management of expectations for presumed diagnoses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective review of prospective cohort study.

Traditional Neuroma Management Strategies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In this systematic review, the authors discuss traditional management strategies of neuromas. Surgical management can be described as either passive and ablative or active and reconstructive. Our aim was to evaluate the evidence supporting traditional management strategies in patients affected by neuromas.

METHODS

The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE databases using search terms related to neuromas and their surgical management. Studies involving targeted muscle reinnervation or regenerative peripheral nerve interface were excluded. Two reviewers selected the studies, evaluated their methodological quality, and retrieved data independently. This review was conducted in a manner consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Selected studies were analyzed for pain and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1064 articles were identified, and 22 studies were selected for review. Passive or ablative modalities for treatment of neuromata include excision of neuroma, excision with implantation into adjacent tissue, nerve caps, vein cap, and relocation nerve grafting. Active or reconstructive modalities that allow for nerve regeneration include hollow tube reconstruction, reconstruction with an allograft, and centrocentral nerve anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Passive treatment modalities can offer reliable pain relief in appropriately selected patients but do not allow for nerve regeneration. As such active, reconstructive modalities should be used when possible.

The Neuroma Startle Sign: A Surgical Indicator of Proximity to an Injured Nerve

During operative intervention for the treatment of symptomatic neuromas, the authors have observed a hypersensitive "startle" response to stimulation in proximity to the painful nerve. This physiologic sign is an indicator of the specific anatomic localization of the painful stimulus, commonly a symptomatic neuroma, that appears to be reproducible. The aim of this article is to describe this "neuroma startle sign," posit the underlying mechanism for this observation, and propose how this phenomenon could be clinically harnessed for innovation and optimization in both surgery and anesthesia for more effective symptomatic neuroma localization.

A cohort study on neuropathic pain of the saphenous nerve—factors influencing surgical outcome

Background

Due to its partially superficial course, the saphenous nerve is vulnerable to injury by trauma or surgery potentially leading to painful neuroma formation. Different surgical techniques to treat neuroma have been described, but so far, no one has proven to be superior to the others. The aim of this study was therefore to identify factors influencing the outcome of revision surgery in saphenous nerve neuropathic pain in our department.

Methods

From 2010 to 2020, a total of 29 consecutive patients with neuropathic pain and suspected neuroma of the saphenous nerve underwent revision surgery. A medical chart review was performed to collect patient-, pain-, and treatment-specific factors. Outcomes were registered.

Results

Post revision surgery in neuropathic pain of the saphenous nerve, 16 (55.2%) patients suffered from persisting pain. In multivariable logistic regression models evaluating the risk of persisting pain post saphenous nerve revision surgery, both smoking and preoperative opiate consumption represented independent predictors of higher risk for persisting pain.

Conclusions

Patients with injury to the saphenous nerve should be coached toward smoking cessation. Whenever possible, forgoing opiate treatment might be beneficial.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Risk/Prognostic.

A retrospective case series of prophylactic neurectomy during total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Total knee arthroplasty is a common operation performed to relieve pain and restore functional activity. While overall widely successful, a subset of patients has continued pain postoperatively with no identifiable cause. Neuroma formation has been identified as a possible contributor to this unexplained pain, often necessitating an additional procedure for neuroma removal. The purpose of our study was to evaluate if prophylactic neurectomy could reduce the occurrence of postoperative pain.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients were compared, 44 control patients and 68 neurectomy patients. Demographic information, Numerical rating pain scale (NRS) and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were collected pre- and post-operatively. Patients were additional asked if they were overall satisfied with the operation.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups with respect to age (Median: 71 vs 69 years, p = 0.28), male sex (41% vs 44%, p = 0.85), or body mass index (Median: 32.2 vs 31.3, p = 0.80). When comparing the degree of change following surgery there were no statistically significant differences observed in NRS pain scores (Median change: -7 vs -6, p = 0.89) or KSS scores (Median change: +44 vs +40, p = 0.14). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in overall patient-reported satisfaction with the knee replacement (82.5% vs 86.6%, p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

We did not find a statistically significant difference in NRS, KSS, or overall patient satisfaction between the prophylactic neurectomy and control patient groups. Larger studies with evaluation of the nerve diameter will be needed to determine which patients are at risk for symptomatic neuroma development following total knee arthroplasty.

Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces in Elective Lower Limb Amputations

Regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) is a relatively new surgical technique to manage neuromas and phantom pain after limb amputation. This study evaluates prophylactic RPNI efficacy in managing post-amputation pain and neuroma formation in amputees compared with patients in which lower limb amputation was performed without this procedure. We included 28 patients who underwent above the knee amputation (AKA) or below the knee amputation (BKA) for severe soft tissue infection from July 2019 till December 2020. All patients had insulin-dependent diabetes. The patients were divided into two groups, 14 patients with primary RPNI and 14 patients without. We analyzed the demographic data, level of amputation, number of RPNIs, operative time, postoperative complications and functional outcome on the defined follow up period. The mean patient age was 68.6 years (range 49-85), 19 (67.9 %) male and 9 (32.1 %) female patients. In this study 11 (39.3 %) AKA and 17 (60.7 %) BKA were performed. Overall, 37 RPNIs were made. The mean follow-up period was 49 weeks. PROMIS T-score decreased by 15.9 points in favor for the patients with RPNI. The VAS score showed that, in the RPNI group, all 14 patients were without pain compared to the group of patients without RPNI, where the 11 (78.6 %) patients described their pain as severe. Patients with RPNI used prosthesis significantly more (p < 0.005). Data showed significant reduction in pain and high patient satisfaction after amputation with RPNIs. This technique is oriented as to prevent neuroma formation with RPNI surgery, performed at the time of amputation. RPNI surgery did not provoke complications or significant lengthening of operative time and it should be furthermore exploited as a surgical technique.

Management of chronic knee pain caused by postsurgical or posttraumatic neuroma of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve

PURPOSE

Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IBSN) is a relatively common complication after knee surgery, which can interfere with patient satisfaction and functional outcome. In some cases, injury to the IBSN can lead to formation of a painful neuroma. The purpose of this study was to report the results of surgical treatment in a series of patients with IBSN painful neuroma.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 37 patients who underwent resection of IBSN painful neuroma at our institution, after failure of non-operative treatment for a minimum of 6 months. Injury to the IBSN resulted from prior orthopedic surgery, vascular surgery, tumor resection, trauma, or infection. Leg pain and health-related quality of life were measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvement in leg pain was defined as reduction in NRS by at least 3 points. Predictors of favorable and unfavorable surgical outcome were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patient-reported leg pain, health-related quality of life, and overall satisfaction with the surgical outcome were obtained at 94 ± 52.9 months after neuroma surgery. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes were available for 25 patients (68% of the cohort), of whom 20 patients (80.0%) reported improvement in leg pain, 17 patients (68.0%) reported clinically meaningful improvement in leg pain, and 17 patients (68%) reported improvement in health-related quality of life. The average NRS pain score improved from 9.43 ± 1.34 to 5.12 ± 3.33 (p < 0.01) and the average EQ-5D functional score improved from 10.48 ± 2.33 to 7.84 ± 2.19 (p < 0.01). Overall patient reported satisfaction with the surgical outcome was good to excellent for 18 patients (72.0%). Older age, multiple prior orthopedic knee surgeries, and failed prior attempts to resect an IBSN neuroma were associated with non-favorable surgical outcome.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that surgical intervention is efficacious for appropriately selected patients suffering from IBSN painful neuroma.