Correction of secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity in adults using lower lateral cartilage repositioning, columellar strut, and onlay cartilage graft on the nasal tip with open rhinoplasty combined with reverse-U incision

Autologous Rib Cartilage Reconstruction After Silicone Implant Removal in a Patient With Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Case Report

Cleft lip rhinoplasty (CLR) corrects nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients. However, limitations exist in some countries like Japan regarding the use of silicone implants for CLR. While historical reports mention their use since the 1980s, long-term data is lacking. This case report describes a 53-year-old Japanese woman with bilateral cleft lip and palate who received a CLR with a silicone implant over 30 years ago. The implant calcified, causing nasal dorsum skin hardening and thinning, raising concerns of extrusion. To prevent potential extrusion, the implant was removed and replaced with autologous seventh rib cartilage grafts. Various grafting techniques were used for basal support, dorsal augmentation, and nasal tip refinement. The postoperative evaluation showed excellent results with no complications. This case highlights the importance of long-term follow-up after CLR with silicone implants and advocates for autologous rib cartilage as a reliable alternative. Reporting such cases is crucial for informing patient management and research on the long-term safety of silicone implants in CLR.

Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty remains a challenging operation that requires an understanding of the aberrant anatomy in cleft lip nasal deformity as well as the ability to adapt various techniques suited to the needs of each patient. In this article, we review some of the classically described approaches in cleft rhinoplasty and different strategies to address the nasal subunits. Presurgical adjuncts, surgical interventions before facial skeletal maturity, and patient reported outcome measures are also discussed.

The Effectiveness of Releasing the Lower Lateral Cartilage Through Intranasal Z-plasty Incision on the Vestibular Web During Secondary Correction of Nasal Deformities in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

The primary goal in the secondary correction of unilateral cleft lip nose deformity is to achieve symmetry of the nose and nostril. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of freeing the lower lateral cartilage from the pyriform ligament through an intranasal Z-plasty incision on the vestibular web in adult patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Thirty-six patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, who underwent open rhinoplasty between August 2014 and December 2021, were identified retrospectively. Five parameters for nose form and nostril symmetry were measured on basal views through 2-dimensional photographic analysis. The patients were divided into subgroups with or without septoplasty. Cleft-to-non-cleft ratios between the Z (13 patients) and non-Z groups (23 patients) were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The mean follow-up was 12.9 months (6-31 mo). In the Z group, there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative values for nostril angulation, regardless of septoplasty (all P <0.05). Despite septoplasty, significant differences in the postoperative changes in nostril angulation were found between the Z and non-Z groups (all P <0.05). Intranasal Z-plasty on the plica vestibularis is an effective technique for releasing the lower lateral cartilage, improving the nostril asymmetry in cleft lip nose deformity.

Balancing the Anteroposterior Diameters of the Nostril Lengths in Cleft Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Osteocartilaginous deformities in cleft rhinoplasties may be restored with numerous techniques. However, the anteroposterior (AP) diameter lengths of the nostrils may still be unequal and should also be addressed. A technique was designed to balance nostril AP diameter lengths and apical shapes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Balance between AP nostril diameters was accomplished by reduction of the AP diameter of the nostril at the non-cleft side by medial crural reduction and augmentation of the AP diameter of the nostril at the cleft side by three-parted mini-flap reconstruction at the soft triangle. The cleft-side AP diameter length was divided by the non-cleft-side AP diameter length of the same preoperative, per-operative and 1-year postoperative base view photographs of each patient, and "nostril balancing ratio" was obtained. The more this ratio was near to "one," the more the AP nostril diameters were equal.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight unilateral-cleft rhinoplasty were performed between January/2019 and May/2022. Forty-two of them required nostril AP diameter equalization. Twenty-nine patients were female, thirteen were male. Thirty-three of them were operated for a primary cleft rhinoplasty. Nine of them for secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Mean age was 28 years (22-39 years). Mean follow-up was 25 months (6-40 months). The preoperative, per-operative and postoperative mean "nostril balancing ratios" were 0.714 (0.621-0.813), 0.743 (0.721-0.752) and 0.971 (0.943-0.976), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Balancing AP diameter symmetry with MCO at the non-cleft side and three-parted mini skin flap reconstruction at the cleft side may provide the satisfactory results. Three mini-flaps at the soft triangle may remold the nostril apex in an oval shape, which may result in a better shape symmetry.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Autologous Costal Cartilage With Expanded Polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) Implants for the Treatment of Nasal Deformity After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

OBJECTIVE

To repair and reconstruct the secondary nasal deformity after unilateral cleft lip repair, we used autologous costal cartilage and expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) to get a better nasal shape.

METHOD

Nineteen patients with nasal deformity after unilateral cleft lip repair were treated from July 2018 to July 2021. During the operation, autologous costal cartilage was carved and formed and then implanted into the nasal tip and nasal columella, while the back of the nose was raised with ePTFE.

RESULT

Nineteen cases were followed up for 6 to 30 months. No transplanted cartilage and swelling were exposed or discharged. The appearance was good, and the patients were satisfied.

CONCLUSION

Autologous costal cartilage combined with ePTFE is an ideal treatment for nasal deformity after cleft lip repair.

Outcomes of Open Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Patients using Photogrammetric Analysis - An Evaluative Study

Introduction

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty is a challenge due to the complex anatomy of the nose, with structural deformity and difficulty in surgical management. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an anatomical-based approach on enhancing tip and alar symmetry in secondary unilateral cleft rhinoplasty using photogrammetric evaluation.

Methods

The study was conducted on 57 adult patients seeking rhinoplasty after primary repair of congenital unilateral cleft lip deformity. All patients were operated upon using an external open rhinoplasty approach using an anatomical-based surgical technique. The cases were periodically followed up at three, six, 12 and 18 months for both aesthetic and functional outcomes with photogrammetric analysis of facial profile using the software Mirror Suite programme to compare before and after the surgical procedure.

Results

The photogrammetric analysis showed a significant improvement of facial angles (P = 0.05). The nasofrontal angle changed from a median of 146° to 132.5°, nasolabial angle of 73° to 95°, nasofacial angle of 21.5° to 32° and nasomental angle of 105° to 130°. The rotation angle of the nasal tip showed a significant cephalic rotation with a mean increase of the tip elongation of 1.8 cm achieved per lateralised millimetre.

Discussion

Secondary rhinoplasty in unilateral cleft deformities needs accurate evaluation of the anatomical and pathological abnormalities. Open approach is preferred with using costal cartilage graft allowing adequate columellar lengthening, maxillary enhancement and alar repositioning which leads to optimise the definition, projection and cephalic rotation with better stabilisation and symmetry of the nasal tip.

Frequency, Indications and Intraoperative Dynamics of Repositioning of the Lateral Crura of the Lower Lateral Cartilage: A 35-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Lower lateral cartilage repositioning (LLCR) is an effective technique that places the lateral crus in a newly created caudal pocket, and is utilized for a variety of indications including cephalic malposition, alar asymmetries and tip rotation/projection alteration. However, there is a relative sparsity in the literature regarding this procedure and the dynamic changes that it produces. In this study, we report our experience with LLCR in regard to its indications and related interplays.

METHODS

Data from our institution were collected from the most recent 100 primary rhinoplasties, most recent 100 secondary rhinoplasties and all LLCRs performed. For each LLCR, patient demographics and concurrent surgical techniques were compiled. A descriptive analysis was performed for all cohorts, while Fischer's exact test was performed to compare the associations of categorical data for the respective sample sizes of the primary and secondary rhinoplasty cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 127 patients underwent LLCR, with eleven (11%) LLCRs in the primary rhinoplasty cohort and twelve (12%) LLCRs in the secondary rhinoplasty cohort. The most common indication for LLCR was cephalic malposition, followed by over-projection and asymmetry of the lower lateral cartilages. Intraoperative observation of dynamic changes included invariable cephalic rotation of the tip, ability to precisely control the tip projection, drastic narrowing of the domal arch often minimizing the need for the transdomal suture, alar repositioning caudally, correction of alar retraction and more elegant tip definition. However, the external valve lost its strength on majority of LLCR patients, which required almost routine use of Gunter lateral crus strut.

CONCLUSION

LLCR is a powerful and versatile tool that can be utilized in either primary or secondary rhinoplasty. Its transposition results in cephalic rotation of the tip, narrowing of the domal arch, caudal reposition of the alar rim and superior tip definition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266.

The Effect of Arch Cartilage Graft and Tajima Reverse U Approach in the Secondary Reconstruction of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

ABSTRACT

Secondary cleft lip nasal deformity is complicated with wide spectrum of defect and varied reconstructive procedures. There has been no unanimous solution for a given problem. In case of a localized alar depression in unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity, the conchal cartilage applied as arch graft was proposed. Patients were recruited from database of craniofacial center who received Tajima method and arch cartilage graft. Inclusion criteria were patients with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity after skeletal maturity. Through a reverse U incision, the lower lateral cartilage was dissected and released from the skin and the contralateral cartilage. The harvested conchal cartilage graft was trimmed to 25 to 30 by 8 mm in size, and inserted as arch shape overlying the cleft side lower lateral cartilage. Transdomal fixation sutures were made. Outcome assessment was performed, and the nostril and alar dimensions were measured. Thirty-nine patients were eligible for evaluation of the surgical outcome. Majority of patients underwent simultaneous lip revision (97%). No surgery-related complications were noted in this series. Satisfaction to the nasal reconstruction was reported in 85% of patients. Further minor nasal revisions were performed in 6 patients (15%). Quantitative measurement showed statistically significant improvement in nostril height, alar height and alar width after the surgery. It is concluded that the Tajima reverse U approach plus arch cartilage graft is an effective method for secondary reconstruction of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity in selected patients presenting with cleft side alar depression.