Discovery of vanadium complexes bearing tridentate schiff base ligands as novel LSD1 inhibitors

Vanadium(V) Pyridine-Containing Schiff Base Catecholate Complexes are Lipophilic, Redox-Active and Selectively Cytotoxic in Glioblastoma (T98G) Cells

Two new series of complexes with pyridine-containing Schiff bases, [VV O(SALIEP)L] and [VV O(Cl-SALIEP)L] (SALIEP=N-(salicylideneaminato)-2-(2-aminoethylpyridine; Cl-SALIEP=N-(5-chlorosalicylideneaminato)-2-(2-aminoethyl)pyridine, L=catecholato(2-) ligand) have been synthesized. Characterization by 1 H and 51 V NMR and UV-Vis spectroscopies confirmed that: 1) most complexes form two major geometric isomers in solution, and [VV O(SALIEP)(DTB)] (DTB=3,5-di-tert-butylcatecholato(2-)) forms two isomers that equilibrate in solution; and 2) tert-butyl substituents were necessary to stabilize the reduced VIV species (EPR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry). The pyridine moiety within the Schiff base ligands significantly changed their chemical properties with unsubstituted catecholate ligands compared with the parent HSHED (N-(salicylideneaminato)-N'-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine) Schiff base complexes. Immediate reduction to VIV occurred for the unsubstituted-catecholato VV complexes on dissolution in DMSO. By contrast, the pyridine moiety within the Schiff base significantly improved the hydrolytic stability of [VV O(SALIEP)(DTB)] compared with [VV O(HSHED)(DTB)]. [VV O(SALIEP)(DTB)] had moderate stability in cell culture media. There was significant cellular uptake of the intact complex by T98G (human glioblastoma) cells and very good anti-proliferative activity (IC50 6.7±0.9 μM, 72 h), which was approximately five times higher than for the non-cancerous human cell line, HFF-1 (IC50 34±10 μM). This made [VV O(SALIEP)(DTB)] a potential drug candidate for the treatment of advanced gliomas by intracranial injection.

A comprehensive comparative study on LSD1 in different cancers and tumor specific LSD1 inhibitors

LSD1 was significantly over-expressed in several cancer types, and its aberrant overexpression was revealed to play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of cancer. Several LSD1 inhibitors that were discovered and developed so far were found to be effective in attenuating tumor growth in both in vivo and in vitro studies. However, the major challenge associated with the development of cancer therapies is personalized treatment. Therefore, it is essential to look in detail at how LSD1 plays its part in carcinogenesis and whether there are any different expression levels of LSD1 in different tumors. Here in this review, fresh insight into a list of function correlated LSD1 binding proteins are provided, and we tried to figure out the role of LSD1 in different cancer types, including hematological malignancies and solid tumors. A critical description of mutation preference for LSD1 in different tumors was also discussed. Recent research findings clearly showed that the abrogation of LSD1 demethylase activity via LSD1 inhibitors markedly reduced the growth of cancer cells. But there are still many ambiguities regarding the role of LSD1 in different cancers. Therefore, targeting LSD1 for treating different cancers is still reductionist, and many challenges need to be met to improve the therapeutic outcomes of LSD1 inhibitors.

Reversible Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) Inhibitors: A Promising Wrench to Impair LSD1

As a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent monoamine oxidase, lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A) functions as a transcription coactivator or corepressor to regulate the methylation of histone 3 lysine 4 and 9 (H3K4/9), and it has emerged as a promising epigenetic target for anticancer treatment. To date, numerous inhibitors targeting LSD1 have been developed, some of which are undergoing clinical trials for cancer therapy. Although only two reversible LSD1 inhibitors CC-90011 and SP-2577 are in the clinical stage, the past decade has seen remarkable advances in the development of reversible LSD1 inhibitors. Herein, we provide a comprehensive review about structures, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) of reversible LSD1 inhibitors.

Targeting LSD1 for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment

Targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an effective strategy, but currently there are very limited therapeutic targets for AML treatment. Histone lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is highly expressed in many cancers, impedes the differentiation of cancer cells, promotes the proliferation, metastasis and invasion of cancer cells, and is associated with poor prognosis. Targeting LSD1 has been recognized as a promising strategy for AML treatment in recent years. Based on these features, in the review, we discussed the main epigenetic drugs targeting LSD1 for AML therapy. Thus, this review focuses on the progress of LSD1 inhibitors in AML treatment, particularly those such as tranylcypromine (TCP), ORY-1001, GSK2879552, and IMG-7289 in clinical trials. These inhibitors provide novel scaffolds for designing new LSD1 inhibitors. Besides, combined therapies of LSD1 inhibitors with other drugs for AML treatment are also highlighted.

Histone lysine specific demethylase 1 inhibitors

LSD1 plays a pivotal role in numerous biological functions. The overexpression of LSD1 is reported to be associated with different malignancies. Over the last decade, LSD1 has emerged as an interesting target for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Numerous researchers have designed, synthesized, and evaluated various LSD1 inhibitors with diverse chemical architectures. Some of these inhibitors have entered clinical trials and are currently at different phases of clinical evaluation. This comprehensive review enlists recent research developments in LSD1 targeting pharmacophores reported over the last few years.

Synthesis, molecular structure and antioxidant activity of bis [L(μ2-chloro)copper(II)] supported by phenoxy/naphthoxy-imine ligands

A new series of Cu(II) complexes [bis[{(μ₂-chloro)-2-MeO-Ph-CH₂-(N=CH)-2,4-tert-butyl-2-OC₆H₂)}Cu(II)] (Cu1); bis[{(μ₂-chloro)-2-MeS-Ph-CH₂-(N=CH)-2,4-tert-butyl-2-(OC₆H₂)}Cu(II)] (Cu2); bis[{(μ₂-chloro)-2-MeO-Ph-CH₂-(N=CH)-2-(OC₁₀H₆)} Cu(II)] (Cu3); bis[{(μ₂-chloro)-2-MeS-Ph-CH₂-(N=CH)-2-(OC₁₀H₆)}Cu(II)] complex (Cu4); bis[{2-MeS-Ph-CH₂-(N=CH)-2,4-tert-butyl-2-(OC₆H₂)}Cu(II)] (Cu5)] have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, UV-Visible and by X-ray crystallography for Cu1, Cu4 and Cu5. In the solid state, Cu1 features of a chloro-bridged dimer complex with κ² coordination of the monoanionic phenoxy-imine ligand onto the copper center. On the other hand, the molecular structure of Cu4 reveals the naphthoxy-imine ligand with pendant S-group coordinated to the copper atom in tridentate meridional fashion. Treatment of [Cu(OAc)₂·H₂O] with two equiv. of [2-MeS-Ph-CH₂-(N=CH)-2,4-tert-butyl-2-(HOC₆H₂)] led to a monomeric complex Cu5, with the ONS-donor Schiff base acting as a bidentate ligand. The redox behavior was explored by cyclic voltammetry. The reduction/oxidation potential of Cu(II) complexes depends on the structure and conformation of the central atom in the coordination compounds. Antioxidant activities of the complexes, Cu1 - Cu5, were determined by in vitro assays such as 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl free radicals (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radicals (ABTS⁺). The dinuclear compounds Cu1-Cu4, from the concentration of 5 μM, presented a good activity in scavenging DPPH radical. In addition, most of the Cu(II) complexes showed ABTS^.+ radical-scavenging activity. The monomeric complex Cu5 at all concentrations tested showed antioxidant inability. The cytotoxicity of the Cu1 and Cu3 was determined in V79 cell line by reduction of 3(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.