1
|
Rauff R, Abedeera SM, Schmocker S, Xie J, Abeysirigunawardena SC. Peptides Targeting RNA m 6 A Methylations Influence the Viability of Cancer Cells. ChemMedChem 2023; 18:e202200549. [PMID: 36567478 PMCID: PMC9957953 DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202200549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6 A) is the most abundant nucleotide modification observed in eukaryotic mRNA. Changes in m6 A levels in transcriptome are tightly correlated to expression levels of m6 A methyltransferases and demethylases. Abnormal expression levels of methyltransferases and demethylases are observed in various diseases and health conditions such as cancer, male infertility, and obesity. This research explores the efficacy of m6 A-modified RNA as an anticancer drug target. We discovered a 12-mer peptide that binds specifically to m6 A-modified RNA using phage display experiments. Our fluorescence-based assays illustrate the selected peptide binds to methylated RNA with lower micromolar affinity and inhibit the binding of protein FTO, a demethylase enzyme specific to m6 A modification. When cancer cell lines were treated with mtp1, it led to an increase in m6 A levels and a decrease in cell viability. Hence our results illustrate the potential of mtp1 to be developed as a drug for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rushdhi Rauff
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kent State University, 1175 Risman Drive, Kent, OH 44242, USA
| | - Sudeshi M Abedeera
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kent State University, 1175 Risman Drive, Kent, OH 44242, USA
| | - Stefani Schmocker
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kent State University, 1175 Risman Drive, Kent, OH 44242, USA
| | - Jiale Xie
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kent State University, 1175 Risman Drive, Kent, OH 44242, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Largy E, König A, Ghosh A, Ghosh D, Benabou S, Rosu F, Gabelica V. Mass Spectrometry of Nucleic Acid Noncovalent Complexes. Chem Rev 2021; 122:7720-7839. [PMID: 34587741 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nucleic acids have been among the first targets for antitumor drugs and antibiotics. With the unveiling of new biological roles in regulation of gene expression, specific DNA and RNA structures have become very attractive targets, especially when the corresponding proteins are undruggable. Biophysical assays to assess target structure as well as ligand binding stoichiometry, affinity, specificity, and binding modes are part of the drug development process. Mass spectrometry offers unique advantages as a biophysical method owing to its ability to distinguish each stoichiometry present in a mixture. In addition, advanced mass spectrometry approaches (reactive probing, fragmentation techniques, ion mobility spectrometry, ion spectroscopy) provide more detailed information on the complexes. Here, we review the fundamentals of mass spectrometry and all its particularities when studying noncovalent nucleic acid structures, and then review what has been learned thanks to mass spectrometry on nucleic acid structures, self-assemblies (e.g., duplexes or G-quadruplexes), and their complexes with ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Largy
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, IECB, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Alexander König
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, IECB, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Anirban Ghosh
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, IECB, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Debasmita Ghosh
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, IECB, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Sanae Benabou
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, IECB, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Frédéric Rosu
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, IECB, UMS 3033, F-33600 Pessac, France
| | - Valérie Gabelica
- Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, ARNA, UMR 5320, U1212, IECB, F-33600 Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dremann DN, Chow CS. The use of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to monitor RNA-ligand interactions. Methods Enzymol 2020; 623:315-337. [PMID: 31239052 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
RNAs are drawing increasing attention as potential therapeutic targets. A significant challenge in the RNA drug discovery process is identification of compounds that not only disrupt the natural functions of RNA by binding with high affinity, but also do so selectively. Assessing the binding mode of small molecules with RNA is important for understanding how they select their binding site and impart their mechanism of action. A number of complementary assays are often employed for analysis of the binding mode and to determine selectivity. One important technique that gives information about the binding affinity and stoichiometry is electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI MS). More recent methods have also revealed the usefulness of ESI MS in determining the binding loci of small molecules on RNA.
Collapse
|
4
|
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Matzov
- Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel;, ,
| | - Anat Bashan
- Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel;, ,
| | - Ada Yonath
- Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel;, ,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kulik M, Markowska-Zagrajek A, Wojciechowska M, Grzela R, Wituła T, Trylska J. Helix 69 of Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA as a peptide nucleic acid target. Biochimie 2017; 138:32-42. [PMID: 28396015 DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2016] [Revised: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
A fragment of 23S ribosomal RNA (nucleotides 1906-1924 in E. coli), termed Helix 69, forms a hairpin that is essential for ribosome function. Helix 69 forms a conformationally flexible inter-subunit connection with helix 44 of 16S ribosomal RNA, and the nucleotide A1913 of Helix 69 influences decoding accuracy. Nucleotides U1911 and U1917 are post-transcriptionally modified with pseudouridines (Ψ) and U1915 with 3-methyl-Ψ. We investigated Helix 69 as a target for a complementary synthetic oligonucleotide - peptide nucleic acid (PNA). We determined thermodynamic properties of Helix 69 and its complexes with PNA and tested the performance of PNA targeted at Helix 69 in inhibiting translation in cell-free extracts and growth of E. coli cells. First, we examined the interactions of a PNA oligomer complementary to the G1907-A1919 fragment of Helix 69 with the sequences corresponding to human and bacterial species (with or without pseudouridine modifications). PNA invades the Helix 69 hairpin creating stable complexes and PNA binding to the pseudouridylated bacterial sequence is stronger than to Helix 69 without any modifications. Second, we confirmed the binding of PNA to 23S rRNA and 70S ribosomes. Third, we verified the efficiency of translation inhibition of these PNA oligomers in the cell-free translation/transcription E. coli system, which were in a similar range as tetracycline. Next, we confirmed that PNA conjugated to the (KFF)3K transporter peptide inhibited E. coli growth in micromolar concentrations. Overall, targeting Helix 69 with PNA or other sequence-specific oligomers could be a promising way to inhibit bacterial translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Kulik
- Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland; Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Markowska-Zagrajek
- Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland; Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1, 02-096, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Monika Wojciechowska
- Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Renata Grzela
- Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Wituła
- Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Trylska
- Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2c, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|