Pretibial lacerations among elderly patients: A province-wide study from Kymenlaakso, Finland, 2015-2019

Bumping to a rollator walker: How pretibial hematomas create more costs than pretibial lacerations

Pretibial lacerations (PL) and pretibial hematomas (PH) are debilitating traumas among the elderly and infirm. The injuries are frequently grouped together despite differences in treatment and symptoms. Patients are known to have multiple contacts in health care, perhaps because of inadequate treatment. Despite the burden, financial costs have not been assessed. Calculate and compare the treatment costs of PLs and PHs for differences and provide economic incentives to treat and diagnose patients optimally. From linkage to ICD10 diagnoses, we analysed NordDRG product invoices generated by the treatment of the patients. We calculated and compared the costs of treatment in both cohorts from the invoices. This method has not been previously used for analysing wound care costs. Mean treatment costs were 1800€ (PL) and 3300€ (PH). The total costs, emergency room, surgical treatment, and inpatient care of PHs were higher than PLs (P = .0486, P = .0002, P = .0058, P = .6526). PLs generate more costs from the outpatient clinic but were not statistically significant (P = .6533). PHs cause a higher economic burden than PLs. Costs arise from repeat ER visits and the need for surgeries because of delayed treatment. PLs have multiple contacts in the wound clinic. Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of both injuries is needed.

Pretibial lacerations

Patients with pretibial lacerations are commonly referred to plastic surgery services for operative intervention. However, the vast majority of cases can be managed conservatively. Through understanding the epidemiology and pathophysiology underlying these injuries to appropriately assessing and managing these patients, this review demonstrates how best to facilitate wound healing and undertake conservative management. A multidisciplinary approach to managing patients with pretibial lacerations is discussed so that clinicians can provide a better quality of life for patients through optimisation and preventing further decline.

Pretibial hematomas – a real-world single centre study

We analyzed treatment, outcome, and risk factors for skin necrosis of 60 patients aged ≥65 years treated for a pretibial hematoma in the province of Kymenlaakso, Finland, between 2015 and 2019. Reviewing patients’ medical records revealed two cohorts with distinct trajectories in outcome. By comparing the cohorts, we were able to discover factors associated with the prognosis for generating skin necrosis and the need for operative treatment.

Thirty-five (58.3%) patients healed without any management, and 25 (41.7%) patients were treated with hematoma evacuation, mostly for having generated skin necrosis (72%). Among operatively treated patients’ descriptions, such as “parchment skin” and “poor skin quality” were observed frequently (80%) in the medical records. This pathology, dermatoporosis, was statistically significant (p<0.0001) among patients with a complicated outcome of a pretibial hematoma. In addition to dermatoporosis, patients with hematoma evacuation were more fragile having a higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.005), a greater need for a walking aid (p = 0.0002), and overall compromised independency (p = 0.033). Hospitalization and rehabilitation were prolonged in the operatively treated cohort, 6.4 days vs. 2 days, respectively.

We recorded a delay in the diagnosis and hematoma evacuation (mean 6, range 0–51 days). In addition, six (10%) patients were misdiagnosed for having erysipelas or deep vein thrombosis indicating that pretibial hematomas are not recognized. Skin quality should be documented, and prompt surgical hematoma evacuation should be executed in fragile patients with dermatoporosis. This could prevent skin necrosis and the further need of wound care or surgical care, long hospitalization, and rehabilitation periods.