Harvesting the anterolateral thigh flap with non-sizable perforators

Split Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A New Classification of Anatomical Variants and a Surgical Planning Algorithm

BACKGROUND

 Split anterolateral thigh flap is a versatile reconstruction option, yet long underestimated as no practical perforator classification and no optimal strategy were present. Harvesting "capillary nonsizable perforators" could potentially expand flap splits to those with no existing multiple sizable perforators. Concerns over defect characteristics, recipient vessels, pedicle length, and split timing should all be weighted equally in designing the suitable flap. Refinement is thus required to enable precise reconstructions.

METHODS

 All patients undergoing anterolateral thigh flap harvests between 2014 and 2021 performed by a single surgeon were included. The perforator patterns of sizable pedicle, course, origin, and further successful flap-split methods were documented. Surgical outcome of flap survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

 Anatomical variants of 134 (48.4%) dual, 123 (44.4%) single, and 20 (7.2%) no sizable perforators were found in a total of 277 anterolateral thigh flaps. The overall flap survival rate was 97.5%. Flap split was performed in 82 flaps, including 29 single and 5 no sizable perforator cases previously considered "unsplittable," by utilizing a series of direct skin paddle split, capillary nonsizable perforators harvesting, and flow-through anastomosis technique. Comparable flap survivals were found between split and nonsplit flaps as well as between split segments supplied by sizable and capillary nonsizable perforators. Primary closure was achieved in 98.9% of the thigh donor sites.

CONCLUSION

 A new classification of the common anterolateral thigh flap anatomical variants was proposed and a comprehensive algorithm of split flap strategy was developed along with the innovative "fabricate" concept.

Principles and Clinical Application of Free-Style Capillary Perforator-Based Flap for Coverage of Facial Skin Cancer Defects

This study introduces a free-style perforator based island flap (PBIF) for the reconstruction of skin defects. From March 2012 to December 2022, a retrospective investigation was conducted on patients who underwent reconstruction for facial defects due to skin cancer. Data on the patients' gender, age, anesthesia method, diagnosis, defect location, flap size, complications, and follow-up periods were collected. There are several principles for designing the PBIF: finger-pinching method, alignment with the direction of wrinkles, the smaller width and longer length of the flap, and proximal attachment to the muscle. A total of 32 patients were included, with an average age of 63.6 years. Surgeries were performed in various regions, such as the infraorbital area, nose, cheek, philtrum, and the anterior/posterior/inferior auricular regions, with an average flap size of 7.63 cm2. There were no complications, such as venous congestion or vascular insufficiency in the skin flaps, although one case required revisional closure due to flap disruption. The PBIF is a useful and effective method for the restoration of facial defects. This method can provide simple yet aesthetically satisfying results, showing stable outcomes without complex surgeries or complications. This study indicates the potential for this method to be more widely employed in reconstructive surgeries in the future.

Surface to Perforator Index: Assessing the Importance of the Number of Perforators in Successful Harvesting of the Anterolateral Thigh Flap

BACKGROUND

 The use of perforator flaps has become more popular with improvement of surgical technique, technology, as well as understanding of microvascular anatomy. The selection of well-perfused angiosomes is critical to the successful outcome of patients undergoing free tissue transfer. The number of perforators that are needed is dependent upon the surface area of the flap being harvested; however, there have been no studies to assess the optimal surface area supplied by each perforator. We hypothesized that the smaller the surface area supplied by each perforator correlated with fewer flap-related complications in the harvesting of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap.

METHODS

 All ALT flaps harvested from 2015 to 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The surface area of the flap harvested was calculated as A = πab, where a is the long radius and b is the short radius of the ellipse. The surface-perforator index (SPI) was calculated for each flap by dividing the surface area of the ALT flap by the number of perforators supplying the flap. Our primary outcomes were flap-related complications that included: partial flap loss, dehiscence, and venous congestion.

RESULTS

 A total of 106 patients were identified. Twenty-four patients (22.6%) developed perforator-related complications. An increasing SPI and SPI to body surface area were strongly associated with development of complications (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], adjusted p: 1.02 [1.01, 1.03], < 0.001and 1.23 [1.12, 1.42], p < 0.001). An SPI of greater than 150 cm2/perforator was associated with a higher probability of complications (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Flap-related complications are significantly related to the number of perforators supplying the flap. The smaller the surface area supplied by a single perforator correlates with significantly fewer flap-related complications. SPI is a new index that may be used as a predictive tool to aid in identifying flaps that may be more prone to complications in free tissue transfer.

Pushing the Limits of Reach for the Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap

The pedicled anterolateral thigh flap, although tremendously versatile, may be limited in reach, especially in challenging clinical cases. Traditional methods to extend its reach may remain insufficient or unavailable. We describe two modifications to the conventional pedicled flap to extend its reach to the limits, namely (1) selecting a distal perforator supplemented by the nonsizeable perforator harvest technique, and (2) the double-pivot technique adding an additional rotation to the flap à la propeller perforator flap. The increased reach not only improves reconstructive success, but also opens up new applications for this workhorse flap.

Improving the visualisation of perforator arteries for anterolateral thigh flaps harvest in CT angiography via sublingual glyceryl trinitrate

AIM

To investigate the improvement of image quality and visualisation of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap perforators on computed tomography angiography (CTA) after administration of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with oral lesions received thigh CTA examinations were divided randomly into two groups after administration of sublingual GTN (GTN group) or without administration of sublingual GTN (non-GTN group). Two radiologists calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and assessed the image quality of each vessel. Besides, the grade of thigh artery, the lumen diameter of deep femoral artery, lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA), the descending branch of LCFA and its proximal and distal perforators, and the number and type of visible perforators were evaluated quantitatively.

RESULTS

The SNR and CNR were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). The image quality of CTA in the GTN group was significantly better than that in the non-GTN group (p<0.01). The lumen diameters of the deep femoral artery, LCFA, the descending branch of LCFA and its perforators were significantly larger in the GTN group than those in the non-GTN group (p<0.01). Compared with the non-GTN group, the number of visible perforators and the number of visible septocutaneous perforators were significantly more in the GTN group, and the qualitative grade of visible perforators was significantly higher (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of sublingual GTN in preoperative thigh CTA can improve the image quality and visualisation of perforator vessels, thus could help surgeons to select the optimum ALT flaps.

Abdominal Wall Skin Loss Defects Reconstruction Using Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap

It was extremely difficult to deal with the complex full-thickness abdominal wall defect post serious trauma. The pedicled anterolateral thigh flap had been reported to be applied in reconstructing full-thickness abdominal wall defect in lower abdomen and groin. However, less cases in upper abdominal wall defect reconstructed by anterolateral thigh flap were reported due to some limitations. The aim of this study was to introduce our experiences in applying anterolateral thigh flap in upper abdominal wall defect reconstructing. In this study, seven patients with a large area of upper full-thickness defect in abdominal wall complicated with multiple organ damage were retrospectively identified due to acute trauma. Immediate organ-repair surgeries were performed. Meanwhile, the patients underwent complete debridement in the zone of abdominal wall defect, together with anti-infective treatment. Then, the appropriate timing was chosen to perform pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for reconstructing large area of full-thickness defect involving the upper abdomen. Postoperative follow-up data demonstrated that all the flaps survived, with no hernia complications or other discomforts. The outcome of the patients was also good. Thus, we conclude that pedicled anterolateral thigh flap was feasible to repair full-thickness defect in upper abdominal wall as long as well designed.