1
|
Klussmeier A, Aurich S, Niederstadt L, Wiedenmann B, Grötzinger C. Secretin Receptor as a Target in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Expression Analysis and Ligand Development. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10030536. [PMID: 35327338 PMCID: PMC8944975 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10030536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Secretin was originally discovered as a gastrointestinal peptide that stimulates fluid secretion from the pancreas and liver and delays gastric emptying. In disease, a secretin receptor (SCTR) was found to occur as a splice variant in gastrinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overexpression of SCTR has been described for gastrinomas, carcinoid tumors of the lung and cholangiocarcinoma. SCTR therefore is considered a candidate target for molecular tumor imaging as well as for peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) in a number of oncological indications. The aim of this study was to characterize SCTR expression in esophageal and pancreatic cancer, demonstrating for the first time high SCTR overexpression in these tumor types. In total, 65 of 70 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissues stained strongly positive for SCTR in immunohistochemistry, as did most of the 151 esophageal cancer samples, with minor influence of grading in both entities. In addition, the aim of this study was to further delineate residues in human secretin that are critical for binding to and activation of human SCTR. For a potential development of short and metabolically stable analogs for clinical use, it was intended to probe the peptide for its capacity to incorporate deletions and substitutions without losing its affinity to SCTR. In a systematic approach, a library of 146 secretin variants containing single amino acid substitutions as well as truncations on either end was tested in β-arrestin2-GFP translocation and fluorescent ligand internalization assays employing high-content analysis, in cAMP assays which run in agonist and antagonist mode, and in radioligand binding. The main structural determinants of SCTR binding and activation were localized to the N-terminus, with His1, Asp3 being among the most sensitive positions, followed by Phe6, Thr7 and Leu10. Aminoterminal truncation caused a rapid decline in receptor activity and most of these variants proved to be partial agonists showing antagonistic properties. In this study, the most potent novel antagonist showed an IC50 of 309 ± 74 nM in the β-arrestin2-GFP translocation assay on human SCTR while remaining a weak partial agonist. Future studies will have to demonstrate the utility of further enhanced secretin analogues as tracers for in vivo imaging and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Klussmeier
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (S.A.); (L.N.); (B.W.)
- Institut für Chemie und Biochemie, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Aurich
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (S.A.); (L.N.); (B.W.)
| | - Lars Niederstadt
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (S.A.); (L.N.); (B.W.)
| | - Bertram Wiedenmann
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (S.A.); (L.N.); (B.W.)
| | - Carsten Grötzinger
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (A.K.); (S.A.); (L.N.); (B.W.)
- Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 13353 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jastrzebska B, Comar WD, Kaliszewski MJ, Skinner KC, Torcasio MH, Esway AS, Jin H, Palczewski K, Smith AW. A G Protein-Coupled Receptor Dimerization Interface in Human Cone Opsins. Biochemistry 2017; 56:61-72. [PMID: 28045251 PMCID: PMC5274527 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) detect a wide variety of physical and chemical signals and transmit that information across the cellular plasma membrane. Dimerization is a proposed modulator of GPCR signaling, but the structure and stability of class A GPCR dimerization have been difficult to establish. Here we investigated the dimerization affinity and binding interface of human cone opsins, which initiate and sustain daytime color vision. Using a time-resolved fluorescence approach, we found that human red cone opsin exhibits a strong propensity for dimerization, whereas the green and blue cone opsins do not. Through mutagenesis experiments, we identified a dimerization interface in the fifth transmembrane helix of human red cone opsin involving amino acids I230, A233, and M236. Insights into this dimerization interface of red cone opsin should aid ongoing investigations of the structure and function of GPCR quaternary interactions in cell signaling. Finally, we demonstrated that the same residues needed for dimerization are also partially responsible for the spectral tuning of red cone opsin. This last observation has the potential to open up new lines of inquiry regarding the functional role of dimerization for red cone opsin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beata Jastrzebska
- Department of Pharmacology, Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
| | - William D. Comar
- Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, 190 Buchtel Common, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States
| | - Megan J. Kaliszewski
- Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, 190 Buchtel Common, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States
| | - Kevin C. Skinner
- Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, 190 Buchtel Common, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States
| | - Morgan H. Torcasio
- Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, 190 Buchtel Common, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States
| | - Anthony S. Esway
- Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, 190 Buchtel Common, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States
| | - Hui Jin
- Department of Pharmacology, Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
| | - Krzysztof Palczewski
- Department of Pharmacology, Cleveland Center for Membrane and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
| | - Adam W. Smith
- Department of Chemistry, University of Akron, 190 Buchtel Common, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee LTO, Ng SYL, Chu JYS, Sekar R, Harikumar KG, Miller LJ, Chow BKC. Transmembrane peptides as unique tools to demonstrate the in vivo action of a cross-class GPCR heterocomplex. FASEB J 2014; 28:2632-44. [PMID: 24599969 DOI: 10.1096/fj.13-246868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Angiotensin (ANGII) and secretin (SCT) share overlapping, interdependent osmoregulatory functions in brain, where SCT peptide/receptor function is required for ANGII action, yet the molecular basis is unknown. Since receptors for these peptides (AT1aR, SCTR) are coexpressed in osmoregulatory centers, a possible mechanism is formation of a cross-class receptor heterocomplex. Here, we demonstrate such a complex and its functional importance to modulate signaling. Association of AT1aR with SCTR reduced ability of SCT to stimulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), with signaling augmented in presence of ANGII or constitutively active AT1aR. Several transmembrane (TM) peptides of these receptors were able to affect their conformation within complexes, reducing receptor BRET signals. AT1aR TM1 affected only formation and activity of the heterocomplex, without effect on homomers of either receptor, and reduced SCT-stimulated cAMP responses in cells expressing both receptors. This peptide was active in vivo by injection into mouse lateral ventricle, thereby suppressing water-drinking behavior after hyperosmotic shock, similar to SCTR knockouts. This supports the interpretation that active conformation of AT1aR is a key modulator of cAMP responses induced by SCT stimulation of SCTR. The SCTR/AT1aR complex is physiologically important, providing differential signaling to SCT in settings of hyperosmolality or food intake, modulated by differences in levels of ANGII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo T O Lee
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; and
| | - Stephanie Y L Ng
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; and
| | - Jessica Y S Chu
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; and
| | - Revathi Sekar
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; and
| | - Kaleeckal G Harikumar
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Laurence J Miller
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Billy K C Chow
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; and
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Góngora-Benítez M, Tulla-Puche J, Albericio F. Multifaceted Roles of Disulfide Bonds. Peptides as Therapeutics. Chem Rev 2013; 114:901-26. [DOI: 10.1021/cr400031z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 388] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Góngora-Benítez
- Institute
for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, 08028 Spain
- CIBER-BBN, Barcelona Science
Park, Barcelona, 08028 Spain
| | - Judit Tulla-Puche
- Institute
for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, 08028 Spain
- CIBER-BBN, Barcelona Science
Park, Barcelona, 08028 Spain
| | - Fernando Albericio
- Institute
for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, 08028 Spain
- CIBER-BBN, Barcelona Science
Park, Barcelona, 08028 Spain
- Department
of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08028 Spain
- School of Chemistry & Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 4001 Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barwell J, Gingell JJ, Watkins HA, Archbold JK, Poyner DR, Hay DL. Calcitonin and calcitonin receptor-like receptors: common themes with family B GPCRs? Br J Pharmacol 2012; 166:51-65. [PMID: 21649645 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01525.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The calcitonin receptor (CTR) and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) are two of the 15 human family B (or Secretin-like) GPCRs. CTR and CLR are of considerable biological interest as their pharmacology is moulded by interactions with receptor activity-modifying proteins. They also have therapeutic relevance for many conditions, such as osteoporosis, diabetes, obesity, lymphatic insufficiency, migraine and cardiovascular disease. In light of recent advances in understanding ligand docking and receptor activation in both the family as a whole and in CLR and CTR specifically, this review reflects how applicable general family B GPCR themes are to these two idiosyncratic receptors. We review the main functional domains of the receptors; the N-terminal extracellular domain, the juxtamembrane domain and ligand interface, the transmembrane domain and the intracellular C-terminal domain. Structural and functional findings from the CLR and CTR along with other family B GPCRs are critically appraised to gain insight into how these domains may function. The ability for CTR and CLR to interact with receptor activity-modifying proteins adds another level of sophistication to these receptor systems but means careful consideration is needed when trying to apply generic GPCR principles. This review encapsulates current thinking in the realm of family B GPCR research by highlighting both conflicting and recurring themes and how such findings relate to two unusual but important receptors, CTR and CLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Barwell
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wheatley M, Wootten D, Conner MT, Simms J, Kendrick R, Logan RT, Poyner DR, Barwell J. Lifting the lid on GPCRs: the role of extracellular loops. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 165:1688-1703. [PMID: 21864311 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01629.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
GPCRs exhibit a common architecture of seven transmembrane helices (TMs) linked by intracellular loops and extracellular loops (ECLs). Given their peripheral location to the site of G-protein interaction, it might be assumed that ECL segments merely link the important TMs within the helical bundle of the receptor. However, compelling evidence has emerged in recent years revealing a critical role for ECLs in many fundamental aspects of GPCR function, which supported by recent GPCR crystal structures has provided mechanistic insights. This review will present current understanding of the key roles of ECLs in ligand binding, activation and regulation of both family A and family B GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Wheatley
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Wootten
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - M T Conner
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Simms
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Kendrick
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - R T Logan
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - D R Poyner
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Barwell
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKDrug Discovery Biology Laboratory, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Pharmacology, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|