A nationwide study on the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in school-children

The prevalence of rumination syndrome and rumination disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rumination is characterized by the repeated regurgitation of food. Rumination syndrome is a disorder of gut-brain interaction diagnosed by Rome criteria, whereas rumination disorder is a feeding and eating disorder diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria. We aimed to determine the global prevalence of rumination according to these criteria across all age groups.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of rumination syndrome according to Rome III and Rome IV and rumination disorder according to the following validated DSM-5 assessments: PARDI, EDA-5, EDY-Q, STEP, and STEP-CHILD. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO (from January 1, 2006, to June 1, 2023) to identify studies reporting the prevalence of rumination in community settings in participants of any age. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratio (OR) of rumination according to diagnostic criteria, country, and characteristics such as age and sex.

KEY RESULTS

The search strategy generated 1243 studies, of which 147 studies appeared to be relevant. Thirty studies were included, with a total of 114,228 participants, of whom 61,534 of these were adults and 52,694 were children. The pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages according to Rome III criteria was 1.0% (95% CI 0.3-1.6; I2 91.1%), but no data were available for adults. According to Rome IV criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages was 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.6; I2 56.4%) and 3.7% in adults (95% CI 2.3-5.1; I2 91.4%). The pooled prevalence of rumination disorder in children of all ages according to EDY-Q was 2.1% (95% CI 0.9-3.4; I2 = 78.1%), but only one study utilizing EDY-Q in adults was included (0.7% [95% CI 0.4-1.0]). No data were available for children or adults using any other validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder. Irrespective of diagnostic criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination was higher in adults compared to children and adolescents (3.0% [95% CI 1.4-4.7; I2 = 98.1%] vs. 0.8% [95% CI 0.4-1.3; I2 = 90.8%]), but higher in adolescents than in children (1.1% [95% CI 0.3-2.0; I2 = 92.8%] vs. 0.1% [95% CI 0.0-0.2; I2 = 24.5%]). In adults, factors independently associated with rumination were female gender (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0-2.0]), anxiety (OR 2.3 [95% CI 2.1-2.6]), and depression (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.2-2.9]). No association between gender and rumination was seen in children.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The prevalence of rumination is more common in adults than in children. In adults, rumination is associated with female gender, anxiety, and depression. Future population studies should aim to better understand why this behavior is more common in adults and also compare validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder with Rome criteria for rumination syndrome as prevalence may differ.

Psychological distress and coping efficacy in children with disorders of gut-brain interaction

BACKGROUND

Multiple psychological factors influence disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs). We aimed to evaluate psychological distress in Colombian schoolchildren with and without DGBIs.

METHODS

We included children ages 8-18 years without organic medical conditions from largest regional public schools in Colombia. Children completed Spanish versions of Rome III diagnostic questionnaire for DGBIs, State Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC), Children's Somatization Inventory (CSI), and a measure of coping efficacy. These data, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, were compared between children with DGBIs and healthy peers. Exploratory analyses investigated differences between youth with symptoms of functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) compared with healthy peers.

KEY RESULTS

Of 1496 children, 281 (mean age 12.9 ± 2.2 years, 49.8% females) self-reported criteria for DGBIs and 125 reported (44.5%) FAPDs. Children with DGBIs had higher trait anxiety, emotional sensitivity, somatization including GI, non-GI, pain-related, and non-pain-related subscales (p < 0.001 each) and lower coping efficacy (p = 0.02) compared to healthy peers. Females had higher trait anxiety and somatization (p = 0.04 and p = 0.005, respectively). State and trait anxiety and coping efficacy differed based on location in children with DGBIs (p = 0.02, p = 0.03, and p < 0.001, respectively). Children with FAPDs had higher trait anxiety (p = 0.02) and somatization (p < 0.001) compared to healthy youth.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Children with DGBIs had higher anxiety, emotional sensitivity, and somatization, and lower coping efficacy compared with healthy youth. This highlights the importance of appraising psychological distress characteristics as well as incorporating conflict resolution, assertiveness training, and resilience building during the treatment of DGBIs.

Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction in a National Cohort of Children With Down Syndrome

Background/Aims

Disorders of brain-gut interaction (DGBIs) are present in adults and children around the world. Down syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal condition in humans. While DS has associations with many organic medical conditions, the frequency of DGBIs in children and adolescents with DS has not previously been studied. We assess the rate of DGBIs in children and adolescents 4-18 years of age with DS in the United States using the Rome IV criteria by caregiver report.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional national survey study in which caregivers (n = 114) of children with DS completed an online survey about their child's gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life (QoL).

Results

Using the Rome IV parent-report diagnostic questionnaire, 51.8% of children met symptom-based criteria for at least 1 DGBI. Functional constipation (36.0%) and irritable bowel syndrome (14.9%) were the most common disorders identified. QoL was lower in children with at least 1 disorder as compared to children who did not meet criteria for any disorders (mean QoL = 62.3 vs mean QoL = 72.9, P < 0.001). Almost all children with DS and concomitant autism (87.5%) had at least 1 DGBI.

Conclusions

DGBIs are common in children with DS and are associated with diminished QoL.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: agreement between Rome III and Rome IV diagnoses

To evaluate the agreement between the Rome III and Rome IV criteria in diagnosing pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), we conducted a prospective cohort study in a public school in Cali, Colombia. Children and adolescents between 11 and 18 years of age were given the Spanish version of the Questionnaire on Pediatric Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Rome III version on day 0 and Rome IV version on day 2 (48 h later). The study protocol was completed by 135 children. Thirty-nine (28.9%) children were excluded because of not following the instructions of the questionnaire. The final analysis included data of 96 children (mean 15.2 years old, SD ± 1.7, 54% girls). Less children fulfilled the criteria for an FGID according to Rome IV compared to Rome III (40.6% vs 29.2%, p=0.063) resulting in a minimal agreement between the two criteria in diagnosing an FGID (kappa 0.34, agreement of 70%). The prevalence of functional constipation according to Rome IV was significantly lower compared to Rome III (13.5% vs 31.3%, p<0.001), whereas functional dyspepsia had a higher prevalence according to Rome IV than Rome III (11.5% vs 0%).Conclusion: We found an overall minimal agreement in diagnosing FGIDs according to Rome III and Rome IV criteria. This may be partly explained by the differences in diagnostic criteria. However, limitations with the use of questionnaires to measure prevalence have to be taken into account. What is Known: • The Rome IV criteria replaced the previous Rome III criteria providing updated criteria to diagnose functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). • Differences found between Rome IV and historic Rome III FGID prevalence may have been affected by changes in prevalence over time or differences in sample characteristics. What is New: • We found a minimal agreement between Rome III and Rome IV FGID diagnosis, especially in the diagnoses of functional constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, and functional dyspepsia. • The minimal agreement may be partly explained by changes in diagnostic criteria, but limitations with the use of questionnaires to measure prevalence have to be taken into account.

Subtipos del síndrome de intestino irritable en niños

La prevalencia del síndrome de intestino irritable (SII) pediátrico es 1,2%-5,4%, y los subtipos en niños latinoamericanos, no está especificada. El objetivo de este estudio es caracterizar los subtipos del SII y sus posibles asociaciones. Estudio de prevalencia en niños entre los ocho y 18 años de edad con SII según los Criterios de Roma III. Se tomaron variables sociodemográficas, familiares y clínicas. Los subtipos de SII se consideraron por la consistencia de las heces en SII con estreñimiento (SII-e); diarrea (SII-d); mixto (SII-m) y sin subtipo (SII-ss). La estadística incluyó análisis uni y bivariados. Los datos fueron analizados usando t-student a dos colas, chi2, prueba exacta de Fisher y razón de prevalencia (RP) con IC95%, siendo p<0,05 significativa. Fueron incluidos 196 niños (53,6% femeninos; mediana de 11 años); presentándose SII-ss en 64,8%, SII-e en 19,9%, SII-m en 8,7% y SII-d en 6,6%. Hubo diferencias significativas en las características de las heces (p=0,01), en la incontinencia fecal (p=0,02), en los fecalomas (p=0,00); y posibles asociaciones entre el SII-d, ciudad (p=0,00) y malnutrición (p=0,02). En conclusión, luego del SII-ss, ¼ de los niños estudiados presentó SII-e, seguido del SII-m y SII-d; presentándose el SII-d con mayor oportunidad en malnutridos.

Post-infectious functional gastrointestinal disorders in children after a non-severe dengue episode without warning signs

Introduction: The pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal disorders involves infectious agents such as viruses. Objective: To study the development of functional gastrointestinal disorders 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after an episode of non-severe dengue without warning signs in children. Materials and methods: We conducted a cohort study in 73 children diagnosed with non-severe dengue without warning signs at Hospital Universitario del Valle “Evaristo García” and 62 healthy children from Cali, Colombia. Using the Questionnaire for Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rome III (QPGS-III) in Spanish we identified functional gastrointestinal disorders 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after non-severe dengue without warning signs. Measurements of central tendency, relative risk, chi square, and Fisher’s exact test were performed, with p<0.05 being significant. Results: We included 135 children who were 10.7±1.9 years old; 51.1% of them were male and 19.3% had a functional gastrointestinal disorder (9.6% of them had abdominal pain related to functional gastrointestinal disorders). There was a greater risk to present a functional gastrointestinal disorder and related abdominal pain in children after non-severe dengue without warning signs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up, but without significant differences. Conclusion: Our study suggests that non-severe dengue without warning signs does not increase the risk of functional gastrointestinal disorders and related abdominal pain for up to 12 months of follow-up.

¿El antecedente de dengue está asociado a la presencia de Desórdenes Gastrointestinales Funcionales en Niños?

Introducción: La patogénesis de los desórdenes gastrointestinales funcionales (DGFs) es multifactorial.Objetivo: Investigar la prevalencia de DGFs luego del antecedente de dengue.Materiales y métodos: Estudio de prevalencia en niños entre 8-18 años de edad. Se tomaron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y el antecedente del último año de dengue diagnosticado en urgencias. Se aplicó el Cuestionario para Síntomas Gastrointestinales Pediátricos Roma III en Español para DGFs. El análisis estadístico incluyó el cálculo del OR, con IC95% y Fisher a dos colas, con una p<0.05 significativo.Resultados: Fueron incluidos 4023 niños con edad 11,9±2,3 años y 50,1% masculinos. La prevalencia para presentar al menos 1 DGFs fue 23.0% y del antecedente de haber presentado dengue en el último año del 7,5%; habiendo predominio en escolares entre 8-12 años de edad (OR=1,56 IC95%=1,20-2,04 p=0,0006) y con al menos 1 DGFs (OR=1,98 IC95%=1,53-2,56 p<0,0001). En los niños que por antecedente presentaron dengue en el último año, hubo diferencias significativas cuando tenían padres separados/divorciados.Conclusión: En este grupo de niños, los DGFs son frecuentes, presentándose mayor oportunidad de tener algún DGFs en los escolares entre los 8-12 años de edad cuando se tiene el antecedente de dengue diagnosticado en un servicio de urgencias.

Gluten and Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders in Children

In children, functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common at all ages. Consumption of certain foods, particularly gluten, is frequently associated with the development and persistence of FGIDs and functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) in adults and children. However, this association is not well defined. Even without a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD), some people avoid gluten or wheat in their diet since it has been shown to trigger mostly gastrointestinal symptoms in certain individuals, especially in children. The incidence of conditions such as non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is increasing, particularly in children. On the other hand, CD is a chronic, autoimmune small intestinal enteropathy with symptoms that can sometimes be mimicked by FAPD. It is still unclear if pediatric patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are more likely to have CD. Abdominal, pain-associated FGID in children with CD does not seem to improve on a gluten-free diet. The threshold for gluten tolerance in patients with NCGS is unknown and varies among subjects. Thus, it is challenging to clearly distinguish between gluten exclusion and improvement of symptoms related solely to functional disorders.