Towards a better understanding of the social stigma of facial difference

Breaking the silence: A qualitative exploration of parental perspectives of children with Goldenhar Syndrome

Background

Goldenhar Syndrome is a rare congenital condition, typically characterized by craniofacial abnormalities and vertebral malformations. Due to its rare and complex nature, the etiology is unconfirmed, resulting in parental uncertainty and subsequent emotional sequelae. Clinical manifestations have been researched but few studies have explored parental wellbeing and Quality of Life (QoL). In this qualitative study, we explore parental views of the challenges and lived experience of raising a child with Goldenhar Syndrome.

Methods

Ten biological parents (five mothers and five fathers), recruited at the Goldenhar UK Conference, took part in audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews. Interviews explored emotional wellbeing, views surrounding causation, support accessed, challenges faced, experience of stigma and future outlooks. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed, and transcripts were subject to deductive and inductive coding.

Results

Seven themes were identified: support networks (Goldenhar UK), rollercoaster of emotion; gendered coping; uncertainty; societal reactions; coping with challenge and acceptance.

Conclusions

This is the first-time the life perspectives of parents, raising a child with Goldenhar Syndrome, have been explored via interviews. We have unearthed prominent issues that impact parental QoL including isolation and distress at the point of diagnosis, and throughout the multidisciplinary health journey. We have also established significant indicators of the ongoing QoL challenges faced by young people with Goldenhar Syndrome. Future work is underway exploring these issues further with teenagers, young people and adults with Goldenhar to develop a conceptual framework of their QoL. This will be used to develop a bespoke patient reported outcome (PRO) to give voice to the challenges children and young adults face during their medical journey.

Disclosing the obvious: Psychosocial implications of (not) explaining facial differences

Although the disclosure of invisible stigmatized identities has been frequently researched, little work has examined disclosure of facial differences (FD), in which stigma is often highly visible. People with FD are frequently expected by others to disclose or explain their condition. Qualitative work indicates that people with FD have a range of disclosure approaches from agentic disclosure (feeling obliged to disclose), autonomous nondisclosure (choosing not to disclose or to disclose only to certain people), and autonomous disclosure (choosing to openly disclose). The purpose of the present study was to validate these disclosure approaches in a large international sample, examine their frequency of use, and test their relationship to psychosocial outcomes using validated measures. English-speaking participants (n = 288) with 33 different types of FD completed an online survey of disclosure approaches and psychosocial outcomes (i.e. anxiety, depression, self-esteem, stigma, job satisfaction, and relationship self-concept). Participants disclosed to 59 % of the people they knew. Selective and indiscriminate disclosure were the most frequently used and recommended approaches. As predicted, autonomous disclosure was associated with more positive psychosocial outcomes than agentic (non)disclosure and autonomous nondisclosure. Findings from this study can support disclosure autonomy, and thus positive psychosocial outcomes, among people with FD.