Type of maxillary segment mobilization affects three-dimensional nasal morphology

Septal Extension Graft in Cleft Rhinoplasty: Patients with Secondary Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Tip refinement procedures are still controversial in secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty. The aim of this study was to assess whether the septal extension graft improved nasal and tip deformity and achieved a normal profile with clinical and three-dimensional morphometric analyses.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 194 skeletally mature patients with unilateral cleft were included and analyzed. All had undergone secondary open rhinoplasty, performed by a single surgeon, with the use of the septal extension graft between 2013 and 2021. Clinical data were collected, and three-dimensional morphometric measurements were performed. An age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched normal group was included for comparisons.

RESULTS

The authors' standard procedures included open approach combining reverse-U incision, septal extension graft, dorsal augmentation, lip revision, and vermilion augmentation. The postoperative outcome showed significantly increased numerical values (nasal bridge length, nasal height, nasal tip projection, nasal dorsum angle, columellar angle, columellar-lobule angle, nostril height ratio, nasal surface area, nasal volume) and decreased numerical values (alar width, tip/middle deviation, nasal tip angle, labial-columellar angle) compared with the preoperative morphology. The postoperative measurement showed significantly higher numerical values (nasal protrusion, tip/middle deviation, nasal dorsum angle) and lower numerical values (columellar-lobule angle, nostril height ratio, alar width ratio) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the authors' secondary cleft rhinoplasty significantly improved the underprojected, up-rotated, deviated, and poorly defined tip and short nasal bridge deformities. The technique could result in the nose of the patients with cleft lip nasal deformity being closer to that of the normative profile.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Nasal profile changes after LeFort I osteotomy (maxillary advancement) with and without ANS reduction in class III skeletal patients: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Dentofacial malformation is a common condition that affects a significant portion of the population, resulting in functional and aesthetic defects. Orthognathic surgeries, such as LeFort I osteotomy, are performed to correct these abnormalities. However, the impact of these surgeries on nasal profile changes remains unclear. Additionally, the role of anterior nasal spine (ANS) reduction in maxillary advancement surgeries of 3-5 mm range is yet to be determined. This study aims to investigate the effect of ANS reduction on soft tissue profile changes following LeFort I osteotomy with a maxillary advancement range of 3-5 mm in class III skeletal patients. The hypothesis is that the changes in nasolabial angle and upper lip length will not significantly differ between patients who undergo LeFort I osteotomy with and without ANS reduction.

METHOD AND DESIGN

This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial. A total of 26 class III skeletal patients with maxillofacial abnormalities will be recruited from the maxillofacial clinic of Bu-Ali and Farahikhtegan Hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to two groups: one group will undergo LeFort I osteotomy with ANS reduction, and the other group will undergo LeFort I osteotomy without ANS reduction. The soft tissue profile changes, specifically the nasolabial angle and upper lip length, will be evaluated and compared between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Achieving facial harmony through orthognathic surgery requires careful planning and consideration of the impact on surrounding soft tissue. The primary objective is to predict and plan for the effects on the nasolabial region. LeFort I osteotomy is a common procedure used to correct dentofacial deformities, particularly in class III patients. Maxillary advancement during this surgery can lead to changes in nasal tip position, width, and rotation, potentially due to repositioning of the anterior nasal spine and soft tissue dissection. In this study, soft tissue changes will be assessed in non-growing class III patients using cephalometric radiographs. The impact of reducing the anterior nasal spine (ANS) on nasal profile changes will be investigated for maxillary advancements of 3-5 mm. Objective measurements and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated to gain insights into the aesthetic outcomes of orthognathic surgery. The findings will provide valuable guidance for treatment decisions and alternative options based on expected nasal profile changes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This project was registered at The Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Identifier No. IRCT20210928052625N1, Website: https://www.irct.ir/trial/59171 ) and Open Science Framework (OSF) (Registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X3HD4 ). 2021-06-09.

The Effect of Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Sutures on Nasal Width Following Cinch Sutures in Orthognathic Surgery

Background: Non-absorbable materials (nylon) are always used in cinch sutures to maintain nasal width and to improve harmonious facial symmetry in orthognathic surgery. However, a few drawbacks of nylon materials have been clinically reported following orthognathic surgery, such as nasal irritation and exposure of the sutures. An absorbable material (PDS) has been proposed in cinch sutures, not only to avoid the complications of nylon but also to stabilize the nasal width for a long-term follow-up. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with Angle’s malocclusion classification III receiving orthognathic surgery were enrolled in this study. A non-absorbable material (nylon) and an absorbable material (PDS) were utilized for the cinch sutures. Pre-operative (T1) and post-operative six-month (T2) craniofacial 3D images were collected for all patients to measure the alar curvature (Ac) width and the alar base (Al) width. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied in the statistical analysis. Results: With the approval of IRB, cinch suturing was performed with nylon in 29 patients and with PDS in 28 patients. Pre-operative Ac and Al distances showed no significant difference between these two groups. There were also no significant differences between the suture materials in the peri-operative change in nasal width, including Ac (nylon: 1.999 ± 1.40; PDS: 1.484 ± 0.97; p = 0.112) and Al (nylon: 1.861 ± 1.66; PDS: 1.115 ± 0.92; p = 0.056). Conclusions: For cinch sutures in orthognathic surgery, PDS can maintain the peri-operative nasal width similarly to nylon; additionally, it can be absorbed in a timely manner without the drawbacks of non-absorbable materials.