An Objective Analysis of Quality and Readability of Online Information for Patients seeking Cosmetic Surgery Abroad

Readability of Online Spanish Materials for Breast Reconstruction Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps

Background The internet has become an increasingly popular tool for patients to find information pertaining to medical procedures. Although the information is easily accessible, data shows that many online educational materials pertaining to surgical subspecialties are far above the average reading level in the United States. The aim of this study was to evaluate the English and Spanish online materials for the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction procedure. Methods The first eight institutional or organizational websites that provided information on the DIEP procedure in English and Spanish were included. Each website was evaluated using the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (CSAT), and either Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) for English websites or Spanish Orthographic Length (SOL) for Spanish websites. Results The English websites had a statistically lower CSAT score compared to the Spanish websites (p=0.006). However, Spanish websites had a statistically higher percentage of complex words compared to English sources (p<0.001). An analysis of reading grade levels through SMOG and SOL scores revealed that Spanish websites had statistically lower scores (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the understandability or actionability scores between the English and Spanish websites. Conclusions Online educational materials on the DIEP flap reconstruction procedure should be readable, understandable, actionable, and culturally sensitive. Our analysis revealed that improvements can be made in understandability and actionability on these websites. Plastic surgeons should be aware of what constitutes a great online educational resource and what online educational materials their patients will have access to.

Plastic Surgery Tourism: Complications, Costs, and Unnecessary Spending?

Background

The liability of plastic surgery tourism in patient health and postoperative resource allocation is significant. Procedures completed within the context of medical tourism often lack rigorous quality assurance and provide limited preoperative evaluation or postoperative care. Not only does this jeopardize the patient's well-being, but it also increases the financial burden and redirects invaluable resources domestically through often unnecessary diagnostic tests and hospitalizations.

Objectives

This manuscript will examine the complications and associated costs following plastic surgery tourism and highlight unnecessary expenses for patients with outpatient complications.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients 18 years or older who underwent destination surgery and were seen within 1 year postoperatively in consultation with plastic surgery at our health system between January 11, 2015 and January 7, 2022. Patient admissions were reviewed and deemed necessary or unnecessary after review by 2 physicians.

Results

The inclusion criteria were met by 41 patients, of whom hospitalization was deemed necessary in 28 patients vs unnecessary in 13 patients. The most common procedures included abdominoplasty, liposuction, breast augmentation, and "Brazilian butt lift." The most common complications were seroma and infection. Patients deemed to have a necessary admission often required at least 1 operation, were more likely to need intravenous antibiotics, were less likely to have the diagnosis of "pain," necessitated a longer hospitalization, and incurred a higher cost. The total financial burden was $523,272 for all 41 patients.

Conclusions

Plastic surgery tourism poses substantial health risks, the morbidities are expensive, and it strains hospital resources.

Level of Evidence 5