Novel nonsecosteroidal vitamin D3 carboxylic acid analogs for osteoporosis, and SAR analysis

The Centennial Collection of VDR Ligands: Metabolites, Analogs, Hybrids and Non-Secosteroidal Ligands

Since the discovery of vitamin D a century ago, a great number of metabolites, analogs, hybrids and nonsteroidal VDR ligands have been developed. An enormous effort has been made to synthesize compounds which present beneficial properties while attaining lower calcium serum levels than calcitriol. This structural review covers VDR ligands published to date.

Vitamin D and Its Synthetic Analogs

For many individuals, in particular during winter, supplementation with the secosteroid vitamin D₃ is essential for the prevention of bone disorders, muscle weakness, autoimmune diseases, and possibly also different types of cancer. Vitamin D₃ acts via its metabolite 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ [1,25(OH)₂D₃] as potent agonist of the transcription factor vitamin D receptor (VDR). Thus, vitamin D directly affects chromatin structure and gene regulation at thousands of genomic loci, i.e., the epigenome and transcriptome of its target tissues. Modifications of 1,25(OH)₂D₃ at its side-chain, A-ring, triene system, or C-ring, alone and in combination, as well as nonsteroidal mimics provided numerous potent VDR agonists and some antagonists. The nearly 150 crystal structures of VDR’s ligand-binding domain with various vitamin D compounds allow a detailed molecular understanding of their action. This review discusses the most important vitamin D analogs presented during the past 10 years and molecular insight derived from new structural information on the VDR protein.

Pharmacological use of a novel scaffold, anomeric N,N-diarylamino tetrahydropyran: molecular similarity search, chemocentric target profiling, and experimental evidence

Rational drug design against a determined target (disease, pathway, or protein) is the main strategy in drug discovery. However, regardless of the main strategy, chemists really wonder how to maximize the utility of their new compounds by drug repositioning them as clinical drug candidates in drug discovery. In this study, we started our drug discovery "from curiosity in the chemical structure of a drug scaffold itself" rather than "for a specific target". As a new drug scaffold, anomeric diarylamino cyclic aminal scaffold 1, was designed by combining two known drug scaffolds (diphenylamine and the most popular cyclic ether, tetrahydropyran/tetrahydrofuran) and synthesized through conventional Brønsted acid catalysis and metal-free α-C(sp3)-H functionalized oxidative cyclization. To identify the utility of the new scaffold 1, it was investigated through 2D and 3D similarity screening and chemocentric target prediction. The predicted proteins were investigated by an experimental assay. The scaffold 1 was reported to have an antineuroinflammatory agent to reduce NO production, and compound 10 concentration-dependently regulated the expression level of IL-6, PGE-2, TNF-α, ER-β, VDR, CTSD, and iNOS, thus exhibiting neuroprotective activity.

Predicted structures of new Vitamin D Receptor agonists based on available X-ray structures

Current efforts in the field of vitamin D are to develop 1,25(OH)2D3 analogs that exhibit equal or even increased anti-proliferative activity while possessing a reduced tendency to cause hypercalcemia. The study proposes a new, rational design of vitamin D analogs based on data available in the Protein Data Bank. Undertaken approach was to minimize the electrostatic interaction energies available after the reconstruction of charge density with the aid of the pseudoatom databank, namely the University at Buffalo Pseudoatom Databank (UBDB). Analysis of 24 vitamin D analogs, bearing similar molecular structures complexed with Vitamin D Receptor enabled the design of new agonists forming all advantageous interaction to the receptor, coded TB1, TB2, TB3 and TB4.

Structural considerations of vitamin D signaling

Crystal structures represent the static picture in the life of a molecule giving a sneak preview what it might be in reality. Hence, it is very hard to extrapolate from these photos toward dynamic processes such as transcriptional regulation. Mechanistically VDR may be considered as molecular machine able to perform ligand-, DNA- and protein recognition, and interaction in a multi-task manner. Taking this into account the functional net effect will be the combination of all these processes. The long awaited answer to explain the differences in physiological effects for various ligands was one of the biggest disappointment that crystal structures provided since no substantial distinction could be made for the conformation of the active VDR-ligand complexes. This may have come from the limitation on the complexity of the available ligand-VDR structures. The recent studies with full length VDR-RXRα showed somewhat more comprehensive perspective for the 3D organization and possible function of the VDR-RXRα-cofactor complex. In addition to in vitro approaches, also computational tools had been introduced with the aim to get understanding on the mechanic and dynamic properties of the VDR complexes with some success. Using these methods and based on measurable descriptors such as pocket size and positions of side chains it is possible to note subtle differences between the structures. The meaning of these differences has not been fully understood yet but the possibility of a “butterfly effect” may have more extreme consequences in terms of VDR signaling. In this review, the three functional aspects (ligand-, DNA- and protein recognition, and binding) will be discussed with respect to available data as well as possible implication and questions that may be important to address in the future.

Structure-activity relationship of nonsecosteroidal vitamin D receptor modulators

The vitamin D receptor (VDR), a receptor for the secosteroid 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], is a promising drug target in the treatment of bone and mineral disorders, cancer, autoimmune disease, infection, and cardiovascular disease. Indeed, approximately 100 nonsecosteroidal VDR modulators (VDRMs) have been developed. Analysis of X-ray crystal structures reveals: (i) nonsecosteroidal VDRMs bind to VDR in a position similar to 1,25(OH)2D3; (ii) hydrogen bond interactions between ligands and VDR are the most important for VDR binding; (iii) hydrophobic interactions and CH-π interactions in aromatic ligands are also important for VDR binding; and (iv) exchange of C-O-C linkage to C-CH2-C linkage in VDRMs increases transactivation activity, probably as a result of an entropic effect of solvation/desolvation of molecules. Several VDRMs have better therapeutic efficacy when compared to 1,25(OH)2D3 in experimental models of cancer and osteoporosis with less induction of hypercalcemia, a major potential adverse effect in the clinical application of VDR ligands.