Use of a deoxynojirimycin-fluorophore conjugate as a cell-specific imaging probe targeting α-glucosidase on cell membranes

Spatial Chemoproteomics for Mapping the Active Proteome

Functional regulation of cell signaling through dynamic changes in protein activity state as well as spatial organization represent two dynamic, complex, and conserved phenomena in biology. Seemingly separate areas of -omics method development have focused on building tools that can detect and quantify protein activity states, as well as map sub-cellular and intercellular protein organization. Integration of these efforts, through the development of chemical tools and platforms that enable detection and quantification of protein functional states with spatial resolution provide opportunities to better understand heterogeneity in the proteome within cell organelles, multi-cellular tissues, and whole organisms. This review provides an overview of and considerations for major classes of chemical proteomic probes and technologies that enable protein activity mapping from sub-cellular compartments to live animals.

Synthesis, in vitro inhibitory activity, kinetic study and molecular docking of novel N-alkyl-deoxynojirimycin derivatives as potential α-glucosidase inhibitors

A series of novel N-alkyl-1-deoxynojirimycin derivatives 25 ∼ 44 were synthesised and evaluated for their in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity to develop α-glucosidase inhibitors with high activity. All twenty compounds exhibited α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with IC₅₀ values ranging from 30.0 ± 0.6 µM to 2000 µM as compared to standard acarbose (IC₅₀ = 822.0 ± 1.5 µM). The most active compound 43 was ∼27-fold more active than acarbose. Kinetic study revealed that compounds 43, 40, and 34 were all competitive inhibitors on α-glucosidase with K_iof 10 µM, 52 µM, and 150 µM, respectively. Molecular docking demonstrated that the high active inhibitors interacted with α-glucosidase by four types of interactions, including hydrogen bonds, π–π stacking interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and electrostatic interaction. Among all the interactions, the π–π stacking interaction and hydrogen bond played a significant role in a various range of activities of the compounds.