Comparison of Conventional and Platelet-Rich Plasma-Assisted Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Methods of Assisted Fat Grafting: A Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have proposed the utilization of stromal vascular fraction (SVF), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), and platelet products as auxiliary grafting techniques to improve the survival rate of fat grafts. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various fat grafting methods since 2010 through a network meta-analysis, aiming to identify the most effective technique for fat grafting.

METHODS

Clinic trials on assisted fat grafting were searched from Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the period from January 1, 2010 to March 2024. The risk of bias in the included trials was meticulously assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The survival rate of fat grafts served as the primary evaluation metric for effectiveness, while complications were employed as the indicator for safety.

RESULTS

The study incorporated 31 clinic trials, involving a total of 1656 patients. The findings indicated that the survival rate with assisted fat grafting significantly surpassed that of simple fat grafting (SUCRA, 10.43%). Notably, ADSC-assisted fat grafting exhibited the highest survival rate (SUCRA, 82.17%), followed by Salvia miltiorrhiza (SM)-assisted fat grafting (SUCRA, 69.76%). In terms of safety, the most prevalent complications associated with fat grafting were fat sclerosis and fat necrosis. Adc-assisted fat grafting was correlated with the lowest incidence of complications (SUCRA, 41.00%), followed by simple fat grafting (SUCRA, 40.99%). However, PRP-assisted (SUCRA, 52.86%) and SVF-assisted fat grafting (SUCRA, 65.14%) showed higher complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Various methods of assisted fat grafting can significantly enhance the survival rate, but they often fail to effectively mitigate the incidence of complications. Compared to other methods, adipose mesenchymal stem cells-assisted fat grafting consistently yielded a higher survival rate of grafts and fewer complications. Consequently, this approach represents a relatively effective method for assisting in fat grafting at present.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Contemporary Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices and Adjunct Therapies in Autologous Fat Grafting Procedures: A Survey of The Aesthetic Society Members

Background

Autologous fat grafting (AFG) is a widely used surgical technique that involves extracting a patient's own adipose tissue and transferring it to different areas of the body. This practice is still evolving. Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis and use of adjuncts in plastic surgery are currently limited, with a notable absence of standardized guidelines for AFG.

Objectives

In this survey, we assess contemporary antibiotic practices and adjuncts in AFG procedures.

Methods

A 52-question survey was emailed to 3106 active members of The Aesthetic Society. Two hundred and ninety-three responses were recorded, representing a 9% response rate.

Results

We analyzed 288 responses. The most common AFG procedures were facial (38%), gluteal (34%), and breast (27%) augmentation. Preoperative antibiotics were used by 84.0% overall, with rates of 74.3%, 88.0%, and 92.7% in face, breast, and gluteal AFG, respectively. Lipoaspirate-antibiotic mixing was reported by 19.8%, mainly during gluteal AFG (46.9%), and less so in face (2.8%) and breast (8%) AFG. Notably, 46.9% of surgeons administered prolonged prophylaxis for 72 h or more. Tranexamic acid was utilized by 39.9% of the surveyed surgeons. Platelet-rich plasma was used by 5.6%. Doppler ultrasound was incorporated by 16.7% in AFG, with 21.5% in gluteal AFG, 14% in the face, and 19% in breast procedures.

Conclusions

In this survey, we offer insights into antibiotic practices and adjunct therapies in AFG, especially intraoperative antibiotic mixing. Practices among members of The Aesthetic Society vary from guidelines. It is crucial to standardize practices and conduct further research to pave the way for evidence-based guidelines in AFG.

Level of Evidence 5

Injectable Pectin-Alginate Hydrogels for Improving Vascularization and Adipogenesis of Human Fat Graft

Autologous fat grafting (AFG) is the most prevailing tool for soft tissue regeneration in clinics, although efficiency is limited to unpredictable volume resorption due to poor vascularization and eventual necrosis. This study sought to improve the AFG efficiency using a hydrogel as a carrier for human fat graft (F) with and without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PRP is clinically well known for the local release of several endogenous growth factors and has been in clinical use already. A human-fat-graft-encapsulated pectin-alginate hydrogel (FG) was developed and characterized. PRP was added to F to develop a human fat graft with PRP (FP). FP was admixed with a pectin-alginate hydrogel to develop FGP. FG and FGP showed the smooth injectable, elastic, and shear-thinning properties. FG and FGP groups showed enhanced cell viability and proliferation compared to the control F in vitro. We also investigated the in vivo angiogenesis and neo-adipogenesis ability of F, FG, FGP, and FP in nude mice after subcutaneous injection. After 2 and 4 weeks, an MRI of the mice was conducted, followed by graft explantation. The explanted grafts were also assessed histologically and with immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies. MRI and histology results revealed better vascularity of the FG and FGP system compared to fat graft alone. Further, the IHC studies, CD 31, and perilipin staining also revealed better vasculature and adipogenesis of FG and FGP systems. These results indicate the enhanced angiogenesis and adipogenesis of FG and FGP. Thus, developed pectin-alginate hydrogel-based fat graft systems FG and FGP replenish the native microenvironment by mediating angiogenesis and adipogenesis, thereby maximizing the clinical outcomes of autologous fat grafting.

Assessing the effect of PRP addition to facial micro-lipofilling for patients suffering from Scleroderma: A prospective routine care analysis

BACKGROUND

Combining fat graft with platelet derived products is now common practice in regenerative surgery. We proposed to assess the safety and efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) addition to a micro-lipofilling protocol for facial treatment of patients suffering from Systemic Sclerosis (SSc).

OBJECTIVE

Main objective was to evaluate the improvement of the Mouth Handicap In Systemic Sclerosis (MHISS) scale score at 6 months post-therapy.

METHOD

Included SSc patients had a MHISS score equal or up to 20. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia. Micro-fat and PRP (CCA-NA from DEPA Classification) were mixed in a 70/30 ratio, before injection in peri-oral sites according to a specific protocol. Efficacy criteria were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Moreover, we compared this cohort (current study) to a former (2015) non-enriched micro-lipofilling cohort in the same indication, using the same protocol.

RESULTS

Thirteen women patients with mean age of 53.2 years (±14.3) have been included. At baseline, mean MHISS score was 29.5 (±8.7) and significantly decreased to 22.5 (±7.8) at 6 months (P=0.016), corresponding to a 22.0% of improvement from baseline, with a mean decrease of 6.5 points (±7.5) at 6 months. Patients received a mean volume of 30.8ml PRP-micro-fat (±8.1ml).

CONCLUSION

PRP addition appeared beneficial, however, controlled studies are required to determine its superiority to facial micro-lipofilling.

Wound-Microenvironment Engineering through Advanced-Dressing Bioprinting

In patients with comorbidities, a large number of wounds become chronic, representing an overwhelming economic burden for healthcare systems. Engineering the microenvironment is a paramount trend to activate cells and burst-healing mechanisms. The extrusion bioprinting of advanced dressings was performed with novel composite bioinks made by blending adipose decellularized extracellular matrix with plasma and human dermal fibroblasts. Rheological and microstructural assessments of the composite hydrogels supported post-printing cell viability and proliferation over time. Embedded fibroblasts expressed steady concentrations of extracellular matrix proteins, including type 1, 3 and 4 collagens and fibronectin. ELISA assessments, multiplex protein arrays and ensuing bioinformatic analyses revealed paracrine activities corresponding to wound-healing activation through the modulation of inflammation and angiogenesis. The two modalities of advanced dressings, differing in platelet number, showed differences in the release of inflammatory and angiogenic cytokines, including interleukin 8 (IL-8), monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). The conditioned media stimulated human-dermal-cell proliferation over time. Our findings open the door to engineering the microenvironment as a strategy to enhance healing.