Utility of autologous fibrin glue in the donor site of free abdominal flap for breast reconstruction: A randomized controlled study

Open-Y technique for the internal mammary vein in the free abdominal flap of unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In microvascular breast reconstruction, the internal mammary vein (IMV) has emerged as the most common recipient vein. The open-Y technique can increase the vessel diameter via the bifurcation site. This study aimed to investigate the open-Y technique for IMV.

METHODS

The characteristics and details of the operative procedure in patients who had undergone unilateral breast reconstruction with and without the open-Y approach for the free abdominal flap were compared. Differences in IMV anastomosis site (the bifurcation of the main duct or that of the perforator branch) were also compared in patients with the open-Y technique. The open-Y technique was performed on the IMV side.

RESULTS

The open-Y and conventional groups included 127 and 62 patients, respectively. The main duct diameter of IMV was significantly smaller (median 2.5 vs. 3.0 mm, P < 0.001), and the rate of right-sided anastomosis (47.2 vs. 82.3%, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the open-Y group. When comparing the main duct and perforator groups, the branch diameter (1.8 vs. 1.0 mm, P < 0.001) and the diameter after the open-Y technique (5.0 vs. 3.9 mm, P < 0.001) were significantly higher, and the angle of bifurcation (45° vs. 60°, P = 0.007) was significantly lower in the main duct group.

CONCLUSIONS

Given a small venous diameter, the open-Y technique is superior, especially for left-sided breast reconstruction. Owing to the lower angle of bifurcation and large diameter, the open-Y technique at the main duct bifurcation of IMV causes less turbulence in the blood flow.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The open-Y technique is especially effective for left-sided breast reconstruction. Considering the lower angle of bifurcation and large diameter, the open-Y technique at the main duct bifurcation of the internal mammary vein causes less turbulence in the blood flow.

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

For preference sensitive treatments, such as breast reconstructions, there are barriers to conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary aims of this systematic review were to investigate what type of research questions are explored by RCTs in breast reconstruction, where have they been performed and where have they been published, and to thematise the research questions and thus create an overview of the state of the research field.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials investigating any aspect of breast reconstructions were included. The PubMed database was searched with a pre-defined search string. Inclusion and data abstraction was performed in a pre-defined standardised fashion. For the purpose of this study, we defined key issues as comparison of categories of breast reconstruction and comparison of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction, when the thematisation was done.

RESULTS

A total of 419 abstracts were retrieved from the search. Of the 419, 310 were excluded as they were not RCTs concerning some aspect of breast reconstruction, which left us with 110 abstracts to be included in the study. The research questions of the included studies could more or less be divided into seven different themes inclusive of 2 key issues: Other issues - comparison of different categories of breast reconstruction, comparison of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction, surgical details within a category of breast reconstruction, surgical details valid for several categories of breast reconstruction, donor site management, anaesthetics, and non-surgical details. Only five studies compared key issues, and they all illustrate the challenges with RCTs in breast reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 110 publications based on RCTs in breast reconstruction have been published. Seven themes of research questions could be identified. Only five studies have explored the key issues. Better scientific evidence is needed for the key issues in breast reconstruction, for example by implementing a new study design in the field.

A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps

BACKGROUND

Abdominally based free flaps are commonly used in breast reconstruction. A frequent complication is venous congestion, which might contribute to around 40% of flap failures. One way to deal with it is venous supercharging. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the scientific evidence for the effects of venous supercharging.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane library. The included articles were critically appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included. Most studies had serious study limitations and problems with directness. Three studies report 'routine' use of venous supercharging and performed it prophylactically in patients who did not have clinical signs of venous congestion. Seventeen studies report on flap complications, of which one is a randomised controlled trial demonstrating statistically significant lower complication rates in the intervention group. The overall certainty of evidence for the effect of a venous supercharging on flap complications, length of hospital stay and operative time, in patients without clinical signs of venous congestion, is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝), and low on and surgical takebacks (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝). Twenty-one studies presented data on strategies and overall certainty of evidence for using radiological findings, preoperative measurements, and clinical risk factors to make decisions on venous supercharging is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊝ ⊝ ⊝).

CONCLUSION

There is little scientific evidence for how to predict in which cases, without clinical signs of venous congestion, venous supercharging should be performed. The complication rate might be lower in patients in which a prophylactic venous anastomosis has been performed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022353591).

Utility of the intraflap perfusion procedure for abdominal free flap in unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Heparin prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism can be used in microsurgery. If vein anastomosis is performed before the artery, heparin irrigation into the artery can be performed locally without systematic effect. This study aimed to introduce this "intraflap perfusion procedure" in autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS

Among the 220 patients with unilateral breast cancer who had received the free abdominal flap, we retrospectively compared those that had undergone the intraflap perfusion procedure (n = 108) and those who did not (n = 112). A 10 mL injection of heparinized physiological saline solution (100 units/mL) was administered into the deep inferior epigastric artery. Intraflap perfusion was performed before, during, and after vein anastomosis, without the vessel clip of the vein. Artery anastomosis was performed without the use of a vein clamp. Further, vein anastomosis was performed tightly to prevent leakage from the vein anastomosis site during artery anastomosis.

RESULTS

The rates of superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) superdrainage (18.5% vs. 42.0%, P < 0.001), and intraoperative flap congestion (0.9% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.01) were significantly lower in patients undergoing this procedure. There were no significant differences regarding other factors (age, BMI, laterality, comorbidities, and other operative details).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraflap perfusion prevented long-term stasis at the venous anastomosis site and capillary level. It could reduce flap congestion. SIEV superdrainage was performed to manage flap congestion, particularly in patients who did not undergo this procedure. Consequently, it can be inferred that this procedure reduces the rate of superdrainage.

Application of fibrin glue for hematoma prophylaxis in selective aponeurectomy in Dupuytren's disease

INTRODUCTION

Fibrin glue (FG) can be applied in several surgical procedures at wound closure to reduce postoperative complications such as hematoma formation and wound impairment. The purpose of this study is to assess these preventive surgical benefits in Dupuytren's disease of the hand.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent selective aponeurectomy for Dupuytren's disease between 2010 and 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: either receiving or not receiving FG. The primary outcome variables were postoperative bleeding, wound healing impairment, and further pooled postoperative complications.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three patients were included in the analysis of which 108 patients were treated with FG, while 24 did not. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes regarding postoperative bleeding, infections, or revision surgery. However, in the group receiving FG, there was a tendency toward higher wound healing impairment (13%, p = 0.07). The FG group showed a significantly higher pooled complication rate (18.5%, p < 0.02). Complication in general increased with higher Tubiana classification and number of resected cords. Smoking tripled the risk of impaired wound, while cardiovascular comorbidities increased postoperative bleeding by the factor of 11.

CONCLUSION

FG did not show a preventive outcome regarding bleeding. The FG group had a tendency for a higher wound healing incidence. Smoking and arterial hypertension correlated with a higher postoperative complication rate. The overall incidence of complications was higher in the FG group. The quality of the surgical intervention as well as accurate hemostasis cannot be corrected by the application of FG.

Utilization of a partial rib-sparing procedure in microvascular breast reconstruction for preserving intercostal nerve and nipple reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In microvascular breast reconstruction, internal mammary vessel (IMV) exposure has been performed. The preservation of intercostal nerve (ICN) is effective for preserving sensibility and decreasing postoperative pain. In nipple reconstruction, cartilage grafting is performed to provide additional support and projection. We considered that ICN preservation and costal cartilage banking could be performed simultaneously. This method was described as the "partial rib-sparing procedure." The purpose of this study was to introduce this procedure.

METHODS

Surgical technique of this procedure was as follows. The second intercostal space was used. The width of the trimmed cartilage was kept within the superior half of the third costal cartilage. Soft tissue within 5 mm of the inferior border of the second rib edge was preserved to save the second ICN. The length of IMVs in the partial rib-sparing procedure and that in the total rib-sparing procedure was compared.

RESULTS

The number of patients in the partial rib-sparing and total rib-sparing groups was 137 procedures and 57 procedures, respectively. The length of IMVs was significantly longer in the partial rib-sparing procedure (median 20.5 mm vs. 17.6 mm, P < 0.001). In the partial rib-sparing group, no patient complained of prolonged local pain, and chest wall contour abnormalities were absent in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The partial rib-sparing procedure is superior, especially for patients with narrow intercostal spaces and/or patients who decide to undergo nipple reconstruction with costal cartilage. This procedure could be performed to preserve the soft tissues around the ICN and decrease the postoperative pain.

EFFECT OF AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT SITE ON DENTAL IMPLANT SURVIVAL AND DONOR SITE COMPLICATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to answer the following focus questions: Is the implant survival in augmented bone utilizing iliac crest bone grafts the same as while using intraoral autologous bone grafts? Is the incidence of postoperative donor site complications the same when using iliac crest bone grafts as opposed to intraoral grafts?

METHODS

Systematic searches of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL) were performed to identify studies which reported on implant survival and postoperative complications for dental implants placed in grafted partially/completely edentulous human jaws. Studies were included if: they reported on 2-piece micro-rough surface root form dental implants placed in bone-augmented completely or partially edentulous human jaws, and the jaws must have been augmented with autologous bone graft materials. Time and nature of postoperative complications must have been reported. Two investigators performed data extraction and a Cohen's unweighted kappa was calculated for inter-investigator reliability. A meta-analysis was performed for the extracted data on implant survival rate in both iliac crest grafts and intra-oral grafts. A qualitative analysis was performed on the information extracted on graft donor site complications. Quality assessment of the included studies were done using the Cochrane collaboration tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included in the final analysis. The calculated kappa ranged between 0.77-0.89 for the literature search and identification process. Fourteen studies were included with data on implant survival including five randomized controlled clinical trials. The meta-analysis of included studies revealed that the implant survival rate of dental implants placed in jaws augmented with iliac crest grafts was lower than those placed in jaws augmented with intra-oral bone grafts at 6-months [ICG = 95.8% IOG = 98.4%; P < .001], 12-months [ICG = 97.0%, IOG = 98.4%; P < .001], 24-months [ICG = 85.9%, IOG = 98.2%; P < .001], 60-months [ICG = 90.0%, IOG = 91.5%; P < .001], and at 120-months [ICG = 88.8%, IOG = 95.2%; P < .001] follow-up periods. Iliac crest grafts were also frequently associated with donor site complications including pain / discomfort, gait disturbance, and sensory disturbance.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that implant survival is consistently higher in bone harvested from intraoral sites compared to iliac crest grafts. Donor site complications seemed to be a frequent finding with iliac crest grafts and mental grafts.

FUNDING

None.

REGISTRATION

The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021283738).