Combining an end to side nerve to masseter transfer with cross face nerve graft for functional upgrade in partial facial paralysis-an observational cohort study

[Anatomical Identification and Possibilities of Transfer of the Masseteric Nerve for Facial Reanimation]

BACKGROUND

The masseteric nerve (MN) is often used as a donor nerve for facial reanimation. In addition to already established techniques, MN transfer is rapidly gaining importance, mainly due to the single-stage approach of the procedure and its reconstructive potential. This anatomical study and the associated questionnaire study aimed to evaluate the established methods for identification of the MN and its suitability for direct nerve transfer as well as to assess the importance of MN transfer in the daily clinical routine.

MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY

Bilateral dissection of 25 fresh-frozen head specimens (n=50; 13 female, 12 male) was performed with accompanying measurement of the MN. In a questionnaire study conducted at established centres for facial surgery in German-speaking countries, clinical experience data of MN transfer was collected using the SurveyMonkey software. The data obtained was statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel and presented in numerical tables and boxplots.

RESULTS

Using anatomical landmarks such as the zygomatic arch and the mandibular notch for orientation, the MN was found in 100% of cases. Its average length from the emerging point below the zygomatic arch towards its entry into the masseter muscle was measured to be 22 mm and was the length available for nerve transposition. Tension-free coaptation of the MN with the zygomatic branch was possible in 94% of cases. The questionnaire showed that the MN is considered an important donor nerve for motor nerve transfers and that MN transfer is now largely established as a standard procedure.

DISCUSSION

In accordance with previously published studies, the MN was reliably found at the height of the mandibular notch and, in the vast majority of cases, was suitable for tension-free coaptation with the zygomatic branch. Differences to the existing literature, however, can be seen in the length of the nerve available for nerve transposition and the frequency of its division into several branches before entering the masseter muscle. In German-speaking countries, Cross-Face Nerve Grafting (CFNG) is still the preferred method for facial reanimation surgery. However, MN transfer is also well established by now, both as an alternative and a supplement to other techniques, possibly due to its low donor site morbidity and short time to regeneration.

Cross-Facial Nerve Grafting Used Independently in Facial Reanimation: A Narrative Review

Importance: Cross-Facial Nerve Grafting (CFNG) for facial palsy offers potential to restore spontaneous facial expression, but specific indications and associated outcomes are limited. Updates to this technique have aided in its successful employment in select cases. This review aims to explore the context in which CFNG has been successfully utilized as a primary modality. Observations: Literature review was performed auditing all studies investigating CFNG as a primary modality, which reported outcomes. A total of 326 cases reporting outcomes for primary CFNG were included. Eye closure outcomes were 83.3% successful at ages 0-18, 77.3% successful at ages 19-40, and 57.1% successful at ages 41+. Smile outcomes were 73.7% successful at ages 0-18, 81.5% successful at ages 19-40, and 52.8% successful at ages 41+. For synkinesis, 89% of cases were considered successful; 100% successful at ages 0-18, and 78.4% successful in adults. Conclusions and Relevance: CFNG may offer return of spontaneous facial function in select cases. Higher percentages of successful outcomes are observed in younger patients, when performed in two stages, and when performed earlier from the onset of FP in cases of eye closure restoration. In the modern era, CFNG has been more commonly employed as an adjunctive procedure to other reanimation techniques.

Does supercharging with cross-face nerve graft enhance smile in non-flaccid facial paralysis patients undergoing selective neurectomy?

BACKGROUND

Cross face nerve grafting (CFNG) is a well-established nerve transfer technique in facial reanimation; however, no study has assessed outcome of supercharging the smile with CFNG in patients with synkinesis. The goal of this study was to examine the smile outcome in non-flaccid facial paralysis (NFFP) patients after supercharging with CFNG during selective neurectomy.

METHODS

NFFP patients who underwent CFNG with end-to-side coaptation to a smile branch on the paralyzed side during selective neurectomy were retrospectively identified and their charts were reviewed. Pre-operative and post-operative facial function was assessed with the electronic clinician-graded facial function tool (eFACE), and an automated computer-aided facial assessment tool (Emotrics). Smile metrics were compared pre-operatively, in early post-operative time (EPO, <6 months), and late post-operative time (LPO, >9 months) when CFNG contribution would be expected.

RESULTS

Thirteen cases were performed between June 2019 and December 2021. No objective smile metrics improved following supercharging with CFNG. Oral commissure excursion improved by 1.23 points in eFACE (p = .812), and by 0.84 in Emotrtics (p = .187) from EPO to LPO. EFACE dynamic score was improved by 0.08 points from EPO to LPO (p = .969).

CONCLUSIONS

Using CFNG for supercharging the smile during selective neurectomy in NFFP patients may not enhance smile. Longer term results following supercharging and long term natural history of selective neurectomy should be assessed.

Modified Urethral Graciloplasty Cross-Innervated by the Pudendal Nerve for Postprostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: Cadaveric Simulation Surgery and a Clinical Case Report

An artificial sphincter implanted in the bulbous urethra to treat severe postprostatectomy urinary incontinence is effective, but embedding-associated complications can occur. We assessed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of urethral graciloplasty cross-innervated by the pudendal nerve. A simulation surgery on three male fresh cadavers was performed. Both ends of the gracilis muscle were isolated only on its vascular pedicle with proximal end of the obturator nerve severed and transferred to the perineum. We examined whether the gracilis muscle could be wrapped around the bulbous urethra and whether the obturator nerve was long enough to suture with the pudendal nerve. In addition, surgery was performed on a 71-year-old male patient with severe urinary incontinence. The postoperative 12-month outcomes were assessed using a 24-hour pad test and urodynamic study. In all cadaveric simulations, the gracilis muscles could be wrapped around the bulbous urethra in a γ-loop configuration. The length of the obturator nerve was sufficient for neurorrhaphy with the pudendal nerve. In the clinical case, the postoperative course was uneventful. The mean maximum urethral closure pressure and functional profile length increased from 40.7 to 70 cm H 2 O and from 40.1 to 45.3 mm, respectively. Although urinary incontinence was not completely cured, the patient was able to maintain urinary continence at night. Urethral graciloplasty cross-innervated by the pudendal nerve is effective in raising the urethral pressure and reducing urinary incontinence.

Nerve guide conduits, nerve transfers, and local and free muscle transfer in facial nerve palsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent literature on reinnervation options in the management of facial nerve paralysis using nerve conduits, and nerve and muscle transfers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Engineering of natural and synthetic nerve conduits has progressed and many of these products are now available on the market. The use of the masseter nerve has become more popular recently as a choice in nerve transfer procedures due to various unique advantages. Various authors have recently described mimetic muscle reinnervation using more than one nerve transfer, as well as dual and triple innervation of free muscle transfer.

SUMMARY

The ideal nerve conduit continues to be elusive, however significant progress has been made with many natural and synthetic materials and designs tested and introduced on the market. Many authors have modified the classic approaches in motor nerve transfer, as well as local and free muscle transfer, and described new ones, that aim to combine their advantages, particularly the simplification to a single stage and use of multiple reinnervation to the mimetic muscles. These advances are valuable to the reconstructive surgeon as powerful tools that can be tailored to the unique challenges of patients with facial nerve palsy looking for dynamic reanimation options.

Extra- and intramuscular innervation of the masseter: Implications for facial reanimation

PURPOSE

Irreversible facial paralysis results in significant functional impairment. The motor nerve to the masseter is a reconstructive option, but despite its clinical importance, there are few parametric anatomic studies of the masseteric nerve. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extra- and intramuscular innervation of the masseter in 3D to determine the relationship of the nerve to the muscle heads and identify landmarks to aid identification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The nerve was dissected throughout its entire course in eight formalin-embalmed cadaveric specimens (mean age 84.9 ± 12.2 years). The nerve was digitized at 1-2 mm intervals using a MicroScribe™ digitizer and modeled in 3D in Autodesk® Maya®.

RESULTS

Two or three extramuscular nerves were found to enter the deep head (DH) of the masseter: one main "primary" nerve (n = 8) and one (n = 4) or two (n = 4) smaller primary nerve(s). The main primary nerve supplied both the deep and superficial heads, whereas the smaller primary nerve(s) only supplied the DH. Surgical landmarks for masseter nerve localization were quantified.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive mapping of the innervation of the masseter muscle throughout its volume revealed neural partitioning that could provide a basis for safety planning for muscle flaps and donor nerve identification and explain why masseter functional loss is not incurred by donor nerve sacrifice. Quantified landmarks correlate to previous studies and support the constant anatomy of this nerve. Our results provide a basis to optimize surgical approaches for donor nerve and muscle flap surgery.

Donor nerve selection in free gracilis muscle transfer for facial reanimation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

One of the critical factors in facial reanimation is selecting the donor nerve. The most favored neurotizers are the contralateral facial nerve with a cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) and motor nerve to the masseter (MNM). A relatively new dual innervation (DI) method has shown successful results. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of different neurotization strategies for free gracilis muscle transfer (FGMT).

METHODS

The Scopus and WoS databases were queried with 21 keywords. Three-stage article selection was performed for the systematic review. Articles presenting quantitative data for commissure excursion and facial symmetry were included in meta-analysis, using random-effects model. ROBINS-I tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess bias and study quality.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven articles containing FGMT were systematically reviewed. Most studies indicated CFNG as the first choice. MNM was primarily indicated in bilateral palsy and in elderly. Clinical outcomes of DI studies were promising. 13 studies including 435 observations (179 CFNG, 182 MNM, 74 DI) were eligible for meta-analysis. The mean change in commissure excursion was 7.15 mm (95% CI: 4.57-9.72) for CFNG, 8.46 mm (95% CI: 6.86-10.06) for MNM, and 5.18 mm (95% CI: 4.01-6.34) for DI. In pairwise comparisons, a significant difference was found between MNM and DI (p = 0.0011), despite the superior outcomes described in DI studies. No statistically significant difference was found in resting and smile symmetry (p = 0.625, p = 0.780).

CONCLUSIONS

CFNG is the most preferred neurotizer, and MNM is a reliable second option. Outcomes of DI studies are promising, but more comparison studies are needed to draw conclusions. Our meta-analysis was limited by incompatibility of the assessment scales. Consensus on a standardized assessment system would add value to future studies.

A Comprehensive Approach to Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To create a systematic overview of the available reconstructive techniques, facial nerve grading scales, physical evaluation, the reversibility of paralysis, non-reconstructive procedures and medical therapy, physical therapy, the psychological aspect of facial paralysis, and the prevention of facial nerve injury in order to elucidate the gaps in the knowledge and discuss potential research aims in this area. A further aim was to propose an algorithm simplifying the selection of reconstructive strategies, given the variety of available reconstructive methods and the abundance of factors influencing the selection. Methodological approach: A total of 2439 papers were retrieved from the Medline/Pubmed and Cochrane databases and Google Scholar. Additional research added 21 articles. The primary selection had no limitations regarding the publication date. We considered only papers written in English. Single-case reports were excluded. Screening for duplicates and their removal resulted in a total of 1980 articles. Subsequently, we excluded 778 articles due to the language and study design. The titles or abstracts of 1068 articles were screened, and 134 papers not meeting any exclusion criterion were obtained. After a full-text evaluation, we excluded 15 papers due to the lack of information on preoperative facial nerve function and the follow-up period. This led to the inclusion of 119 articles. Conclusions: A thorough clinical examination supported by advanced imaging modalities and electromyographic examination provides sufficient information to determine the cause of facial palsy. Considering the abundance of facial nerve grading scales, there is an evident need for clear guidelines regarding which scale is recommended, as well as when the postoperative evaluation should be carried out. Static procedures allow the restoral of facial symmetry at rest, whereas dynamic reanimation aims to restore facial movement. The modern approach to facial paralysis involves neurotization procedures (nerve transfers and cross-facial nerve grafts), muscle transpositions, and microsurgical free muscle transfers. Rehabilitation provides patients with the possibility of effectively controlling their symptoms and improving their facial function, even in cases of longstanding paresis. Considering the mental health problems and significant social impediments, more attention should be devoted to the role of psychological interventions. Given that each technique has its advantages and pitfalls, the selection of the treatment approach should be individualized in the case of each patient.