1
|
Ahmed SH, Shekouhi R, Gerhold C, Mattia A, Azizi A, Donath G, Chim H. Contributors to post-operative venous thromboembolism risk after breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 94:106-118. [PMID: 38776625 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events are a preventable complication for patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. However, there is a lack of consistency in the existing literature regarding the potential risk factors affecting these individuals. METHODS This study aimed to investigate the potential risk factors associated with an increased risk of VTE following surgery for breast cancer. Data on patient characteristics such as age, body mass index (BMI), existing comorbidities, smoking history, surgical interventions, duration of hospitalization, and post-operative complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-one studies investigating the incidence of VTE following surgical interventions for breast cancer were included. This study included 22,155 female patients with a mean age of 50.8 ± 2.9 years. The weighted mean length of surgery and hospital stay were 382.1 ± 170.0 min and 4.5 ± 2.7 days, respectively. The patients were followed-up for a weighted mean duration of 13.8 ± 21.2 months. The total incidence of VTE events was 2.2% (n = 489). Meta-analysis showed that patients with post-operative VTE had a significantly higher mean age and BMI, as well as longer mean length of surgery (P < 0.05). Comparing the techniques of autologous breast reconstruction showed that the risk of post-operative VTE is significantly higher with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, compared with the transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps (P < 0.05). Compared with delayed reconstruction, immediate reconstruction was associated with a significantly higher incidence of VTE (P < 0.05). Smoking history, length of hospital stay, and Caprini score did not correlate with increased incidence of post-operative VTE. CONCLUSION The incidence rate of VTE events in patients receiving surgical treatment for breast cancer is 2.2%. Risk factors for developing post-operative VTE in this patient population were found to be older age, increased BMI, extended length of surgical procedures, and DIEP flap reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syeda Hoorulain Ahmed
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ramin Shekouhi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Cameron Gerhold
- College of Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | | | - Armina Azizi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Gary Donath
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Harvey Chim
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mahrhofer M, Reichert R, Siegwart LC, Russe E, Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Weitgasser L. Risk of perioperative hormonal breast cancer therapy for microvascular flap complications in breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 85:143-148. [PMID: 37487260 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone therapy with selective estrogen modulators (tamoxifen) and aromatase inhibitors is commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer. While the increased risk for thromboembolic events has been known since their early application, the potential risk in microsurgical breast reconstruction is still debated. This study aimed to evaluate the risk for microvascular flap complications in patients with perioperative hormone therapy. METHODS All patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) or transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap at our institution between March 2010 and November 2020 were retrospectively identified in our records. Patients were grouped according to the type and use of perioperative hormone therapy. Flap-related thromboembolic events, flap loss, and revision procedures were compared and analyzed between groups. Risk factors associated with postoperative microsurgical complications were determined. RESULTS A total of 560 patients (656 flaps) were included in our analysis. One hundred ninety-eight patients (224 flaps) received perioperative hormone therapy (35.4%) and 50 (8.9%) postoperative microsurgical events occurred. Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors were not associated with postoperative microsurgical events (p = 0.254), full flap loss (p = 0.702), or partial flap loss (p = 0.916). Patients receiving DIEP flaps had a higher risk for postoperative microsurgical complications (OR 2.36, p = 0.004) and partial flap loss (OR 14.66, p < 0.001). A BMI > 30 was associated with an increased risk for partial flap loss (OR 4.2; p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: This article presents one of the largest single-center datasets for the risks of hormone therapy in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Our results show that perioperative hormone therapy does not increase the risk for microsurgical complications. The findings of our study do challenge the common practice of discontinued hormone therapy before microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Mahrhofer
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Raphael Reichert
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Laura Cosima Siegwart
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Russe
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas Schoeller
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Gottfried Wechselberger
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria
| | - Laurenz Weitgasser
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Teaching Hospital of the Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perioperative Medication Management in Elective Plastic Surgery Procedures. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34:1131-1136. [PMID: 36735455 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000009183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative medication management is vital to maintain patient safety while under anesthesia, as well as to avoid postoperative complications. Plastic surgeons make daily decisions on whether to ask a patient to stop taking medication before their surgery. These important decisions can affect bleeding risk, wound healing, and interactions with anesthetics, which can range from minor to life-threatening. Current plastic surgery literature lacks a comprehensive review of perioperative medication management, with existing reports focusing on specific procedures and specific medication classes. METHODS A PubMed database search was conducted for articles through July 2021. The bibliographies of included studies were also examined for articles not acquired in the initial search queries. The authors included studies on medication usage and perioperative guidance in patients undergoing elective plastic surgery procedures. The authors excluded studies unrelated to plastic surgery and studies where the medications were used as an intervention. Abstracts, animal studies, studies involving the pediatric population, and book chapters were also excluded, as well as articles not published in English. RESULTS A total of 801 papers were identified by our search terms. After title and abstract screening, 35 papers were selected for full-text review. After full-text review, 20 papers were selected for inclusion, with an additional 6 papers from cited references added. Of the 26 papers, 6 papers discussed psychotropic drugs, 6 papers discussed medications affecting hemostasis, 4 papers discussed hormone-containing medications, 3 papers discussed antilipid medications, 2 papers discussed antihypertensive medications, 2 papers discussed herbal supplements, 1 paper discussed both psychotropic and herbal supplements, 1 paper discussed medications affecting wound healing, and 1 paper discussed rheumatologic medications. A summary of those recommendations was then compiled together. CONCLUSIONS The perioperative medication management in elective plastic surgery procedures remains a complex and multidisciplinary process. It is important to manage these patients in a case-by-case manner and to consult a specialist when necessary. Careful medication reconciliation is essential to decrease the likelihood of adverse outcomes and interactions with perioperative anesthetics.
Collapse
|
4
|
A UK consensus statement on thromboprophylaxis for autologous breast reconstruction ,. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 81:138-148. [PMID: 37141788 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Microsurgical breast reconstruction accounts for 22% of breast reconstructions in the UK. Despite thromboprophylaxis, venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in up to 4% of cases. Using a Delphi process, this study established a UK consensus on VTE prophylaxis strategy, for patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction using free-tissue transfer. It captured geographically divergent views, producing a guide that reflected the peer opinion and current evidence base. METHODS Consensus was ascertained using a structured Delphi process. A specialist from each of the UK's 12 regions was invited to the expert panel. Commitment to three to four rounds of questions was sought at enrollment. Surveys were distributed electronically. An initial qualitative free-text survey was distributed to identify likely lines of consensus and dissensus. Each panelist was provided with full-text versions of key papers on the topic. Initial free-text responses were analyzed to develop a set of structured quantitative statements, which were refined via a second survey as a consensus was approached. RESULTS The panel comprised 18 specialists: plastic surgeons and thrombosis experts from across the UK. Each specialist completed three rounds of surveys. Together, these plastic surgeons reported having performed more than 570 microsurgical breast reconstructions in the UK in 2019. A consensus was reached on 27 statements, detailing the assessment and delivery of VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to collate current practice, expert opinion from across the UK, and a literature review. The output was a practical guide for VTE prophylaxis for microsurgical breast reconstruction in any UK microsurgical breast reconstruction unit.
Collapse
|
5
|
Webster TK, Roth SC, Yu D, Baltodano PA, Araya S, Elmer NA, Kaplunov BS, Massada KE, Talemal L, Hackley M, Patel SA. Safe perioperative tamoxifen use in autologous breast free flap reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:241-251. [PMID: 35286525 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06558-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative tamoxifen remains a valuable therapeutic modality for breast cancer patients. Studies in the existing literature have suggested a potential increased risk of thrombotic complications in autologous breast free flap reconstruction patients exposed to tamoxifen perioperatively. However, several recent publications have questioned the validity of these associations. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic appraisal of the existing literature to determine if perioperative tamoxifen exposure increases the risk of flap complications in autologous breast-free flap reconstruction patients. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, EBSCOHost, ClinicalTrials.gov, and TRIP databases from their inception up to April 2021. Articles analyzing the impact of perioperative tamoxifen in autologous breast free flap patients were included. The outcomes assessed were total flap loss, overall flap complications, thrombotic flap complications, which was defined as the sum of arterial and venous flap thrombi, and systemic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Pooled estimates and relative risk were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS 9294 Articles were screened and 7 were selected for analysis, which included 3669 flaps in 2759 patients. Compared to patients who did not receive tamoxifen perioperatively, those who received tamoxifen did not have an increased risk of thrombotic flap complications (pooled RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.61-1.84), total flap loss (pooled RR 2.17; 95% CI 0.79-5.95), overall flap complications (pooled RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.76-1.41), or systemic VTE (pooled RR 1.93; 95% CI 0.72-5.13). The heterogeneity of the studies was not significant for any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this study was to update the current understanding of the impact of perioperative tamoxifen on autologous breast free flap reconstruction outcomes. The existing literature supports that the perioperative continuation of tamoxifen in breast free flap patients is not associated with an increased risk of thrombotic flap complications, total flap loss, overall flap complications, or systemic VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa K Webster
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephanie C Roth
- Biomedical and Research Services, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daohai Yu
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pablo A Baltodano
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sthefano Araya
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas A Elmer
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Briana S Kaplunov
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Karen E Massada
- Department of General Surgery, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lindsay Talemal
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Madison Hackley
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sameer A Patel
- Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|