Long-term safety review of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia - What to look for when treatment-free remission is not an option

Practical considerations in the management of patients treated with bosutinib for chronic myeloid leukemia

Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and for patients with Ph + chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. As is the case for all TKIs approved for treatment of CML, bosutinib is associated with adverse events (AEs) that require appropriate management to ensure adherence to treatment and optimized outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide physicians with updated practical information for the prevention and management of AEs occurring during treatment with bosutinib, including dosing strategies, based on the latest published evidence and clinical experience. Clinical studies and real-world evidence have shown bosutinib has a generally favorable safety profile, which has remained consistent across lines of therapy and in long-term reports. Adjusting the starting dose and/or modifying the dose during treatment with bosutinib are important strategies to manage AEs and improve tolerability, which are recognized within the label and in treatment guidelines. Dosing adjustment strategies to manage AEs are a recognized management approach for other TKIs in the treatment of CML and are not exclusive to bosutinib. In summary, long-term results from clinical trials and emerging real-world evidence demonstrate bosutinib has a safety profile that can largely be managed with treatment modifications and/or supportive care. Increased experience in managing toxicities and by using a personalized dosing approach may further improve adherence and outcomes with bosutinib.

Overcoming clinical BCR-ABL1 compound mutant resistance with combined ponatinib and asciminib therapy

BCR-ABL1 compound mutations can lead to resistance to ABL1 inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), which could be targeted by combining the ATP-site inhibitor ponatinib and the allosteric inhibitor asciminib. Here, we report the clinical validation of this approach in a CML patient, providing a basis for combination therapy to overcome such resistance.

Combination of an aurora kinase inhibitor and the ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor asciminib against ABL inhibitor-resistant CML cells

The development of BCR::ABL1-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, resistance to ABL TKIs can develop in CML patients due to BCR::ABL1 point mutations and CML leukemia stem cell (LSC). Aurora kinases are essential kinases for cell division and regulate mitosis, especially the process of chromosomal segregation. Aurora kinase members also promote cancer cell survival and proliferation. This study analyzed whether aurora kinases were regulated in the progression of CML. It also evaluated the efficacy of the ABL TKI asciminib and the aurora kinase inhibitor LY3295668. The expressions of AURKA and AURKB were higher in the CML cells compared with normal cells using a public database (GSE100026). Asciminib or LY3295668 alone inhibited CML cells after 72 h, and cellular cytotoxicity was increased. The combined use of Asciminib and LY3295668 increased superior efficacy compared with either drug alone. Colony formation was reduced by cotreatment with asciminib and LY3295668. In the cell-cycle analyses, LY3295668 induced G2/M arrest. Cell populations in the sub-G1 phase were observed when cotreating with asciminib and LY3295668. The combination treatment also changed the mitochondrial membrane potential. In addition, AURKA shRNA transfectant cells had increased asciminib sensitivity. Combining asciminib and aurora kinase inhibition enhanced the efficacy and is proposed as a new therapeutic option for patients with CML. These findings have clinical implications for a potential novel therapeutic strategy for CML patients.

A Review of the Therapeutic Role of Bosutinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

The development of the BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has transformed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from a fatal disease to an often-indolent illness that, when managed effectively, can restore a life expectancy close to that of the normal population. Bosutinib is a second-generation TKI approved for adults with Ph-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase that is resistant or intolerant to prior therapy, and for newly diagnosed Ph-positive chronic phase CML. This review details the efficacy of bosutinib for the treatment of CML in the first- and second-line settings, as well as in third- and later-line settings for high-risk patients resistant or intolerant to at least 2 TKIs. It also outlines bosutinib studies that provide evidence for dose-optimization strategies that can be used to improve efficacy and effectively manage adverse events. The studies that provide evidence for specific patient populations benefiting particularly from bosutinib dose-optimization strategies are also discussed. The well-established, long-term side-effect profile and the potential to make dose adjustments with bosutinib make it an appropriate treatment option for patients with CML. Bosutinib has demonstrated a positive impact on health-related quality of life and an important role in the long-term treatment of patients with CML.

Chronic myeloid leukaemia: Biology and therapy

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is caused by BCR::ABL1. Tyrosine kinase-inhibitors (TKIs) are the initial therapy. Several organizations have reported milestones to evaluate response to initial TKI-therapy and suggest when a change of TKI should be considered. Achieving treatment-free remission (TFR) is increasingly recognized as the optimal therapy goal. Which TKI is the best initial therapy for which persons and what depth and duration of molecular remission is needed to achieve TFR are controversial. In this review we discuss these issues and suggest future research directions.

CX‑5461 potentiates imatinib‑induced apoptosis in K562 cells by stimulating KIF1B expression

The selective RNA polymerase I inhibitor CX-5461 has been shown to be effective in treating some types of leukemic disorders. Emerging evidence suggests that combined treatments with CX-5461 and other chemotherapeutic agents may achieve enhanced effectiveness as compared with monotherapies. Currently, pharmacodynamic properties of the combination of CX-5461 with tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain to be explored. The present study tested whether CX-5461 could potentiate the effect of imatinib in the human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562, which is p53-deficient. It was demonstrated that CX-5461 at 100 nM, which was non-cytotoxic in K562 cells, potentiated the pro-apoptotic effect of imatinib. Mechanistically, the present study identified that the upregulated expression of kinesin family member 1B (KIF1B) gene might be involved in mediating the pro-apoptotic effect of imatinib/CX-5461 combination. Under the present experimental settings, however, neither CX-5461 nor imatinib alone exhibited a significant effect on KIF1B expression. Moreover, using other leukemic cell lines, it was demonstrated that regulation of KIF1B expression by imatinib/CX-5461 was not a ubiquitous phenomenon in leukemic cells and should be studied in a cell type-specific manner. In conclusion, the results suggested that the synergistic interaction between CX-5461 and imatinib may be of potential clinical value for the treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia.

Twenty years of evolution of CML therapy: how the treatment goal is moving from disease to patient

The introduction of imatinib in 2000 opened the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CML therapy and has revolutionized the life expectancy of CML patients, which is now quite like the one of the healthy aged population. Over the last 20 years, both the TKI therapy itself and the objectives have undergone evolutions highlighted and discussed in this review. The main objective of the CML therapy in the first 10 years after TKI introduction was to abolish the disease progression from the chronic to the blastic phase and guarantee the long-term survival of the great majority of patients. In the second 10 years (from 2010 to the present), the main objective of CML therapy moved from survival, considered achieved as a goal, to treatment-free remission (TFR). Two phenomena emerged: no more than 50-60% of CML patients could be candidates for discontinuation and over 50% of them molecularly relapse. The increased cumulative incidence of specific TKI off-target side effects was such relevant to compel to discontinue or reduce the TKI administration in a significant proportion of patients and to avoid a specific TKI in particular settings of patients. Therefore, the treatment strategy must be adapted to each category of patients. What about the patients who do not get or fail the TFR? Should they be compelled to continue the TKIs at the maximum tolerated dose? Alternative strategies based on the principle of minimal effective dose have been tested with success and they are now re-evaluated with more attention, since they guarantee survival and probably a better quality of life, too. Moving from treating the disease to treating the patient is an important change of paradigm. We can say that we are entering a personalized CML therapy, which considers the patients' age, their comorbidities, tolerability, and specific objectives. In this scenario, the new techniques supporting the monitoring of the patients, such as the digital PCR, must be considered. In the present review, we present in deep this evolution and comment on the future perspectives of CML therapy.

Comparison of cutaneous adverse events between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often experience cutaneous adverse events, such as rashes and pruritus. In this study, we aimed to compare the risks of cutaneous adverse events between imatinib- and second-generation TKI-treated patients with CML.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Paired reviewers independently obtained studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library published until 15 March 2022. The following terms were searched: (Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic and BCR-ABL Positive), chronic myeloid leukemia, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI, imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and radotinib. Two independent reviewers screened the results and selected articles on cutaneous adverse events. RevMan 5.4 and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to perform the meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Eleven trials involving 4502 patients were analyzed in this study. Patients treated with second-generation TKIs were significantly more likely to experience cutaneous adverse events than those treated with imatinib with a relative risk (RR) of 1.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], [1.25-2.09]). Except dasatinib (RR [95% CI], 1.39 [0.75-2.56]), the risk of adverse events was more with second-generation TKIs than with imatinib as follows: nilotinib (2.11 [1.53-2.90]), bosutinib (1.41 [1.07-1.86]), and radotinib (1.87 [1.33-2.63]). Rash was the most common cutaneous adverse event that was observed in 21.6% of cases across all grades, followed by pruritus (5.7%) and alopecia (4.3%). In conclusion, our findings suggest that cutaneous adverse events occur more frequently with second-generation TKIs than with imatinib. Therefore, effective management of the cutaneous outcome is necessary to achieve high patient adherence to medication and successful treatment with TKIs.

Asciminib in the Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Focus on Patient Selection and Outcomes

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly changed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and improved outcomes for patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP) and accelerated phase (AP). Now armed with numerous effective therapeutic options, clinicians must consider various patient- and disease-specific factors when selecting the most appropriate TKI across lines of therapy. While most patients with CML expected to have a near-normal life expectancy due to the success of TKIs, emphasis has expanded beyond response and survival to include factors like quality of life, tolerability, and long-term toxicity management. Importantly, a subset of patients can achieve sustained deep molecular response and can attain treatment-free remission. Despite these successes, unmet needs remain related to CML treatment, including the persistent challenge of treatment resistance and intolerance, broadening treatment options for patients with resistance mutations or serious comorbidities, and focus on specific populations such as children and young adults. In particular, the only previously available treatments for patients with CML-CP with the T315I mutation were ponatinib, olverembatinib (exclusively approved for use in China at the time of this writing), omacetaxine, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Asciminib has entered the CML treatment landscape as a new option for adult patients with CML-CP who have received ≥2 prior TKIs or those with the T315I mutation. Asciminib's unique mechanism of action, Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket, sets it apart from traditional adenosine triphosphate-competitive TKIs. While asciminib may overcome unmet needs for patients with CML-CP and continues to be studied in other novel settings, guidance on how to integrate asciminib in treatment algorithms is needed. This review focuses on clinical data and how asciminib can overcome current unmet needs, discusses how to individualize patient selection, and highlights future directions to investigate asciminib in earlier lines of therapy and in children and adolescents.

[Current management and new treatment strategies of chronic myeloid leukemia]

The introduction of orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) into the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) 25 years ago has substantially improved the clinical outcome of affected patients and resulted in a near-normal life expectancy in chronic phase (CP). Despite of a significant fraction of currently about one third of newly diagnosed CP patients eventually reaching treatment-free remission, the majority of patients still remain on life-long treatment with TKIs. Therefore, a profound knowledge of TKI-related side effects including an increased sensitivity for organ systems predominantly involved, grading, kinetics, duration and reversibility, class-effects versus compound-relatedness as well as a better understanding of how particularly long-lasting, chronic, sometimes formally low-grade toxicities can actually significantly impair patient's self-assessed quality of life is of utmost importance for an adequate patient/doctor relationship. Given that nowadays, severity and degree of preexisting comorbidities might predict long-term survival of individual patients more significantly than the underlying CML itself, it becomes most important to properly and thoroughly select the TKI of choice on this basis as well as on the individually required co-medications. Given the variety of 2nd, 3rd and now allosteric TKIs available for the molecular targeting of the disease-driving BCR-ABL oncogene in addition to the "class-defining" Imatinib, personalization of CML therapy should now be further extended towards a better appreciation of comorbidities and co-medications before selection of an individual's TKI treatment complemented by a long-term oriented, patient-centered management and prevention of (sometimes irreversible) TKI side effects.

A Pragmatic Approach to Managing Long-Term Adverse Effects in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Long-term outcomes have significantly improved with treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. With proper treatment, most patients will achieve similar survival rates compared to an age-matched population. Treatment-free remission is not attainable for over half of patients and chronic treatment carries with it unique challenges. We provide a pragmatic approach to the monitoring and management of chronic adverse effects (AEs).

RECENT FINDINGS

In the presence of severe or intolerable AEs, switching tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is reasonable but is not without risk. Dose reductions can be attempted when response is stable to reduce AE intensity. More frequent molecular monitoring with any change is essential. Treatment strategies must adapt to the personalized treatment goal of each patient. Long-term survival remains good even when response is less than a complete molecular response. Consider risks of new AEs when changing therapy and evaluate for dose reductions when appropriate.

Cardiovascular risk in chronic myeloid leukaemia: A multidisciplinary consensus on screening and management

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the mainstay of treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), but cardiovascular (CV) risk and exacerbation of underlying risk factors associated with TKIs have become widely debated. Real-world evidence reveals little application of CV risk factor screening or continued monitoring within UK CML management. This consensus paper presents practical recommendations to assist healthcare professionals in conducting CV screening/comorbidity management for patients receiving TKIs.

METHODS

We conducted a multidisciplinary panel meeting and two iterative surveys involving 10 CML specialists: five haematologists, two cardio-oncologists, one vascular surgeon, one haemato-oncology pharmacist and one specialist nurse practitioner.

RESULTS

The panel recommended that patients commencing second-/third-generation TKIs undergo formal CV risk assessment at baseline, with additional investigations and involvement of cardiologists/vascular surgeons for those with high CV risk. During treatment, patients should undergo CV monitoring, with the nature and frequency of testing dependent on TKI and baseline CV risk. For patients who develop CV adverse events, decision-making around TKI interruption, cessation or change should be multidisciplinary and balance CV and haematological risk.

CONCLUSION

The panel anticipates these recommendations will support healthcare professionals in implementing CV risk screening and monitoring, broadly and consistently, and thereby help optimise TKI treatment for CML.

Toxicity of Asciminib in Real Clinical Practice: Analysis of Side Effects and Cross-Toxicity with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

(1) Background: Despite the prognostic improvements achieved with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a minority of patients still fail TKIs. The recent introduction of asciminib may be a promising option in intolerant patients, as it is a first-in-class inhibitor with a more selective mechanism of action different from the ATP-competitive inhibition that occurs with TKIs. Therefore, our goal was to analyze toxicities shown with asciminib as well as to study cross-toxicity with previous TKIs. (2) Methods: An observational, multicenter, retrospective study was performed with data from 77 patients with CML with therapeutic failure to second-generation TKIs who received asciminib through a managed-access program (MAP) (3) Results: With a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 22 patients (28.5%) discontinued treatment: 32% (7/22) due to intolerance and 45% (10/22) due to resistance. Fifty-five percent of the patients reported adverse effects (AEs) with asciminib and eighteen percent grade 3-4. Most frequent AEs were: fatigue (18%), thrombocytopenia (17%), anemia (12%), and arthralgias (12%). None of the patients experienced cardiovascular events or occlusive arterial disease. Further, 26%, 25%, and 9% of patients required dose adjustment, temporary suspension, or definitive discontinuation of treatment, respectively. Toxicities under asciminib seemed lower than with prior TKIs for anemia, cardiovascular events, pleural/pericardial effusion, diarrhea, and edema. Cross-toxicity risk was statistically significant for thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, vomiting, and pancreatitis. (4) Conclusion: Asciminib is a molecule with a good safety profile and with a low rate of AEs. However, despite its new mechanism of action, asciminib presents a risk of cross-toxicity with classical TKIs for some AEs.